In an era where information is abundant but often manipulated, where the media seem to dictate reality, a concept emerges, that of the "Mediaverse", developed by the philosopher Alexis Haupt. In this era of hyper-connectivity where everyone can access a plethora of information in just a few clicks, a crucial question arises: what prevents individuals from freeing themselves from the Mediaverse?
At the heart of the Mediaverse lies a fundamental lack: that of the will to know. The media, controlled by special interests, distort reality and manipulate the masses. In this parallel universe, the real issues are obscured, relegating essential subjects to the background.
In the Mediaverse, sensationalist statements from certain organizations, such as the WHO, are amplified, diverting attention from the real issue. For example, an alarming increase in cancer cases will be attributed to superficial causes such as pollution, alcohol and cigarettes, while deeper, systemic factors are overlooked.
But the Mediaverse goes beyond the simple manipulation of information. It shapes individuals' perception of reality, creating a dichotomy between what is presented by the media and what is experienced in the real world. People trapped in the Mediaverse deny the realities evident before their eyes, preferring to believe what is presented to them by the media.
The psychology of individuals prey to the Mediaverse is intriguing. Their perception of reality is distorted, and they may deny the most blatant facts to adhere to a predefined narrative. Even when hard evidence contradicts media narratives, they choose to ignore it, preferring to live in a comfortable illusion.
It is crucial to recognize the dangers of the Mediaverse. By focusing attention on superficial issues or distorting reality, it distracts from the real issues. For example, concerns about distant political figures can obscure closer, more pressing threats that affect individuals on a daily basis.
We are pleased to inform you that Profession-Gendarme appears very prominently in the center of this map.
As we are people with a minimum of education, for once we feel obliged to warmly thank dear Rudy for not having forgotten us.
We invite you to consult its publication with the map cited above on the following link: https://www.conspiracywatch.info/conspiracymap/#/graph
A big thank you to very dear Rudy Reichstadt for having worked hard for us and thus allowing us to consult the most important sites in the defense of our Freedoms and the Truth.
To find out more about his “methodology and approach” itself qualifying his work of information and critical monitoring as being rightly “WITHOUT EQUIVALENT” we invite you to follow this link: Mapping the French-speaking conspiracy web: methodology and approach
Through this publication “Rudy” seems to be doing what we call self-satisfaction, that is to say satisfaction with himself. (Synonyms for self-satisfaction: vanity, conceit, pretension, smugness, triumphalism, infatuation)
Let us also not forget the taxpayer's money that he easily earned and diverted for his own benefit, such as the Marianne Fund, among others.
As Le Monde Diplomatique explains, around forty large groups, families or individuals have access to almost all the media in France. Among them are a number of billionaires and wealthy industrialists. Based on this observation, there are therefore clear conflicts of interest.
Today, according to Media Crash of Oxfam, which quotes Julia Cagé: 9 billionaires own more than 80% of the media in France. These 9 billionaires are:
- Bernard Arnault: Les Echos, L'Opinion, Le Parisien, part of the Perdriel Group (Challenges, Sciences and Future)
- Patrick Drahi: BFMTV, RMC, L'Express, Liberation i24
- Xavier Niel: Le Monde SA (Le Monde, Télérama, Courrier International, L'OBS, Le Monde Diplomatique, Huffpost), NJJ (Paris Turf, Nice Matin, Var Matin, Monaco Matin)
- Daniel Kretinsky: Le Monde SA (Le Monde, Télérama, Courrier International, L'OBS, Le Monde Diplomatique, Huffpost), Elle, Marianne, Télé 7 Jours
- The Dassault family: Le Figaro, Le Figaro Magazine
- François Pinault: The Point
- The Bouygues family: TF1 group (TF1, LCI, TMC, TFX)
- Arnaud Lagardère: Paris Match, Hachette Livre, the JDD, Europe 1
- Vincent Bolloré: Canal + Group (Canal +, C8, CNews), Prisma Media (Capital, Current Woman, Télé Loisirs, GEO, Here, Gala), part of Lagardère (Paris Match, Hachette Livre, JDD, Europe 1 ), France Catholic
Indeed, among the 6 main general national dailies sold in France, 4 are controlled by billionaires. The Dassault dynasty, specialized in armament aviation, therefore owns the Figaro. The echoes are held by Bernard Arnault, the richest man in France. And despite independence funds for the press, the extremely wealthy Xavier Niel and Patrick Drahi keep control of Le Monde and Liberation respectively. Only Humanity and the Cross retain a relative autonomy.
This is the work of a polytechnician by training, who became an entrepreneur and a pilot, David van Hemelryck. The latter chose this mode of action simply to raise awareness among the French about the existence of a process of impeachment of the President of the Republic. A dismissal that he calls for, unsatisfied with the state of the political and democratic system of France at present. An action that he would like to see triggered beyond political chapels, partisan quarrels or divergent ideologies and of which he explains the necessity in his eyes within a website.
(see the rest of the article after the video)
Which is not to the liking of the German government, because Alina Lipp is very popular, a little too much moreover, she has no less than 167 subscribers on Telegram messaging that the news sites take up very widely.
But what is Alina's crime? The latter had the impertinence to qualify Ukraine's war crimes in the Donbass, which have taken place since 2014, as "genocide". She faces up to three years in prison. Far from stopping there, the German government closed his bank accounts, as well as those of his father in order to dry up his income which allows him to inform the German population.
But the relentlessness does not stop there. She posted a message on Telegram saying that “Denazification has begun”, in reference to the incursion of the Russian army against the soldiers of the Azov battalion, supported by the Zelensky regime, who do not hide their adoration of Hitler , as well as Nazi Stepan Bandera. After these remarks, the Public Prosecutor's Office is investigating a "criminal" act, considering that the journalist ""encourages or tolerates crimes regulated by the Criminal Code, and that the Russian invasion supported by Alina Lipp would constitute a crime under international criminal law. ".
Instead of carrying out the investigation without conflicts of interest and in a distanced way, in the service of public affairs, many of these actors have recycled themselves in what Lowenthal calls the “fight against disinformation”.
A pattern that is well known to readers of France-Soir with the report of the Twitter Files, the episodes of which have been published in our columns since December 2022. These internal documents of the blue bird were unveiled by Elon Musk. They have enabled investigative journalists to uncover several major scandals. These show the extent to which both free information and freedom of expression are threatened, due to the growing influence of political power: it is indeed on the pretext of this fight against disinformation that the latter exercises censorship.
This mechanism is not only at work across the Atlantic. Changes in the European regulation of digital platforms (the Digital Services Act) raise the same fundamental questions: to what extent can politics interfere with the sphere of information? Ultimately, can we then speak of a sort of “industrial mechanism of censorship” with a view to controlling the latter?
A new episode of the Twitter Files produced by Lowenthal himself addresses this subject and will soon be mentioned by France-Soir.
In the meantime, here is an exceptional text by the essayist which reports on his aforementioned observations and which exposes a new form of manipulation of information. This is essentially based on this mix of genres as surprising as it is serious between actors who should never collaborate together because of obvious questions of ethics: academics, members of NGOs, journalists with politicians, industrialists and soldiers.
For my part, and having life insurance, I contacted my insurer and asked him if I was covered; his answer was simple and clear, namely that it was an injection in the trial phase, that by accepting I was putting myself in the situation of a voluntary participant in a medical experiment and that this was not expressly mentioned in my contract !
This being so, it was for me an individual approach and decision that I only brought to the attention of those who asked me if I was injected and who, faced with my negative answer, asked me why; in the same way that I didn't ask anyone, neither in my family nor among my friends, if they were vaccinated or if they had vaccinated their kids or their parents... trying not to confuse the medical with something that looked a little too much like social pressure, moreover the leaders, the "doctors" and the journalists were not mistaken, speaking of social distancing and not of medical distancing!!!
Note: the following was partly published on Réseau International in August 2021, then updated in November 2021. I have just updated it again (mainly in reference to dates, not content) as we have come to hear interesting positions, namely that the non-injected should have informed the injected!!!
According to comedian and political commentator Russell Brand, debates over Elon Musk's recent takeover of Twitter have raged between free speech advocates who welcome the deal and neoliberal Democrats who worry about a only billionaire controlling the platform.
In his latest video, Russell Brand raises questions about Musk's plans for Twitter that neither side asks.
Brand argues that the media landscape has changed. Today, many journalists and media personalities are increasingly opposed to freedom of expression.
Michel DOGNA's Newsletter
Those who have not yet understood that one should not rely on telelie which is driven by the AFP alone (the voice of the globalist enemy) to find out what is really happening are really out of the game.
Although there is imminent great atomic danger from two dangerous psychopathic killers Z (UK) and M (FR) devoid of any conscience and empathy that the sinking Nazi-Satanist "deep state" uses to effect the dirty work of the last card to play, I will content myself here with total confidence in the invincible Russian military technological advance and in the great strategic intelligence of Vladimir Putin.
We are therefore not talking here about falsely rebellious titles like Le Canard Enchaîné or Charlie Hebdo. In a few months, several periodicals of the national, popular, social, identity and European Opposition find themselves in difficulty.
Hale, a 34-year-old former Air Force signals intelligence analyst, is serving a 45-month prison sentence, following his Espionage Act conviction for leaking documents classifieds on the US military's drone assassination program and its high civilian death toll.
The documents are said to be the source of "The Drone Papers" published by The Intercept, October 15, 2015.
Hale is one of several dozen people of conscience who have sacrificed their careers and freedom to inform the public about government crimes, fraud and lies. Rather than investigating revealed crimes and holding accountable those who committed them, the two ruling parties are waging war on anyone who speaks out.