Last modification 54 there is
Europe panics as Trump rises from his political grave
Europe panics as Trump rises from his political graveJacob's Ladder - Apr 11, 2024
Last week was full of twists and turns. It began with the United States Supreme Court's 9-0 condemnation of the use of the 14th Amendment to punish political opponents.
Then the Wicked Witch of kyiv, Vic(Toria) “Cookies” Nuland, was ousted from the State Department after torturing the world for decades with her psychopathy.
Then Donald Trump practically sent Nikki Haley back to his Waffle House near Greenville.
Finally, French President Emmanuel Macron tried to convince the whole world that NATO was ready to send troops to Ukraine. Which ones? Clearly not French troops, who are only good at this point for “going on safari in North Africa,” according to Colonel Doug MacGregor.
And not the British ships either, which don't seem to be able to leave port. I think there is a sort of competition between the failures of the Boeing airlines and the failures of the British ships… but I can also be a conspiracy theorist.
*bong*
No, the answer has always been that it would be American troops in Europe fighting Europe's war that everyone – the UK, Davos and its EU apparatchiks, and US neoconservatives – thought it would be a resounding success in bleeding Russia.
And I'm sure that's exactly how they planned it in their Microsoft Project file at Globalist Central.
This clearly did not happen and it is Ukraine which is in great difficulty today. The truth, which has become rare since the start of the war two years ago, is that Ukraine has always been in great difficulty.
And this led, predictably, to the situation we have today. U.S. support for the Ukraine project is coming to an end, if it hasn't already. And the panic in Europe is palpable.
All this was very predictable if we accepted the framework of a split at the top of the American hierarchy. One faction committed to the Davos vision of the future, which involved a docile, even defeated, United States, and another faction that looked up from their screens and said, “Uh…no.”
It was all obvious about eight months ago, when the big NATO summit in Vilnius ended with groans from then-British Defense Minister Ben Wallace. Wallace was supposed to replace Jens Stoltenberg as NATO Secretary General, but was pushed aside by Joe Biden (JOAH Bii-Den!).
After that, there was no further talk of Ukraine joining NATO. Zelensky returned to kyiv with tears in his eyes after Biden gave him nothing either. Then, in October, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy was ousted in a coup by Matt Gaetz and a handful of GOP tax hardliners.
They immediately got new House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) to tie any new foreign aid funding to spending cuts and earmarking funds for border security, in as much as the slim majority in Congress would allow.
Since then, Joe Biden has been forced to look under the Pentagon sofas for a few million dollars to send to Ukraine. He found 300 the other day. As bad as the situation is, the fact that it's millions rather than billions should be considered a victory.
The Senate tried to blackmail Johnson with its ridiculous $95 billion aid bill and Johnson simply pressured boss Chuck Schumer by requesting a two-week recess. Today, the best they can hope for is a more modest bill, with a loan/rental clause, without the money being earmarked for “humanitarian aid” – a euphemism for fill the pockets.
And despite his rapprochement with Senate hawks, Johnson continues to use aid to Ukraine as a way to put domestic financing reforms first. Every day of haggling over these issues is another day that spells the end of Project Ukraine, as Russian forces take towns and villages in Western Donbas every day.
Again, this is not an ideal solution, far from it, but it is a Pyrrhic victory.
But this is the situation after last week and it is much better than at the beginning of the year, since this money was already expected six months ago.
Europe is now able to completely remove the mask. Indeed, as the United States slowly withdraws from Ukraine, the EU's calls for America to stay the course are growing louder and more strident.
Remember that in 2022-23, when it looked like the United States was determined to move forward in Ukraine, European leaders like Macron and others were more circumspect. They wanted to give a warning about the dangers of escalation in Ukraine. They were able to appear as moderates in the situation room, while continuing to send billions of euros in aid and weapons, forcing everyone to comply with their demands.
The real event revealing Europe's real position on this war was Hungary's threat to Viktor Orban of complete economic devastation if he did not allow their aid program to continue. 50 billion dollars to pass to the European Council.
Now that all of Nuland's military plans have failed, the Ukrainian army has been destroyed for the third time, and all their attempts to undermine the United States legally and economically (Powell must Pivot!) have failed, Europe is found in blind panic.
“The US Democratic government and EU leaders, as well as the leaders of the largest EU member states, are pro-war governments. Donald Trump is for peace, Hungary is for peace. This difference is the basis of everything”
Last modification 54 there is
15 French soldiers, 000% of troops lost in 85 days of fighting!
15 French soldiers, 000% of troops lost in 85 days of fighting!Insolentiae – Apr 06, 2024
“Warfighter” exercise 15 French soldiers engaged, 000 killed or wounded, 12% of troops lost in 700 days of fighting!
You know how much good I think of our professor Trouposol's desire to send our soldiers to have holes in their skins in the Dardanelles.
You also know that in our world, everything is simulated. Everything has to be counted, everything has to be prepared and everything has to be modelled.
We know with relative precision how much a pandemic will cost as a percentage of GDP and the “Event 201” exercise, which simulated a global pandemic based on coronavirus, gave results very close to reality.
So, we have to dig a little into high-intensity exercises to get an idea of the damage, our means and what it could be.
Warfighter Exercise April 2021
“A French intervention force made up of two combined arms brigades, or 15 soldiers, is engaged. After 000 days of bitter fighting, 10 were killed, 1 wounded, or 700 per day. This is the outcome of the Warfighter exercise conducted in the United States in April 11. In addition to the feedback on interoperability with the American and British ally, the sequence made it possible to point out the significant number of wounded to be treated in the event of high intensity conflict” (source Le Point here).
This is what a massive French commitment of ground troops in Ukraine could look like. We would initially have difficulty exceeding 15 men and therefore effectively two modern NATO-size brigades.
These two brigades would last 10 days and then… nothing more. All dead (or injured).
In this simulation we arrive at 1 dead and 700 injured (and that's not just a flipped nail). This makes 11 soldiers lost or out of action, or 000% of the initial troops in… 12 days.
You understand why the Ukrainian army is having difficulty holding out its war over the long term.
As you know, it is impossible to talk about Ukrainian losses without being accused of pro-Russian propaganda...
Last modification 54 there is
Israel prepares to attack Lebanon
Israel prepares to attack LebanonVoltairenet - March 18, 2024
Israel is preparing to attack Lebanon, either at the end of Ramadan, in mid-April, or even earlier.
Its objective would be to create a buffer zone in Lebanese territory south of the Litani River, as it had tried in vain to do in 2006. It therefore first engaged in a systematic destruction of all the infrastructure built in this area by Hezbollah for fourteen years.
In order to prevent accusations of war crimes, the IDF dropped leaflets in southern Lebanon. It reads: “Residents of the South, Hezbollah endangers your lives, those of your families and your homes. Hezbollah installs its members and its weapons depots in your neighborhoods.” They can thus argue that they did not target a civilian population, but on the contrary warned them in advance.
Since the start of Operation Iron Sword, the IDF has bombed 4 targets, mainly located in the South, but also in Baalbeck, while avoiding attacking other components of Lebanese society. The Netanyahu government hopes that the country's lack of unity will allow it to gradually destroy the arsenal of the Party of God, without provoking any noticeable reaction. He claims to have already eliminated 500 Shiite fighters. Hezbollah recognizes 300.
IDF Unit 8200 intercepts all Lebanese telephone and internet communications as well as almost all private security cameras. She cross-checks this information and manages to identify almost all of her human and physical targets. This is how it was able, for example, to locate the leader of Hamas opposed to the Muslim Brotherhood, Saleh Al-Arouri, in January and assassinate him.
At the same time, Israel is preparing for a major response from Hezbollah. It has just purchased port facilities in Larnaca (Cyprus) in preparation for the destruction of the port of Haifa. These facilities will, in any case, subsequently be used to establish the transport corridor linking India to Europe, via Israel.
Likewise, numerous underground parking lots have been set up in the north of the Jewish state to accommodate civilians in the event of bombings. In addition to the installation of toilets, ventilation ducts, medicines and furniture, food for two days will be stored there.
Last modification 54 there is
For your safety you will have war!
Insolentiae - March 16, 2024
Professor Trouposol addresses the nation.
Haaaaaa…. in the series Tintin at the Popovs (those who experienced the Cold War and the expressions of the time will understand), our professor Trouposol learnedly explained to us that for our security we had to think about waging war... otherwise we could have war .
As an emeritus member of the 7th company, with Chief Chaudard, on the ground, we have another perception of the situation.
You are sitting down I hope… no because the intro of the great chef is capable of making you fall to the floor!
“You are sitting,” he told reporters. “You wouldn’t rule out getting up at the end of the show”? So the ground troops are the same. So.
War is simple.
Simple as a good valve.
Simple as a “bon mot”.
The textbooks (not the Emmanuels eh) will therefore remember that the Third World War took place because Trouposol, that day did not exclude getting up. You will listen. It's lunar.
A Mozart of strategic ambiguity.
But that's not all…
Then Professor Trouposol explained to us that he produces 100 shells per day and 75 Caesar cannons per year, and I am happy as are our enemies the Russians to learn this. These are useful statistics for winning a war of attrition. Is there no one at the general staff to explain to Tintin at the Elysée that certain figures should not be given? Or we poisoned and he had to tell Professor Trouposol that we were going to release 2025 Caesar cannons from 750. There the Kremlin would have trembled.
Short.
According to Trouposol we must not be cowardly and we must prevent Russia at all costs from winning in Ukraine, which amounts to saying that we must make Russia lose.
If no one accepts at least a little loss then by definition there is no peace or negotiation possible, there is only more war.
Macron does not have the means for this adage. First with our 3 billion debts and we will come back to that, Professor Trouposol du Palais is not strong. Our army can potentially hold a front of 100 to 80km at high intensity for a week. A little short to challenge Russia. Obviously Trouposol's genius idea is to go there "as Europeans" with the other "friends".
So we do not have the wisdom to be strong.
Finally, the spoiled child of the Palace is not wise at all because engaging the army against Russia will require going through Parliament. And no, Macron cannot arrogate to himself the right to decide alone to take France towards war against Russia, in the same way that he cannot have the stupidity to try to make us believe that the interests vital “existential” assets of Europe are threatened in Ukraine. It's wrong. The borders of the European Union are known, also by the Russians. Attacking a member country of the European Union would be a casus belli. We completely agree on that.
Ukraine is not in the European Union. This may be very sad for the Ukrainians, but they are in no way in our vital interests and it is important to say what a potential clash with Russia means. We will not lose 50 or 80 soldiers over 8 years like in Africa. We will lose 50 to 60% of an expeditionary force of 10 men. This is the reality. We will have thousands of deaths, ending with the signing of a peace treaty. Absurd. Without wisdom.
Last modification 54 there is
The State will take from your A savings accounts to finance the war.
Insolentiae - March 14, 2024
Charles Sannat: Huge mistake!
It's war, Emperor Palpoutine threatens France and thanks to the legislation on requisitions (idiot trap) we can clearly see the slight temptation to seize savings, sorry to drain, as Bruno Le Maire would say, these considerable sums that Europeans have in their bank accounts. These colossal savings that he is eyeing to finance our considerable deficits.
But rest assured, we are in a democracy and in democracy we have the values of the Republic which protect us.
We therefore take your Livret A to finance the war in Ukraine without asking you if this suits your “morality” and your social responsibility.
It’s true what…
Financing Total and the gas stations is bad.
But that Livret A finances the war and the cannon merchants… that’s good!
This will all go wrong, plus it's a very bad idea in terms of risks.
Is there anyone who can warn Bruno? Send him this note, he must not know about it at Bercy!
Come on, let me explain.
We have to finance the war, very good tintin. But if Bruno gives money to the shell factories like what he did to the mask factories during the last war against a vir-Russian, while here it is against the Russians quite simply, the factories made masks then they immediately went bankrupt.
The same thing will happen with the war. War is a thing for stupid idiots. So we produce weapons, we get in the face, then we make peace. Always. When you put your mind to it, you produce a lot. Once we make peace we no longer produce anything or very little. The gun dealers will go bankrupt.
The problem is that the artist from Bercy, Bruno, guarantees the booklet A…. or the booklet hahahahahahahahahahha.
So he's going to finance something that's going to fail in the long term by using money that he has to guarantee while reducing the debt... hahahahahahahahaha.
Haaa, the star of Bercy must tell him everything.
My Bruno, drop booklet A, you have to do the LDG. Yes, the war book. LDG. I removed the second D side for sustainable… on the ecology side, war is average.
So my Bruno, you are launching an unguaranteed LDG (you don't say it too much, but it's not guaranteed). Then you ask LCI and BFM to loop the importance of supporting Ukraine, sending money is better than sending our sons, you play on the guilt of the masses and the oldest who have the money vote Macron and listen to BFM. Easy. You suggest to Cnews to let them go on condition that they do some work for your LDG. You'll raise at least 10 billion, easy. You spend them, as usual. You burn them like every time… then after the war, you will say… oops, there’s more…. but it was for a good cause.
So my good Bruno you will not have destabilized the financing of social housing from Livret A, you will not have shot yourself in the foot with debt and you will have taken money from those who could lose it without forcing anyone . Do not forget. Values of the Republic, democracy something coughed.
Come on, I continue with economic and heritage cynicism.
Last modification 54 there is
Requisitions: In what direction do these texts really go?
Requisitions: In what direction do these texts really go?International Network - March 13, 2024
New articles of the Defense Code resulting from the Military Programming Law of August 2023.
As a foreigner, subject of His British Majesty, Mendelssohn does not have the keys to understanding the overlap of the different Codes and Laws in France.
Since in law, one word will be placed to hide another.
Thus, Mendelssohn invites jurists with qualifications that he does not possess, to dissect for us the interweaving of the legislative texts discussed below.
(In case people without children are tempted to turn a blind eye – Papa Mendelssohn has five, all of them almost old enough to be drafted, without even coming to the point of requisition…)
To open the festivities, some historical reminder lines appearing on an official site:
Requisitions and Compulsory Labor Service – 1943
The turning point of the STO
As German demands continued to intensify, the Vichy government adopted a new requisition system with the law of February 16, 1943 which established the “compulsory labor service” (STO). All young French people born in 1920, 1921 and 1922 declared fit after a medical examination must go to work in Germany for two years. Important warnings are immediately addressed to those who do not obey. The sanctions to which they are exposed are fines ranging from 200 to 100 francs and prison sentences ranging from 000 months to 3 years, likely, in the event of a repeat offense, to be doubled.
France is the only occupied country in Europe where requisitions are not the consequence of German orders but of a law adopted by the French state.
https://www.cheminsdememoire.gouv.fr/1943-les-consequences-du-sto-dans-la-creation-des-maquis
If Mendelssohn understood correctly, the Military Programming Law passed in August 2023 modifies, among other things, the Defense Code. These are therefore the new articles of the Defense Code in question here.
• https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/article_jo/JORFARTI000047915043
Title I
Requisitions for the needs of defense and national security
Chapter II
General principles
"Art. L. 2212-1.-In the event of a threat, current or foreseeable, weighing on activities essential to the life of the Nation, the protection of the population, the integrity of the territory or the permanence of the institutions of the Republic or likely to justify the implementation of the international commitments of the State in matters of defense, the requisition of any person, natural or legal, and of all the goods and services necessary to meet them may be decided by decree in Council ministers. (…)
Mendelssohn asks:
1) In law, legal certainty requires that the citizen understands what we are talking about. Each term used must therefore be defined without ambiguity.
In the context of this article, what does it mean
- threat
– current
– predictable (within six weeks? six years? six decades?)
– activities essential to the life of the Nation (Leclerc supermarkets? Pharmacies carrying out PCR tests?)
– “threat likely to justify the implementation of the State’s international defense commitments”
There are multiple hierarchical levels of a state's international “commitments.” Furthermore, the term “commitment” is not, unless I am mistaken, a legal term in this specific context.
Are we talking about treaties? Written commitments? Unwritten? Kept secret (presence of “mercenaries” in Ukraine)? Under the radar (military activities of France in Africa)?
Or even one-person agreements between the Micronian and X, such as that of February 16 with the current Ukrainian president1 agreement whose legality is more than uncertain?
(We will soon return to the said bilateral security agreement of February 16: apart from committing billions with tax as a source, thousands of French soldiers and specialists should urgently leave for Ukraine, assuming that France is willing and able to comply with it).
[...]
Last modification 54 there is
Vladimir Putin responds to Emmanuel Macron
International Network - March 12, 2024
Consequences of Macron's statements.
“The West continues to lie and terrorize the world. Today, the West shamelessly claims that Russia intends to attack Europe. But you and I know they are talking nonsense.”
Last modification 54 there is
Send French civilians to war or prison
Send French civilians to war or prisonThe Media in 4-4-2 - March 02, 2024
A law allows Macron to send French civilians to war or imprison them for 5 years and a €500.000 fine if they refuse.
Who remembers what happened in the National Assembly on August 1, 2023? The Macron government voted for the possibility of requisitioning goods and people "in the event of a threat", by decree in the Council of Ministers. The move raises concerns about its potential for abuse and restriction of individual freedoms. Especially since our President's completely crazy statements regarding sending ground troops to Ukraine...
Under the terms of this law, any person or entity, natural or legal, as well as any necessary goods or services, may be requisitioned if a threat, current or foreseeable, weighs on activities essential to the life of the nation. The government justifies this measure by asserting that it is crucial to deal with possible major crises, whether security, health or other.
This legislative text, integrated into the bill relating to military programming for the years 2024 to 2030, was adopted at first reading by the National Assembly on June 7, 2023. The deputies and senators met in a joint committee on June 6, 2023. July 14 to discuss a final version of the bill, with the government hoping to enact it around July XNUMX.
Art. L. 2212‑1
In the event of a threat, current or foreseeable (...) the requisition of any person, natural or legal, and of all the goods and services necessary to deal with it may be decided by decree in the Council of Ministers.Art. L. 2212‑2
When Article L. 2212-1 is not applied, in the event of an emergency, if the safeguarding of national defense interests justifies it, the Prime Minister may order, by decree, the requisition of any person, natural or legal, of any goods or services.Art. L. 2212‑5
Natural persons are requisitioned based on their physical & psychological abilities and their professional or technical skills.Art. L. 2212‑6
In compliance with this title, the following may be subject to a requisition measure:
1° Any natural person present on the national territory
2° Any natural person of French nationality not residing on the national territoryArt. L. 2212‑9
Failure to comply with the measures legally ordered pursuant to articles L. 5-500.000 and L. 2212-1 is punishable by imprisonment of 2212 years and a fine of €2.
Last modification 54 there is
Censorship of Telegram channels the day Ukraine carries out a massacre in Belgorod
International Network - Feb 17, 2024
by Christelle Neant
On February 15, 2024, while Ukraine heavily bombed the Russian city of Belgorod (killing several civilians including a baby), France censored around twenty French-speaking Telegram channels for “disinformation”. The timing of this censorship clearly indicates that Paris no longer wants the French to know that Ukraine is deliberately killing civilians with weapons supplied to it by Western countries.
In broad daylight on February 15, 2024, the Ukrainian army fired 18 rockets with Vampire multiple rocket launchers supplied by the Czech Republic (the range of the rockets used was 40 km). Russian anti-aircraft defense shoots down 14 rockets, but four continue their flight towards the city. The result is a real bloodbath. Six people, including a baby, were killed and 17 injured. As several people are in serious condition, the number of deaths could still change.
The targeted targets (a shopping center, a school stadium and other residential areas) are not military in nature, and prove once again that Ukraine is using Western weapons to commit war crimes, facts which disturb the Western narrative, so to prevent people from asking questions, France (along with Germany and Poland) decided to opt for the outright censorship of around twenty French-speaking Telegram channels which were allegedly “Russian disinformation”.
Last modification 54 there is
The United States and NATO prepare military bases for war with Russia
International Network - Feb 15, 2024
Europe is currently hosting NATO's largest exercise since the end of the Cold War, Steadfast Defender 2024. They began on January 22 and will last until May 31, involving 90 troops and a large number of defense systems. weapons of 000 member countries of the “peaceful” bloc, as well as Sweden, which is still officially “neutral”.
These exercises are intended to test, develop and improve the regional defense plans of the North Atlantic Alliance, which were adopted in the summer of 2023. At the same time, less grandiose maneuvers will be carried out in different parts of Europe. Particular attention is paid to Northern Europe. So, in the period from March 5 to 14, the NATO exercises Nordic Response-24 (Northern Response-24) are to take place. They will be held in Norway, Finland, Sweden and the adjacent waters of the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans.
During the Nordic Response-24 maneuvers, in addition to the transfer of personnel and equipment by sea, elements of the movement of forces and land and air assets from Finland and Sweden to Norway and back will be developed . The ground forces of Sweden and Finland will begin moving their troops from the Enontekie region (Finnish Lapland) towards Norway from March 1 to 3, i.e. before the exercises. Then the bulk of them will pass. After that, the troops of Sweden and Finland will leave Norway in the opposite direction, from March 14 to 17, that is, after the exercises.
In turn, the United States is rapidly increasing its presence in Northern Europe, entering into separate defense agreements with Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland. Washington has used its agents in these countries, who have been spreading information about Russian “aggression” for years. The Americans' actions are part of their “Arctic doctrine”, which aims to block the Russian northern sea route.
Recently, the United States signed an addendum to an earlier defense agreement with Norway. The Americans had access to the following facilities: Haakonsvern military base, Andøya, Ørland and Bardufoss airfields, Værnes airfield and garrison, Setermoen garrison (firing and training range) and the Osmarka and Namsen logistics infrastructure facilities. Before that, only four facilities were included in the agreement: Rygge, Evenes, Sola airfields and the Ramsund naval base.
Last modification 54 there is
The global situation regarding the massacre in Gaza
Voltairenet - Feb 08, 2024
At every moment, people wonder if the massacre in Gaza will not degenerate into a World War.
It could be, but it isn't. All the protagonists in the Levant act with restraint, each avoiding the irreparable, while the Jewish supremacists of Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition inexorably advance their pawns.
At the end of four months of war in Gaza against the Palestinian people and against the Hamas current belonging to the Palestinian Resistance, but never against that obeying the Muslim Brotherhood, the different actors have displayed their position.
While pretending to its citizens to fight against Hamas in general, Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition works to terrorize Gazans to make them flee. The deprivations, tortures and massacres are not an end in themselves, just means to achieve annexation of this land.
Ansar Allah, the powerful Yemeni political party, took the initiative to attack Israeli ships or ships stopping in Israel in the Red Sea, demanding an end to the massacre in Gaza. Gradually, it also attacked ships linked to states supporting this massacre. The United Nations Security Council recalled that international law prohibits attacks on civilian ships while recognizing that the problem will not be resolved as long as the massacre continues.
The United States, while opposing the massacre of Palestinian civilians, has shown solidarity with the Jewish Israeli population in its blind vengeance against them. They continued to supply the IDF with shells, while calling on Tel Aviv to let in the required humanitarian aid. On this same political line, they took charge of the problem posed by the resistance of the Yemenis by creating Operation “Guardian of Prosperity”. They involved their Western cronies in violation of the authority of the United Nations Security Council, which has never authorized military intervention in Yemen. However, the French military staff withdrew from this alliance after two days, highlighting its conscientious objection to covering the Gaza massacre. Moreover, the Western bombings did not succeed in hitting the military centers of Ansar Allah.
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which have just fought a long war in Yemen, refrained from joining “Guardian of Prosperity” and, on the contrary, signed a peace agreement with Ansar Allah. Everyone agreed on the position of the Arab League, formulated in 2002: recognition and normalization with Israel upon the creation of a Palestinian state.
Egypt, which, through a domino effect, lost 45% of its revenues from the Suez Canal, did not turn against Ansar Allah. On the contrary, Cairo contacted him and publicly praised his effort in favor of the Palestinian people. At most, he called on his interlocutors not to completely block the Red Sea. Chinese and Russian ships continue to move freely and Ansar Allah has announced that it is restricting its targets.
Iran, after having called on its various partners in the Axis of Resistance not to aggravate the situation, suddenly came out of its reserve. Tehran has bombed sites linked to Israel or the United States in three separate states: Syria illegally occupied by the United States, Iraq where its presence is legal but not some of its activities, and Pakistan where it supports a Baluch separatist movement.
The White House responded that these attacks would not go unpunished, but did nothing immediately. If its response is light, all the protagonists will conclude that Washington is only a “paper tiger”, if it is strong, it risks opening the way to a Third World War.
Syria applauded. Iraq protested, paying lip service to the fact that there has never been a Mossad base in its autonomous region of Kurdistan. Then he asked Western Forces to withdraw from the country.
Pakistan, whose new government Washington hoped would be ready to go to war against Iran, has, under the influence of its army, rallied to Tehran in its fight against pro-US separatists
It is in this context that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued its provisional order in the case between South Africa and Israel, which it accuses of allowing a genocide to be carried out under the responsibility of certain of its leaders. The Court, chaired by a former official of the US State Department, reached by an overwhelming majority of 15 judges against 2, a decision corresponding in every respect to the position of the United States: it recognized that there was suspicion of genocide and ordered Israel to ensure that the required humanitarian aid entered Gaza, but was careful not to go further. She said nothing about demands for reparations for victims, nor about Israel's condemnation of individuals guilty of genocide. Above all, she refrained from saying that “the Israeli state must immediately suspend its military operations inside and against Gaza”.
Pretending to agree to comply with this order, Israel liberated the Rafah crossing and announced measures in favor of the passage of international humanitarian aid. However, at the same time, he accused the United Nations agency responsible for distributing this aid (UNRWA) of being an arm of “terrorists”. He sent Washington evidence of the participation of 12 Agency employees in the October 7 operation. Without delay, the United States suspended its aid and convinced a dozen aid states to follow suit. Suddenly deprived of resources, UNRWA no longer has the possibility of transporting this aid to Gaza and distributing it.
Washington, which until now had pleaded for humanitarian aid to civilians, has therefore hardened its position by participating in the destruction of the appropriate United Nations agency. However, he pursues his dream of a “two-state solution”. By moving towards the dissolution of UNRWA, the West is depriving stateless Palestinians of the passports that only the United Nations can issue them. In fact, they also prevent the “voluntary” exile of this bombed and starving population that the European Union was already preparing to receive.
Emboldened by this support, 11 ministers from Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition appeared at a festive event, organized by Kol Barama radio at the Jerusalem International Convention Center. It was titled: “Israel Victory Conference – Settlements Bring Security: Return to the Gaza Strip and Northern Samaria.” Speakers, including Itamar Ben-Gvir, Minister of National Security and president of the Jewish Force (Otzma Yehudit) party, assured that there would never be peace with the Arabs and that only the colonization of the entire Palestine could bring security to the Jews. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, present on site, approved.
These belligerent remarks shocked the opposition to the coalition, whether outside the war government (like Yaïr Lapid) or within it (like Yaakov Margi or General Benny Ganz). Above all, they exasperated Washington, which reacted in two ways to this slap. First, he asked his associates not to receive Jewish supremacists (like Amichai Chikli, Minister of Diaspora Affairs, who was expected in Berlin), then he decreed sanctions against some of them. These measures are more important than they seem since they immediately prohibit any international fundraising and bank transfers. They should quickly weaken the Jewish supremacists and, in turn, favor the others.
We quickly learned that Washington had first considered including ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich on the list of people sanctioned before abandoning it. The latter then simply retorted that Joe Biden's accusation that West Bank settlers are violent is “an anti-Semitic lie spread among the enemies of Israel”.
Last modification 54 there is
Why does Macron want to push the world into war so much?
Why does Macron want to push the world into war so much?Equality and Reconciliation - 06 Feb 2024
Why the war? Why does Macron want to force the world into war so much? This is perhaps the question we should ask ourselves, to solve a problem we need to know the reasons. They are multiple but convergent.
Money laundering. The essential problem of a government is to bring money into its real economy. How ? for example the RMI, the money is given to the tramps who spend it immediately (the tramps do not capitalize) and thus cash flow is created for the economy. It's good but the amounts are ridiculous. On the same principle, the State votes for aid to Ukraine; the money is given to pawns who immediately spend it on weapons and thus create cash flow for the military-industrialist.
But the money supply of the real economy, you, your baker, the restaurant, the plumber, has a leak; namely capitalization and tax havens. When a rich person hides his money in the Caribbean, that means less money supply in the real circuit. And it is not a small flowing stream, nor a river, reader friend, a river nay, it is a river, the Amazon, it is the Gulf Stream.
- But when the State gives money to tramps, to the military industry, to farmers, where does this money come from? Creation ex nihilo, that is to say from nothing. Currency is created with one line on a computer. But who has this power? Who has the power to make lines of several billion thousand ports? Who is the good god?
The good God belongs to those who believe in him. Money exists because we believe in it. The need to believe is something else. To believe is to be active, not to believe is a passive position. The oxen do not believe. A population that believes in nothing is the dream of totalitarian power. The need to believe is real to build a civilization; No offense to Harari, the belief is real. See the factory of reality.
But back to why the war. Who makes money? This power has been taken from kings, it theoretically belongs to the nations, but this power has been taken from the nations. The power to create money lies with private banks. Private banks guarantee the value of the currency. But who guarantees private banks?
A little history, the real one. Since the end of the Second World War, since the Bretton Woods agreements; July 22, 1944, the FED – The Federal Reserve of the United States – manages the quantity of gold in the West.
As the money supply is perpetually reduced due to the Gulf Stream, it must be perpetually recredited, how? The banks make the cavalcade, this charging step of the horses of the Napoleonic army. Cavalcade in financial jargon is the act of paying a loan by taking another loan, which will be financed by another loan.
That is to say that the fortunes of banks consist of quantities of… credits. Banks only own debts, and with these debts, print notes that represent value.
This allows you to export currency and receive goods in return. This gave the West enormous financial power and allowed it to operate as a parasite on the global economy.
This debt-increasing mechanism is reaching a level where we have essentially put everything we own, including our homes and land, into debt to maintain our standard of living. We no longer own anything, now that the debt has been subtracted. The debt has long since become unserviceable – well beyond our ability to pay interest – which explains why interest rates in the West are near zero. Any increase would make the debt irreparable and we would all officially go bankrupt in a day. It is August 15, 1971, Nixon puts an end to the Bretton Woods regime, everyone knows that.
Nixon signs the Bretton Woods death warrant. Global currency can and should be produced in abundance, undermining confidence in the dollar. But the dollar, to recreate confidence, relies on the mechanism of the Quincy pact, the February 14, 1945 meeting of King Saud and Roosevelt. The pact mentions the protection of Saudi Arabia by US military force in return for which the Saud kingdom undertakes to sell its oil only in dollars.
This pact is fundamental because it contains the balance of the world. In fact, buying your energy in dollars is a guarantee that the dollar will always be in demand, and therefore always valid. By extension, the US and its army forced the world to trade everything in dollars, guaranteeing that the dollar would always be in demand. The United States places itself in the position of debtor towards the rest of the world, and lets other countries finance it by accumulating dollars, in concrete terms it is a position of predator, or parasite. Obama went so far as to impose the extraterritoriality of American law. That is to say, anyone who uses the dollar is under American law. Law entirely relative to whom it is exercised. These are the famous rules of the New World Order. “The world needs rules” croon all the puppets of power, these rules are only the orders of those in power.
This allows American banks – because the Fed belongs to a small conglomerate of private banks – to put the world in a straight line. To enslave the world, that's the plan. All nations refusing to submit are destroyed, fueling the US military industry. Double benefit.
Furthermore, the USA takes great care to divide, divide and rule, any group of nations that could come together to resist. Triple benefit. However.
Well, not everyone agrees.
