Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
macron goes to war

VoltairenetParis 2024 and Berlin 1936 in the service of an impossible imperial dream

Voltairenet - May 09, 2024

Thierry Meyssan: Emmanuel Macron has never had any respect for French culture.

   

During his first election campaign, he never stopped mocking her. His ambition included the presidency of the French Republic, but, in his eyes, it only took on meaning in the European Union. During his two mandates, he resolved few French problems, but patiently built the transformation of the EU into an empire of around thirty states.

In his mind, the next Olympic Games will be an opportunity to manipulate the masses to magnify the “United States of Europe” so that they will be spontaneously ready for the dissolution of the EU member states.

During his programmatic speech at La Sorbonne seven years ago, he declaimed: “A few weeks after the European elections [of 2024], Paris will host the Olympic Games. But it is not Paris which receives. It is France and with it, Europe which will bring to life the Olympic spirit born on this continent. It will be a unique moment of gathering, a magnificent opportunity to celebrate European unity. In 2024, the Ode to Joy will ring out, and the European flag will be able to be proudly displayed alongside our national emblems.”

Yes, the 2024 Olympic Games in Paris will be an opportunity for him to showcase his vision of the world: with each victory of a Member State, the European anthem should be played, if nothing hinders this plan. Without a doubt, the EU would then be the victorious power. He would thus realize the dream of Chancellor Aldolf Hitler in Berlin in 1936. He has already adopted the codes. Thus, the Olympic torch relay, which did not exist during the original Games, is a survival of Nazism. The German chancellor had wanted to magnify the bodies of the Aryans and cross the Balkans, foreshadowing his future conquests. The French president intends to mobilize the French behind his impossible European dream to better manipulate them in the weeks to come. He also entrusted the production of the torch to Usinor, now called ArcelorMittal, as his predecessor had entrusted it to the Krupp arms group.

Don't worry, I'm not comparing Emmanuel Macron to Adolf Hitler to imply that the French president would be racist, but this historical allusion will be useful following my remarks. For the moment, remember that there will be Russian athletes, but no Russian anthem, and no champion registered in the name of the European Union, but European anthems.

To understand the trap that is being prepared and into which we will all probably fall, we must retrace its previous steps.

During his speech on September 27, 2017, he declared: “We have turned the page on a form of European construction. The founding fathers built Europe away from the people, because they were an enlightened vanguard, because perhaps it could be done, and they moved forward and then proved that it worked. He then laid down the principles of a production in which we attended, sometimes participated, without understanding.

• On June 25, 2018, he launched the European Intervention Initiative. This was not an EU programme. At least half of the member states did not want it, including Germany. Also initially, only nine states participated, including the United Kingdom, which was leaving the EU. There are 14 of them today. This initiative is currently at work in the Persian Gulf (European Maritime Awareness in the Strait of Hormuz or EMASoH). It initiates a “capacity for autonomous action for Europe, in addition to NATO”.
Germany's European Mission was, according to the Nazis, to protect the people of Europe from Bolshevism. Today, the Mission of the European Union, according to Emmanuel Macron, is to protect them from Russia.

Understand: there was never any question of creating an army for the collective defense of member states. In fact, we are witnessing quite the opposite: the war in Ukraine is the pretext for gigantic arms transfers, so that today no member state has the means to defend itself for more than two days. if it was conventionally attacked by a developed state. Contrary to talk about strengthening military power, the French Ministry of the Armed Forces, according to the Court of Auditors, cut 3 military positions last year. Ultimately, we are already, and will become even more, dependent on the United States and the United Kingdom, i.e. NATO.

• On March 4, 2019, Emmanuel Macron published an op-ed calling for the creation of a “Conference for Europe in order to propose all the changes necessary to our political project”. It was to “bring together panels of citizens, audition academics, social partners, religious and spiritual representatives”. In order to define “a road map for the European Union translating these major priorities into concrete actions”. Note that President Macron wrote “these major priorities” with a “c” and not an “s”, in order to specify that the Conference had to express the means to achieve a goal that it would not choose itself, but which was imposed on him.

This is the resumption of the Great National Debate which followed the “Yellow Vest” revolt. 10 public meetings were organized, 134 registers of grievances were opened, 19 town halls participated, 899 detailed contributions were written. All this discussion and paperwork ended up in the trash.

• A few months later, the German Ursula von der Leyen presented the program of her administration on July 16, 2019, saying that “Europe is like a long marriage. Love doesn’t necessarily develop from day one, but it depends.”

From that moment on, the Élysée and the Brussels administration began to work on transforming the Union into an “Empire”, or more nicely said by communicators into a “federation”. It was clear that it would not be possible to pass this upheaval by referendum. Also, the Von der Leyen administration intended to proceed step by step: modify the adoption rules through a simplified procedure then, later, dissolve the member states and replace them with a centralized state.

• During his first term, President Emmanuel Macron visited each of the 28 EU capitals. It was his electoral campaign to justify his future appointment.

• From April 2021 to May 2022, 830 European “citizens” met to debate “The Future of Europe”. This conference, opened by President Emmanuel Macron, produced 49 proposals and 326 measures addressed to the presidents of the Parliament, the Council and the Commission.

First remarks: this presentation of the facts masks real problems. To give an appearance of legitimacy to the ongoing process, it is a matter of giving the illusion that the European Empire is not an idea coming from above, but an ardent desire of the European populations. We therefore speak of European “citizens” when there is no European State, no European people, therefore no “citizens” at all. The participants were drawn by lot, which gives the illusion of their representativeness and the legitimacy of their decisions. However, in practice, they were paid with our taxes even though they did not form a European institution. They adopted certain measures that they discussed for a long time, but also voted hastily for what Paris and Brussels wanted them to adopt and which goes against their interests.

• On March 25, 2022, the European Council, then chaired by Emmanuel Macron, adopted the Strategic Compass. This first defined threats, from which it drew the guidelines of its strategy. It led to the establishment of a Rapid Reaction Force of 5 men.

• On June 9, 2022, the European Parliament, after having adopted various texts relating to the Conference for the Future of Europe, adopted a resolution (P9_TA(2022)0244) convening a Convention for the revision of the Treaties, in application of Article 48 of the EU Treaty (Treaty of Nice).

• On March 10 and 11, 2022, Emmanuel Macron convened an informal meeting of the European Council in Versailles. The heads of state and government approved the creation of a support budget for Ukraine and the program for changing energy dependence.

[...]

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
the erasure of France

Equality and ReconciliationMacron or the erasure of France (extract SAPTR 26)

Equality and Reconciliation - March 16, 2024

Full episode available on VOD from Kontre Kulture: kontrekulture.com/produit/soral-a-presque-toujours-raison-episode-26-mars-2024/

   

Contents of this SAPTR #26

00:27 – Continuation of the “Fat Lesbian” affair
02:34 – Complaint from “French Jewish Youth”
07:08 – Macron or the erasure of France
15:47 – The destruction of a country by its language (1)
18:48 – The destruction of a country by its language (2)
20:24 – Rachida Dati or the negation of French culture
24:08 – Attal or the alliance of the star and the washer
28:40 – Attal vs Bardella: youthism versus youthism
37:14 – BHL and Yakovleff: the pathological denial of Russian victory in Ukraine
42:50 – Terroir and globalism: the peasant world fighting for its survival
54:00 – Highly symbolic: a family of farmers crushed by OQTF
56:44 – When Todd says (almost everything) like Soral
01h03:34 – Gaza or the great revealer
01h07:59 – The end of the Shoah annuity?
01h17:33 – The discredit of Zionist communication
01h25:38 – Youthism: identitarians are mental leftists
01h29:57 – When Julien Dray rediscovers himself Hebrew
01h33:12 – Neither forgiveness nor forgetting: the religion of hatred
01:37:26 – Ethnic cleansing has always been the Zionist project
01:46:29 – Israel's future can only be South Africa
01h51:26 – The return to the fundamentals of the left and the right
01h56:40 – The regained honor of Jean-Luc Mélenchon
02h04:51 – The useful inconsistency of LGBT
02h07:34 – The Zionist abjection of a certain Catholic right
02h12:26 – The consequences for the France of tomorrow?
02h16:29 – Solutions for the France of tomorrow?
02h18:31 – The Jewish community in the France of tomorrow?
02h23:12 – At the dawn of a third world war?
02h29:29 – On the unhappy conscience of the French far-right
02h35:02 – American elections: how to still steal from Trump in 2024?
02h41:49 – Make no mistake about the clash of civilizations

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Professor Trouposol addresses the nation

InsolentiaeFor your safety you will have war!

Insolentiae - March 16, 2024

Professor Trouposol addresses the nation.

   

Haaaaaa…. in the series Tintin at the Popovs (those who experienced the Cold War and the expressions of the time will understand), our professor Trouposol learnedly explained to us that for our security we had to think about waging war... otherwise we could have war .

As an emeritus member of the 7th company, with Chief Chaudard, on the ground, we have another perception of the situation.

You are sitting down I hope… no because the intro of the great chef is capable of making you fall to the floor!

“You are sitting,” he told reporters. “You wouldn’t rule out getting up at the end of the show”? So the ground troops are the same. So.

War is simple.

Simple as a good valve.

Simple as a “bon mot”.

The textbooks (not the Emmanuels eh) will therefore remember that the Third World War took place because Trouposol, that day did not exclude getting up. You will listen. It's lunar.

A Mozart of strategic ambiguity.

But that's not all…

Then Professor Trouposol explained to us that he produces 100 shells per day and 75 Caesar cannons per year, and I am happy as are our enemies the Russians to learn this. These are useful statistics for winning a war of attrition. Is there no one at the general staff to explain to Tintin at the Elysée that certain figures should not be given? Or we poisoned and he had to tell Professor Trouposol that we were going to release 2025 Caesar cannons from 750. There the Kremlin would have trembled.

Short.

According to Trouposol we must not be cowardly and we must prevent Russia at all costs from winning in Ukraine, which amounts to saying that we must make Russia lose.

If no one accepts at least a little loss then by definition there is no peace or negotiation possible, there is only more war.

Macron does not have the means for this adage. First with our 3 billion debts and we will come back to that, Professor Trouposol du Palais is not strong. Our army can potentially hold a front of 100 to 80km at high intensity for a week. A little short to challenge Russia. Obviously Trouposol's genius idea is to go there "as Europeans" with the other "friends".

So we do not have the wisdom to be strong.

Finally, the spoiled child of the Palace is not wise at all because engaging the army against Russia will require going through Parliament. And no, Macron cannot arrogate to himself the right to decide alone to take France towards war against Russia, in the same way that he cannot have the stupidity to try to make us believe that the interests vital “existential” assets of Europe are threatened in Ukraine. It's wrong. The borders of the European Union are known, also by the Russians. Attacking a member country of the European Union would be a casus belli. We completely agree on that.

Ukraine is not in the European Union. This may be very sad for the Ukrainians, but they are in no way in our vital interests and it is important to say what a potential clash with Russia means. We will not lose 50 or 80 soldiers over 8 years like in Africa. We will lose 50 to 60% of an expeditionary force of 10 men. This is the reality. We will have thousands of deaths, ending with the signing of a peace treaty. Absurd. Without wisdom.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Candace Owens

Equality and ReconciliationUSA: Candace Owens launches BrigitteGate

Equality and Reconciliation - March 13, 2024

USA: Candace Owens, the pretty Trumpist with 8M subscribers, launches BrigitteGate.

   

A little air of Rihanna, a black-Trumpist positioning, a successful podcast, a well-researched dossier (thanks F&D), and here is a magnificent launching pad at the heart of US politics. The Brigitte affair has just crossed the Atlantic, thanks to Candace Owens.

His podcast on YouTube has 3M subscribers, and his X account rises to 4,8M. Candace, more honest than mainstream French journalists, who pump and never cite F&D, cited and relayed her source.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Putin responds to the West and Macron

Réseau InternationalVladimir Putin responds to Emmanuel Macron

International Network - March 12, 2024

Consequences of Macron's statements.

   

“The West continues to lie and terrorize the world. Today, the West shamelessly claims that Russia intends to attack Europe. But you and I know they are talking nonsense.”

Vladimir Putin

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
macron goes to war

The Media in 4-4-2Send French civilians to war or prison

The Media in 4-4-2 - March 02, 2024

A law allows Macron to send French civilians to war or imprison them for 5 years and a €500.000 fine if they refuse.

   

Who remembers what happened in the National Assembly on August 1, 2023? The Macron government voted for the possibility of requisitioning goods and people "in the event of a threat", by decree in the Council of Ministers. The move raises concerns about its potential for abuse and restriction of individual freedoms. Especially since our President's completely crazy statements regarding sending ground troops to Ukraine...

Under the terms of this law, any person or entity, natural or legal, as well as any necessary goods or services, may be requisitioned if a threat, current or foreseeable, weighs on activities essential to the life of the nation. The government justifies this measure by asserting that it is crucial to deal with possible major crises, whether security, health or other.

This legislative text, integrated into the bill relating to military programming for the years 2024 to 2030, was adopted at first reading by the National Assembly on June 7, 2023. The deputies and senators met in a joint committee on June 6, 2023. July 14 to discuss a final version of the bill, with the government hoping to enact it around July XNUMX.

Art. L. 2212‑1
In the event of a threat, current or foreseeable (...) the requisition of any person, natural or legal, and of all the goods and services necessary to deal with it may be decided by decree in the Council of Ministers.

Art. L. 2212‑2
When Article L. 2212-1 is not applied, in the event of an emergency, if the safeguarding of national defense interests justifies it, the Prime Minister may order, by decree, the requisition of any person, natural or legal, of any goods or services.

Art. L. 2212‑5
Natural persons are requisitioned based on their physical & psychological abilities and their professional or technical skills.

Art. L. 2212‑6
In compliance with this title, the following may be subject to a requisition measure:
1° Any natural person present on the national territory
2° Any natural person of French nationality not residing on the national territory

Art. L. 2212‑9
Failure to comply with the measures legally ordered pursuant to articles L. 5-500.000 and L. 2212-1 is punishable by imprisonment of 2212 years and a fine of €2.

The essential elements of Article 23

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
liquidate Macron

Gendarme ProfessionThe Ukrainians planned to liquidate Macron in Ukraine

Profession Gendarme - February 20, 2024

Ukrainian authorities were planning an assassination attempt against French President Emmanuel Macron during his failed visit to kyiv.

   

It was this circumstance that caused the sudden cancellation of the French leader's trip.

“France24” notes that Macron's liquidation was prepared by the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Kirill Budanov, on the orders of President Vladimir Zelensky. The assassination plan was foiled by the former commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces Valery Zaluzhny, who passed information to the French through his channels. In Paris, the intelligence services had access to the correspondence of the organizers and perpetrators of this terrorist attack.

The Ukrainians planned to kill the French president during his visit to kyiv in order to cause an echo in the West, because they wanted to blame the assassination attempt on “Russian special services”. “Evidence” fabricated by Ukrainian intelligence had been prepared.

According to the organizers' plan, after the attack, the West was supposed to once again turn its attention to kyiv and increase its arms deliveries there. In kyiv, Macron intended to sign a bilateral agreement in the field of defense and security.

It was previously reported that the French president was going to visit Ukraine on February 13-14 and visit kyiv and Odessa. The Elysée has canceled the head of state's two-day visit for an indefinite period for security reasons. This trip was supposed to be entirely national and leadership for Macron, and not international and united. Since the creation of the Northern Military District of Russia, he has come to Ukraine only in the company of the heads of government of Germany and Italy.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Macron wants wars

Equality and ReconciliationWhy does Macron want to push the world into war so much?

Equality and Reconciliation - 06 Feb 2024

Why the war? Why does Macron want to force the world into war so much? This is perhaps the question we should ask ourselves, to solve a problem we need to know the reasons. They are multiple but convergent.

   

Money laundering. The essential problem of a government is to bring money into its real economy. How ? for example the RMI, the money is given to the tramps who spend it immediately (the tramps do not capitalize) and thus cash flow is created for the economy. It's good but the amounts are ridiculous. On the same principle, the State votes for aid to Ukraine; the money is given to pawns who immediately spend it on weapons and thus create cash flow for the military-industrialist.

But the money supply of the real economy, you, your baker, the restaurant, the plumber, has a leak; namely capitalization and tax havens. When a rich person hides his money in the Caribbean, that means less money supply in the real circuit. And it is not a small flowing stream, nor a river, reader friend, a river nay, it is a river, the Amazon, it is the Gulf Stream.

- But when the State gives money to tramps, to the military industry, to farmers, where does this money come from? Creation ex nihilo, that is to say from nothing. Currency is created with one line on a computer. But who has this power? Who has the power to make lines of several billion thousand ports? Who is the good god?

The good God belongs to those who believe in him. Money exists because we believe in it. The need to believe is something else. To believe is to be active, not to believe is a passive position. The oxen do not believe. A population that believes in nothing is the dream of totalitarian power. The need to believe is real to build a civilization; No offense to Harari, the belief is real. See the factory of reality.

But back to why the war. Who makes money? This power has been taken from kings, it theoretically belongs to the nations, but this power has been taken from the nations. The power to create money lies with private banks. Private banks guarantee the value of the currency. But who guarantees private banks?

A little history, the real one. Since the end of the Second World War, since the Bretton Woods agreements; July 22, 1944, the FED – The Federal Reserve of the United States – manages the quantity of gold in the West.

As the money supply is perpetually reduced due to the Gulf Stream, it must be perpetually recredited, how? The banks make the cavalcade, this charging step of the horses of the Napoleonic army. Cavalcade in financial jargon is the act of paying a loan by taking another loan, which will be financed by another loan.

That is to say that the fortunes of banks consist of quantities of… credits. Banks only own debts, and with these debts, print notes that represent value.

This allows you to export currency and receive goods in return. This gave the West enormous financial power and allowed it to operate as a parasite on the global economy.

This debt-increasing mechanism is reaching a level where we have essentially put everything we own, including our homes and land, into debt to maintain our standard of living. We no longer own anything, now that the debt has been subtracted. The debt has long since become unserviceable – well beyond our ability to pay interest – which explains why interest rates in the West are near zero. Any increase would make the debt irreparable and we would all officially go bankrupt in a day. It is August 15, 1971, Nixon puts an end to the Bretton Woods regime, everyone knows that.

Nixon signs the Bretton Woods death warrant. Global currency can and should be produced in abundance, undermining confidence in the dollar. But the dollar, to recreate confidence, relies on the mechanism of the Quincy pact, the February 14, 1945 meeting of King Saud and Roosevelt. The pact mentions the protection of Saudi Arabia by US military force in return for which the Saud kingdom undertakes to sell its oil only in dollars.

This pact is fundamental because it contains the balance of the world. In fact, buying your energy in dollars is a guarantee that the dollar will always be in demand, and therefore always valid. By extension, the US and its army forced the world to trade everything in dollars, guaranteeing that the dollar would always be in demand. The United States places itself in the position of debtor towards the rest of the world, and lets other countries finance it by accumulating dollars, in concrete terms it is a position of predator, or parasite. Obama went so far as to impose the extraterritoriality of American law. That is to say, anyone who uses the dollar is under American law. Law entirely relative to whom it is exercised. These are the famous rules of the New World Order. “The world needs rules” croon all the puppets of power, these rules are only the orders of those in power.

This allows American banks – because the Fed belongs to a small conglomerate of private banks – to put the world in a straight line. To enslave the world, that's the plan. All nations refusing to submit are destroyed, fueling the US military industry. Double benefit.

Furthermore, the USA takes great care to divide, divide and rule, any group of nations that could come together to resist. Triple benefit. However.

Well, not everyone agrees.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
One Attal for two Macrons

Equality and ReconciliationAppointment of Gabriel Attal: Juan Branco's manifesto

Equality and Reconciliation - 12 Jan 2024

Whatever one thinks of Juan Branco – who possesses a certain courage having earned him several times in the eye of the storm of the system – his testimony deserves to be read because he worked alongside our new Prime Minister for a long time and Much has already been written about him.

   

Five years ago, as part of a long investigation, I drew the portrait of a politician with baby teeth in whom no one was yet interested.

A certain Gabriel Attal.

It was 2018, and this book, entitled Crépuscule, demonstrated how the rise of Emmanuel Macron, far from the spontaneous democratic phenomenon, had taken root on an oligarchic fabrication that Attal would soon propel.

I described, in mirror image, their two journeys. We were in 2018, and this work, which offered an unprecedented insight into the way power was constructed in France, would immediately cause a scandal, seeing itself violently attacked by a press under orders that I knew intimately, and whose owners, panicked by secrets that I revealed, after having adored me, would spread throughout Paris claiming that it was all lies, resentment and deception.

Five years later, everything is there. Gabriel Attal, who was a nobody, a 28-year-old MP boosted by his lover, has just been appointed Prime Minister. And the confirmation of what was announced will have to question those who, throughout this period, will have blandly believed what they were told about this text, or will have remained silent for fear of being ostracized.

The publication of the work, with open access, was a real social phenomenon. Without any media coverage, a million people downloaded it. 500.000 listened to the audio version, then, once published in bookstores, 170.000 bought it.

This immense base, which saw itself told how democracy in France was only an illusion, quickly aroused concern and a frantic reaction from those in power, but especially from its relays, panicked at the idea that the truth had been made, not only on its beings, but on the way in which they were propelled. Let us remember that Aurore Bergé went as far as the Public Prosecutor, accusing me of having “armed the minds”. Do not laugh. The rest, we know it.

When the book was published - it was the fall of 2018 - the yellow vests had not yet set out, and Paris was cooing with love for this power that the rest of France abhorred. The omerta was such that the work would find no publisher for many months, circulating from hand to hand, in the pocket. However, weak signals were emerging. Gérard Collomb, overwhelmed by the Benalla affair, refused to do what was asked of him, and discreetly resigned from a power that he had created. For nearly two weeks, no one would succeed him, revealing a regime crisis which would be skillfully masked by the searches of France Insoumise and the inappropriate reaction of Jean-Luc Mélenchon. Like a child, caught red-handed, not believing what he saw, he would allow himself to be fooled by a spectacular intimidation operation whose sole purpose was to divert attention from what, in government, was happening. installed. Too frank, too innocent, he was that day, macronie, the perfect instrument.

The political crisis was averted, but the people were growling. Because France was collapsing. Early drug shortages accompanied a collapse in schooling, health and safety. This power, without legitimacy or origin, had no other choice but to plunder, and multiplied tax measures to, on the one hand, reward those who had done it, and on the other, make the remnants of the French.

No one recognized themselves in these beings who were supposed to represent them, patent liars who, claiming to finance the ecological transition, created a fuel tax to finance the CICE, a tax exemption for the wealthiest. Gabriel, who was then only a first-time MP boosted by his lover, therefore, Stéphane Séjourné, political advisor to the President, had obtained his constituency for small bribes, and was trying to make his way through this magma. He met his partner after being propelled at the age of 22 to the office of the Minister of Health Marisol Touraine by the graces of his daughter, alongside his future spouse Olivier Véran and Benjamin Griveaux. 6000 euros per month, driver and secretarial services for a young man who had not yet graduated - privileges which will now be guaranteed to him for life - that is something to seduce and excite.

With no professional background or qualifications to offer, we heard him laboriously defend two reforms, Parcoursup and the SNU in the National Assembly, alternating between the insignificant and the catastrophic. He stuttered slightly, and as always when he feared that his imposture would be revealed, or that his lies would be detected, let a crooked smile dominate him.

Gabriel was already going out of his way to get into the government, and these articles, in Macron, constituted powerful arguments. The rumor rustled among his fellow deputies. Powerful forces accompanied him. Barely elected, his first steps were immortalized in Paris Match. Nothing was said about who he was. A photograph reclining, cup of wine in hand, put him forward advantageously, talking about Fort Boyard and Orelsan, in the sun, in a lascivious pose, shirt open to the BHL, on the quays of Paris in front of the Seine and the Grand Palace. Paris Match, at 28? There are hundreds of thousands of readers every week. Every week, Gabriel, this summer, would be shown there.

How did he do it? Paris was rustling and beginning to wonder. Gabriel was rushing. It was that after having laid siege to his Versailles lover, Séjourné had arranged a meeting for him with Brigitte who in the government, with Blanquer had promoted him, and with Mimi Marchand and a few other pimps and traffickers, introduced him . It was they who, through maneuvering, had fabricated these articles that Paris Match and Bruno Jeudy were content to publish.

The months passed, and Gabriel Attal, as in all his positions, only made his unbridled ambition come true. The SNU, which he was in charge of, was collapsing, but the small cabinet he had been able to put together organized lunches and dinners for him with all of Paris. In a frenzy.

Gabriel had understood that for beings without quality, the solution was to run, and to run fast, jumping from morocco to morocco as he would go from spouse to spouse, imitating Emmanuel Macron, that is to say seeking his promotions before the slightest result can be attributed to it. Before the slightest failure could be attributed to him.

The posts passed, and the oligarchs came closer. Bernard Arnault gave his instructions to the Parisian, while Brigitte Macron called Marc-Olivier Fogiel to tell him to cover it. Flattering portraits flourished. Gabriel jumped in time on the spokesperson for the government that his new spouse was leaving, while Séjourné, in Brussels, saw himself exiled. Feeling the limits approaching, he once again fled to the budget ministry.

Like everywhere, he would leave without an assessment, even before having presented a budget. Minister of Education, he would see himself propelled to Matignon before a school year has been completed and any measure he announced has been implemented. What did it matter that the reforms on harassment, the certificate, the baccalaureate, had not been applied. That no law has been passed.

Agitation, movement and a large communications team - the only advisors who followed him everywhere deal with these issues: obsession, covering up the imposture and protecting oneself from its effects. Imitate the daron.

There is no need to recall what followed, from American tours to the Dutch Bildeberg, between two communication plans with influencers and confessional shows on the biggest television channels. The Marchand-Fogiel-Macron connection has allowed, in recent months, a bombardment on BFM TV which no one spoke about, and which had only one purpose: to prepare public opinion for the rise of the prodigy son of Elysée, modeled on Macron. The dinners with Crespo-Mara and Ardisson, from 7 to 8, will have prepared the way for what is today. It doesn't matter if everything is a lie. It doesn't matter that everything is invented. Today, Prime Minister, he is.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
macron emperor EU

Revolution 2030: Other sourcePhilippe de Villiers' troubling comments on Macron's future

Revolution 2030: Other source - January 11, 2024

Philippe de Villiers claims to know where our dear president is coming from, and that doesn't make one dream...

   

The people will have been warned. For a long time, certain wise individuals have been pointing the finger at the total power in the making of the unelected President of the European Commission. With Macron emperor of Western Europe in disarray, Elon Musk in support with his alternative media and his transhumanist Neurolink, Bill Gates at the head of the WHO and the management of pandemics, Soros at the migratory flows, etc., etc. . don't you see the 2030 Agenda coming in all its splendor 6.6.6?

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Brigittology

Facts and DocumentsFacts & Documents program — The lessons of the Brigitte affair

Facts and Documents - Dec 31, 2023

To follow the latest advances in “brigittology”. What the echo of the investigation reveals in French society and in the international media.

   

Official issue of the magazine Faits & Documents, a bimonthly 12-page letter founded by Emmanuel Ratier and written by Xavier Poussard, which essentially deals with political, economic and cultural news, French and international.

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
adding fuel to the fire - Naïm

NaimCeasefire or fuel to the fire?

Naïm - Nov 22, 2023

Naim's week

   

On the program: Macron who performs the shortest stand-up in history, the demonstration against "not political" anti-Semitism organized by politicians, the impartial mainstream media (50% for the Jews, 50% against the Arabs ).