Last modification 54 there is
Censorship: 18 months in prison required against the director of Rivarol
Censorship: 18 months in prison required against the director of RivarolEquality and Reconciliation - March 29, 2024
Repression is currently reaching unprecedented levels. You have to pinch yourself to believe it because the situation is becoming so ludicrous.
[...]
The same day, we learned that the non-contract primary school Saint-Pierre-Julien-Eymard, very close to Grenoble, was threatened with closure by the prefect of Isère following a viper report from the rectorate which inspected the traditionalist Catholic establishment, close to the Society of Saint Pius X, last January. According to the released Dauphiné, the state services gave the school management three months to comply with the law before pronouncing a temporary or even permanent closure of the establishment. But what has the management of this modest primary school done so abominably that it has been threatened with pure and simple disappearance, even though the very hostile mayor had already temporarily closed it for 24 hours in February, arguing erroneously of a serious inadequacy in terms of security of the premises?
The rectorate's report notes, clearly frightened, "single-sex and gender-specific physical and sporting activities, with football for boys and skipping rope for girls"!
[...]
In other words, schools where transsexuals come to urge children and adolescents to make themselves up, to cross-dress, to change sex, to carry out their gender transition, in short to mutilate themselves, often in an irreversible and oh so painful and dangerous way for their physical and mental health, for the salvation of their soul and for their life here on earth are perfectly consistent with the values of the Republic, with the republican order but not the rare private establishments which still provide traditional education and morality.
This is where we are in a country which was called the eldest daughter of the Church, which has so many saints, heroes and martyrs in its history, where so many churches and chapels still stand in our towns and cities. our villages, where oratories, calvaries, statues of saints and the Virgin dominate the crossroads of our streets, our paths and our paths or are placed at the top of our hills and our mountains.
Also on March 20, Passion Wednesday, your servant appeared before the XVIIth chamber of the Paris Criminal Court (press chamber) for three separate cases: a biting article by Jean-Philippe Robiquet published in Rivarol on September 6, 2023 and evoking the homosexuality of Gabriel Attal who had just been appointed Minister of National Education and which earned us an accusation of homophobia (one year in prison), an editorial from February 15, 2023 devoted to the speech by Élisabeth Borne , then Prime Minister of Macron, at the annual CRIF dinner for public protest of crimes against humanity (one year in prison also incurred) and finally a Rivarolian video posted on our YouTube channel on February 19, 2023 for “public provocation to discrimination, hatred and violence against a person or group of people on the basis of their origin or their membership or non-membership of an ethnic group, nation, race or "determined religion" and also for contesting the existence of one or more crimes against humanity (another two years in prison incurred).
At the end of a hearing taking place in a very hostile atmosphere and before an entirely female court (the clerk and the prosecutor were also what we formerly called persons of the same sex), Madam the public prosecutor filed a complaint against the director of Rivarol 18 months in prison (including revocation of nine months suspended prison sentence) and 15 euros fine. She explicitly refused any modification of sentence (electronic bracelet, community service or semi-liberty), despite the six minor children (including a fifteen-month-old baby), explaining that since your servant still did not understand, it was necessary to knock very strong, hatred towards homosexuals and Jews being perfectly intolerable.
However, the only hatred that we saw dripping during this hearing was his during his completely chilling indictment. In all, well over 50 euros are being demanded from the director of Rivarol since the two civil parties, the Jewish Observatory of France (OJF) and the National Bureau of Vigilance against Anti-Semitism (BNVCA) between them are demanding of 000 euros in damages, plus three legal publications at the defendant's expense in Le Figaro, Le Monde and Le Parisien, which adds, at least on paper, some 30 additional euros. Finally, the cherry on the cake, Sébastien Chenu, vice-president of the RN and the National Assembly, claimed through his lawyer, Me Alexandre Varaut, 000 euros in damages because Jean-Philippe Robiquet allegedly mocked his homosexuality in his article dated September 15, 000. This is where the Marinist RN is today but this will only surprise the naive.
Last modification 54 there is
The Canadian government wants to criminalize Christianity
The Canadian government wants to criminalize ChristianityDigital Dawn - March 08, 2024
Canada is moving to criminalize Christianity as the far-left Canadian government seeks to expand its "hate speech" laws to include key elements of the Christian faith.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government, controlled by the World Economic Forum, plans to outlaw Christianity, with Bible reading and prayer considered "hate speech", a "crime" punishable by a prison sentence.
Under the leadership of Trudeau, a young global leader of the WEF, the government is introducing an amendment to the Penal Code that could see believers sentenced to prison for expressing the historic teachings of Christianity.
Bill C-367 will make it illegal to repeat parts of the Bible.
By removing the “good faith” defense, the government will be able to prosecute Christians for what it considers “hate speech.”
Traditional Christian practices, such as celebrating Christmas or attending a religious service, will be considered crimes punishable by severe penalties.
The proposed amendment seeks to remove the provision that allows individuals to defend themselves by claiming that they sincerely believe and are merely expressing religious teaching already present in Scripture.
This means that invoking religious beliefs to justify words or actions that the state considers to be “heresy” will no longer be accepted as a valid defense under the law.
The bill states the following:
“The text modifies the penal code in order to eliminate as a means of defense against voluntary incitement to hatred or anti-Semitism the fact that a person, in good faith, has expressed or attempted to establish by an argument a religious opinion or subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text.
Last modification 54 there is
A stunning act of scientific censorship
A stunning act of scientific censorshipThe Defender - March 05, 2024
Journal retracts peer-reviewed study criticizing Covid-19 vaccine.
On Monday, the journal Cureus retracted the first peer-reviewed paper that presented an in-depth analysis of Covid-19 mRNA vaccine trial data and post-injection injury. The authors of the article also called for a global moratorium on vaccines.
On Monday, the journal Cureus retracted the first peer-reviewed paper that presented an in-depth analysis of Covid-19 mRNA vaccine trial data and post-injection injury. The authors of the article also called for a global moratorium on vaccines.
Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the authors of the article, called the retraction “a stunning act of scientific censorship.” He told the Defender:
“The journal and its editors had the right to reject the article at any time during the review process. Once published, retraction of an article without adequate justification constitutes a violation of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines.”
The document, published last month, describes in detail the serious potential harms of vaccines, problems in vaccine control and treatment, the mechanisms behind adverse reactions, the immunological reasons for vaccine ineffectiveness and the mortality data from registration trials.
The authors of the article concluded:
“The federal agency's approval of Covid-19 mRNA injectable products based on general population coverage was not supported by an honest assessment of all relevant registration data and by a proportional consideration of risks compared to benefits.
They also demanded that the vaccines be immediately removed from the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) childhood immunization schedule and that booster shots be suspended.
The document was read more than 350 times in the month following its publication. The average Cureus article is only viewed about 000 times in an entire year.
McCullough said Tim Kersjes, head of research integrity at Springer Nature, which publishes Cureus, informed the authors last week that the journal was retracting the paper. Mr Kersjes raised eight points of concern, which Mr McCullough said the authors had already addressed through an exhaustive peer review process.
Dr McCullough told the Defender:
“I suspect Kersjes and Springer Nature were pressured by the powerful bio-pharmaceutical complex, made up of coordinated public health organizations, vaccine manufacturers and regulators, to censor our article in order to prevent the medical community from obtaining crucial information about vaccine safety.
“We have rejected the retraction, we have appealed, and we will report this unethical action to all relevant authorities, while continuing to publish elsewhere.”
Mr Nathaniel Mead, the lead author of the article, told the Defender that he had feared from day one that the journal would come under pressure to retract the article.
I knew as soon as I hit the “publish” button on Cureus on January 24, following an extensive review process and multiple resubmissions, that we were dealing with a ticking time bomb.” , Mr. Mead said.
“By citing strong evidence and exposing how industry-sponsored trials misled the public, our evidence-based article was a true indictment of the COVID-19 vaccine company.”
“Predatory Retractions” Benefit Big Pharma
John Adler of Stanford University and Alexander Muacevic of the University of Munich founded Cureus in 2009. It is an open-access, peer-reviewed online general medical journal with Publication costs are low.
Academic publishing giant Springer Nature acquired Cureus in December 2022.
Springer Nature is a publishing conglomerate founded in 2015 through the merger of Nature Publishing Group, Palgrave Macmillian, Macmillan Education and Springer Science+Business Media.
The publisher generated €1,8 billion in 2022, showing continued year-on-year growth since 2020.
Springer Nature has an internal research integrity group responsible for ensuring that the company's scientific content is “rigorously evaluated”. When questions arise that require the intervention of “research integrity experts,” the resolution team, led by Mr. Kersjes, steps in.
On February 16, Mr. Kersjes informed the authors that the journal's editors planned to retract the article, saying that the journal “had recently been informed of several concerns regarding the validity of the work.”
According to the text of the email, posted on Substack by Steve Kirsch, another of the paper's co-authors, these concerns “cannot, in our opinion, be resolved by a correction.”
Mr. Kersjes told the authors that they had the option to accept or decline the retraction, which would be indicated on the website.
They did not agree. “We vigorously reject this arbitrary and capricious decision, taken after the fact, on the part of Mr. Kersjes and his superiors at Springer,” they wrote.
Mr. Kersjes' letter raises concerns about the authors' claims about all-cause mortality data, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the number of deaths due to vaccination compared to number of lives saved, the possibility of vaccine contamination, the claim that vaccines have not been adequately tested for safety and effectiveness, the “incorrect” statement that spike proteins remain in the body and can have harmful effects and that vaccines are gene therapy products.
In their rebuttal, the authors responded to each criticism by explaining their argument and providing supporting quotes. They noted that the paper's eight reviewers and the journal's editors found their responses satisfactory.
A few days after the initial publication, Mr. Adler, who is the editor-in-chief of Cureus, told the industry-friendly website Retraction Watch: “Our editorial response has been increased vigilance during the publication process. peer review, with 8 different reviewers weighing in on whether to publish, including a few with strong statistical backgrounds. Therefore, a credible peer review process was followed and the consequences fell as they should.
Mr Adler also said the journal would re-evaluate if “fatal flaws” were identified. “Cureus' decision-making process contrasts sharply with Elsevier's editorial decision to censor the article using ad hominem arguments.
However, a Cereus spokesperson told the Defender today: “Following publication, concerns were raised regarding a number of claims made in the article and an investigation by Cureus and the Springer team Nature's Research Integrity Charge identified several issues with the article that warranted a retraction”.
The spokesperson added: “It is preferable for such issues to be detected during peer review, but this is unfortunately not always the case. It is therefore important, as happened in this case, that when issues are raised after publication, they are addressed promptly in order to preserve the integrity of the academic record.”
The authors say in their rebuttal that most of the concerns “appear to be adapted, directly or indirectly, from the many comments made by well-known vaccine industry trolls on social media, Jonathan Laxton and Matthew Dopler,” who have frequently commented on the article on the Cureus website.
[...]
Last modification 54 there is
Mike Benz's historic interview with Tucker Carlson
Mike Benz's historic interview with Tucker CarlsonQuantum Leap – Feb 21, 2024
The National Security State and the Inversion of Democracy
The national security state is the primary driver of censorship and election interference in the United States.
A comprehensible and enlightening historical summary of information warfare.
“What I am describing is a military regime, it is the inversion of democracy. »
Last modification 54 there is
Massive search engine censorship: Test Mojeek
Massive search engine censorship: Test MojeekJacob's Ladder - Feb 19, 2024
Mojeek is one of the most interesting projects in the field of search engines.
And for good reason: it is one of the rare search engines compared to Google, Bing, etc.
Qwant, Ecosia, Duckduckgo… these are meta-search engines. They get their results from Bing. They are not search engines.
Mojeek builds its own search results, with its own robots that search the web.
And on top of that, the company behind it does not collect unnecessary data, does not analyze personal data, behavior, etc. and it is properly financed.
In short, a really good project (I talked about it in a little more detail here)
Obviously, due to its youth and limited means, Mojeek is not as relevant as Google. (and even more on search results in French)
Too often he doesn't find what I ask for.
That's why it's not my default search engine.
But recently, I found one strong point:
Mojeek is very good for finding small independent blogs/sites! And that even in French searches
Over the last few days, I've made a lot of little discoveries thanks to Mojeek. Discoveries that I didn't make (while I was doing the same search) on Swisscows (which uses Bing) or Qwant (which also uses Bing and a bit of its own index)
(for the curious: I did some research with the titles of books that I liked, to see if there were any blogs that talked about them)
Bing doesn't care about small independent blogs/sites!
You can't find them in the search results.
While on Mojeek, you can find them!
It's really cool. It's like discovering a part of the internet that's hidden!
Bing also tends to put results in English, whereas your search is in French (and you have configured the search engine so that it is in French)
Whereas if you set Mojeek to get you results in French, it will really get you results in French.
In fact, it gives the impression that Bing is trying to give you somewhat universal results, which could suit almost everyone, and at the same time exclude anything that is too “small” or “specific”
While Mojeek leaves room for the small and specific.
And that’s really cool!
Because that means you can discover new sites/blogs again with a search engine.
Last modification 54 there is
Censorship of Telegram channels the day Ukraine carries out a massacre in Belgorod
Censorship of Telegram channels the day Ukraine carries out a massacre in BelgorodInternational Network - Feb 17, 2024
by Christelle Neant
On February 15, 2024, while Ukraine heavily bombed the Russian city of Belgorod (killing several civilians including a baby), France censored around twenty French-speaking Telegram channels for “disinformation”. The timing of this censorship clearly indicates that Paris no longer wants the French to know that Ukraine is deliberately killing civilians with weapons supplied to it by Western countries.
In broad daylight on February 15, 2024, the Ukrainian army fired 18 rockets with Vampire multiple rocket launchers supplied by the Czech Republic (the range of the rockets used was 40 km). Russian anti-aircraft defense shoots down 14 rockets, but four continue their flight towards the city. The result is a real bloodbath. Six people, including a baby, were killed and 17 injured. As several people are in serious condition, the number of deaths could still change.
The targeted targets (a shopping center, a school stadium and other residential areas) are not military in nature, and prove once again that Ukraine is using Western weapons to commit war crimes, facts which disturb the Western narrative, so to prevent people from asking questions, France (along with Germany and Poland) decided to opt for the outright censorship of around twenty French-speaking Telegram channels which were allegedly “Russian disinformation”.
Last modification 54 there is
Brussels censorship relies on a new spy system
Brussels censorship relies on a new spy systemThe mail from the strategists - 28 Jan 2024
Persistent protests in France or Germany pose a threat to EU elites.
Discontent has reached the middle class and therefore the pillar of the national economy. The artillery in Brussels is getting heavier. The Digital Service Act establishes new authorities and a modern spying system to combat unwanted information. “Hate speech”, whatever that means, will now be an “EU crime”. This division of society will cost member states several million euros to implement and will completely overburden the authorities: in Germany alone, the Federal Criminal Police Office expects 720.000 suspicious cases per year, compared to 6.000 so far. All this does not interest the European institutions. They continue to put themselves at the service of the technostructure and its lobbying interests. Because the pretext control of the technostructure can only work with the tools of the technostructure, right?
It is now a model well known to all critical observers: “emergency situations” and “threat scenarios” proclaimed through elite networks are used by political decision-makers as a basis and justification for restrictive measures. and attacks on various freedom rights.
To control the sovereignty of interpretation, it is important to present such dangerous situations to political decision-makers (and to those who still want to become one). This is what happened, once again, at the World Economic Forum. The “Global Risk Report 2024” strongly warns of the greatest global risk – bad information.
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen caught this bullet during her speech in Davos:
“There will always be attempts at disinformation and misinformation intended to destabilize us. And we have never known as much as with Ukraine…Russia is not achieving its strategic objectives. It fails above all on the military level...Russia has also failed on the economic level. Sanctions have isolated its economy from modern technology and innovation. The country now depends on China. Finally, Russia has failed diplomatically. Finland joined NATO. It will soon be followed by Sweden. And Ukraine is closer than ever, on its way to the European Union. »
Flawless control
Let's leave aside the legitimate question of who is actually using disinformation. Let us instead turn to the question of why the global risk of disinformation cited by the World Economic Forum is so important for the EU.
The Commission is currently building its new super-authorities to ensure enforcement of the Digital Services Act (DSA). Last April, the European Center for Algorithmic Transparency (ECAT) was established in Seville to help the Commission and national authorities monitor compliance with the DSA. In particular, ECAT will carry out technical tests on algorithmic systems in order to understand how they work, as well as risk assessments linked to platforms and search engines. A cooperation agreement was signed for this purpose with the French center “PEReN” (Digital Regime Expertise Centre).
The European Commission is targeting “unwanted information” on the Internet and is introducing new state and supranational control bodies with essential powers to this end. To ensure the full (and timely) implementation of the DSA governance structure, Member States must designate their digital services coordinators and other national authorities responsible for ensuring compliance by 17 February 2024. It is therefore not surprising that a “risk situation” is required for lagging Member States to act. Indeed, according to the Commission's own information, only two Member States, Italy and Hungary, have to date validly designated their national authorities.
Collapse of justice
Germany is still working on the national implementation of the European Digital Services Act (DSA). The German Bundestag debated this issue for the first time on January 18. According to the federal government's bill, the Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) will be responsible for monitoring providers and enforcing the DSA.
In this context, the details that we do not like to talk about publicly are always interesting, and these are the implementation costs: thus, in Germany, the annual costs (!) for the Federal Network Agency are estimated at at least minus 17 million euros (personnel costs, IT, material costs and others). For the federal administration, the annual execution cost increases by around 8 million euros, to which is added a one-off execution cost of around 2,1 million euros.
But that's not all. Anyone who looks at the detailed explanations will find what they are looking for. The German Federal Criminal Police Office expects a significant increase in annual costs of around 44 million euros and one-off costs of around 21 million euros. Indeed, the Federal Criminal Police Office must receive reports concerning suspected cases of punishable content on the Internet and transmit them to the competent criminal prosecution authorities. Due to the significant expansion of mediation services subject to due diligence obligations, the Federal Criminal Police Office expects an increase in annual processing cases from around 6 currently to around 000 (! ).
This is where the cost estimates end – wrongly, because to be correct the additional costs for the prosecution authorities and the judiciary would also have to be calculated. If only part of the estimated 720.000 suspicious cases are prosecuted, German justice risks definitively collapsing. It has in fact been chronically overloaded for years and the number of untreated procedures has reached a record level.
Division of the company
However, the European institutions are not interested in the question of whether and how Member States can bear the costs of implementing the DAS. Nor are they interested in the capacity of law enforcement agencies to process the enormous number of new cases.
On the contrary, only last week the European Parliament made a new step forward in this area: the Council should take a decision by the end of the current legislature to include hate speech and hate crimes among the offenses referred to in Article 83(1) TFEU (referred to as “EU crimes”). The right to freedom of expression must not be used as a shield for the business model of social media platforms aimed at disseminating and amplifying hate speech, those around MEPs said.
The division of society by European institutions continues. Already, the “trusted reporters” provided for in Article 22 of the DSA, that is to say informants who monitor communications on online platforms and who intervene as soon as they suspect an infringement, are being formed. We know that some of them are part of the International Fact Checking Network (IFCN), a network which is itself affiliated with the Poynter Institute. Its funders include – among others – the Democracy Fund, the Lumina Foundation for Education, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the Omidyar Network Fund and the Open Society Foundations (OSF).
It cannot be warned and strongly emphasized enough: the EU elites have made the Brussels institutions auxiliaries of the interests of the technostructure. Because what they want to sell us as “control” of the technostructure, they can only achieve with the tools of the technostructure. Member States are overstretching their capacities and resources by implementing this policy – this is particularly true for judicial authorities. But when state power erodes and society divides, great misfortunes are brewing in Europe.
Last modification 54 there is
Deemed too radical, Alternatiba Lyon loses its subsidies
Deemed too radical, Alternatiba Lyon loses its subsidiesReporterre - Jan 05, 2024
The Rhône prefecture has removed Alternatiba's subsidy from Lyon, which it blames for its actions of civil disobedience. A now common practice to repress environmental associations.
With dry bread and water. The Rhône prefecture removed a subsidy request from Alternatiba, Mediapart revealed at the end of last December. This envelope of 3 euros was to be used to renovate the kitchen of the Lyon association bar of the environmental movement.
His cut was announced in May 2023, during the college meeting of the Fund for the Development of Associative Life (FDVA). According to a report obtained by the investigative media, the secretary general of the Rhône prefecture, Vanina Nicoli, indicated that she was withdrawing Alternatiba's subsidy request because of its "problematic position on civil disobedience" .
The senior civil servant would have referred to the republican engagement contract (CER), declaring that it implies “the duty not to undermine public order”. Since the Separatism law of August 2021, associations are required to sign the CER. Any breach of its values exposes them to the refusal of the subsidies granted. “We imagined it targeting associations categorized as “Islamist” or “separatist”, but the CER mainly serves to create a halo of suspicion around environmental associations,” notes Julien Talpin, sociologist at the CNRS and member of the Observatory of Associative Freedoms. .
“We don’t want to let ourselves be censored”
Contacted by Reporterre, the prefecture confirmed that it “did not wish to subsidize civil disobedience actions carried out by this associative structure”. She argues that “obtaining a grant is not a right” and that of the 593 applications submitted, only 283 were selected. However, according to Mediapart, Alternatiba's request was supported by a positive opinion from the prefecture's services.
Last modification 54 there is
Ivo Sasek: Total censorship – what next?
Ivo Sasek: Total censorship – what next?Gendarme Profession - Jan 02, 2024
Anyone who thinks that the total restriction of our freedom of expression and opinion on the Internet, planned from the year 2024, will put an end to this process of limitation is wrong – he still does not understand how our controllers work of opinion.
Total censorship on the Internet is only the first act of digital restriction, as the name DSA (Digital Services Act) already indicates. I had already predicted it in 2009, when we created our A4 sheet Express hand-to-hand newspaper, Le Voix et Contre Voix. (V&CV). This sparked a storm of indignation at the time. Censorship would never be possible in our free media, oh so social, it was said from all sides – I was treated as an unconscious amateur. My predictions were going to be confirmed, which is why we strongly reiterate here what we have observed since 2008 with our AZK archives and since 2012 with our Kla.TV archives. It is now a question of being or not being, dear friends. Listen !
Our world has unfortunately been under the influence of a bestial secret society for centuries.
And it will once again massacre entire peoples if we do not unite now to demand its head. And those who claim otherwise are lying. Whoever complicates this simple diagram of our primary global problem, deceives, seduces and thus paralyzes any necessary unified resistance, about which I will now say important things!
The fact is that this secret power elite wants by all means to prevent the world from knowing in what inconceivable dimensions it has lied to it, deceived it, stolen it and continues to do so. Since all censorship media and major platforms belong to this secret sect, they strategically separate the people from the free people responsible for information. They have deliberately pushed them into increasingly isolated Internet bubbles. We can only overcome them together. But first they put their DSA knife to the chest of their own vassals. The European Commission, for example, immediately banned TikTok from all business cell phones. Same thing in the United States, etc. But that was only the beginning. You understand ? Now all platforms must be systematically cleansed of anything that threatens this globally dominant cult. You understand ? It is therefore urgent to network physically, and not just digitally!
But let's come to the main question: what will happen after total censorship on the Internet? Answer: what this clan of world domination has already imposed at each previous stage of its international infiltration: total censorship at every level of free information! The obligation to adopt obligatory narratives as for Covid – this time under the threat of expropriation and the death penalty for the slightest deviation! And those who once again consider me an idiot who knows nothing will still testify to the accuracy of my words! Be part, if possible, of the global network of the Voix & Contre Voix newspaper. We spread exponentially, faster and more securely than online.
And now the most important...
Last modification 54 there is
The Schmilblick
The SchmilblickJean-Dominique Michel - Nov 18, 2023
Censorship and YouTube, crooked media and free media, not forgetting good old Schmilblick!
Uncensored information from Jean-Dominique Michel
Last modification 54 there is
ECH is becoming widespread and could help unblock blocked websites
Digital Dawn - Oct 12, 2023
Government attempts to block websites could be countered with this new tool.
The war against online censorship and surveillance has recently seen a tremendous development that could turn the tide in favor of freedom and privacy on the internet. Internet infrastructure titan Cloudflare has unveiled support for the Encrypted Client Hello (ECH) privacy feature, creating a sanctuary for free speech advocates and calling into question attempts to block sites already established.
For the uninitiated, as TorrentFreak reported, web blocking has been the entertainment industry's anti-piracy tool of choice for over a decade and a half. Used in over forty countries, this method involves Internet Service Providers (ISPs) blocking access to specific websites, often under a legal directive. After starting with rudimentary DNS blocks, the system has evolved, employing sophisticated Server Name Indication (SNI) eavesdropping techniques, or sometimes a mixture of the two. But it has also been used by governments to censor websites and block access to them.
However, the landscape has begun to change with the emergence of privacy-focused technologies, such as Encrypted DNS, that challenge these blocks. Today, the introduction of ECH is poised to revolutionize this field, rendering Internet Service Provider monitoring efforts virtually, if not completely, ineffective.
Simply put, ECH is an innovative privacy protocol designed to hide internet traffic and thwart surveillance efforts. Browser giants like Chrome, Firefox, and Edge have already given a nod to its implementation. However, for its potential to be fully exploited, websites must also integrate it. Cloudflare's decision to integrate ECH by default into all of its free plans, serving countless websites, represents a giant step toward widespread adoption...
Last modification 54 there is
John Clauser, Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 banned from conference!
Jacob's Ladder - August 07, 2023
He denounces the imposture of global warming. Acquiescence lights up the face. Refusal gives it beauty.
Prohibit a Nobel Prize in Physics from making the planned speech at the IMF because he does not agree with the globalist doxa? They dare. Not even afraid, neither of ridicule nor of being discredited.
A Nobel Prize in physics ostracized for having denounced the “corruption” of climatology
John Clauser, Nobel Prize in Physics 2022, denounces the "corruption" of climatology. A conference he was to deliver to the IMF was immediately cancelled.
At the beginning of the month, John Clauser, Nobel Prize in Physics 2022, sharply criticized the doxa of "the climate emergency". In his eyes, this “dangerous corruption of science threatens the world economy and the well-being of billions of human beings”. The penalty was not long in coming. He was supposed to give a lecture on climate models to the IMF – it was immediately canceled and the page announcing the event disappeared from the IMF website.
This conference, scheduled for next Thursday, was entitled "How much confidence can we place in the IPCC's climate predictions?" Let's talk about it. A dubious answer was, apparently, not politically correct. John Clauser has long been critical of climate models; he notably regretted that the 2021 Nobel Prize had rewarded work on this subject. He is not alone – many scientists believe that climate models are essentially based on mathematics and the number of their incorrect predictions suggests that they do not deserve the recognition of pure science at the highest level. Opinion not shared by National Geographic magazine, as evidenced by an article entitled "How climate models became so accurate that they won the Nobel Prize".
