Certainly, many courageous whistleblower doctors have already noted for a long time the uselessness and even the dangerousness of many medications. Let us think of Professors Philippe Even and Bernard Debré and their Guide to the 4 useful, useless or dangerous drugs which earned the radiation of the first and the public vindictiveness of the second. Not even to mention the recent health crisis, which statistician Pierre Chaillot recalls was a pandemic of... people testing positive!
So headlines the press, probably repeating an AFP press release, itself probably remotely controlled from the top of the State, announcing to us at the very beginning of the ENT diseases of the coming winter.
WHO global takeover: beware of the new international health regulations and pandemic treaty, a health tyranny never seen before in human history.
UK Member of Parliament Mr Andrew Bridgen denounces WHO's new International Health Regulations (IHR) and Pandemic Treaty as an unprecedented power grab – depriving WHO's 194 member countries, the world , their sovereignty over national health issues.
The new International Health Regulations and Pandemic Treaty would shift the power to decide what a pandemic is and what requires Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHICP) status, and literally how any health matter should be addressed to the Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO) – an unlimited term of diktat.
The Director General of the WHO can decide on an outright ban, accompanied by sanctions, of the use of drugs "prohibited by the WHO", even if their effectiveness has been duly proven. This is precisely what happened during the so-called COVID-19 pandemic. Doctors and pharmacists were not allowed to prescribe, recommend and sell drugs effective against COVID, as the WHO prohibited it.
This power of the WHO would be expanded as international law, or rather as “Rules-Based Order”, the tyrannical new concept chosen by the elite, to literally circumvent all national and international laws.
Both the IHR and the Pandemic Treaty will be put to a vote at the next World Health Assembly, May 21-30, 2023. The vote is scheduled for May 24, 2023. A two-thirds majority is needed for the treaty to pass. be adopted by the 194 members of the Assembly.
Watch this 20-minute video of Mr. Andrew Bridgen, British MP, explaining to the UK Parliament why the new WHO IHR and pandemic treaty must be voted down.
She nevertheless admitted that the covid epidemic was at a very low level. In addition, according to her, 86% of nursing staff took their first booster dose (i.e. 2 out of 4 doses in all) in nursing homes and 89% in private practice doctors. The desired reintegration would concern only 1 nurses out of 000 unvaccinated caregivers. The government, through the mouth of Minister François Braun, has indicated that it will follow this recommendation.
The next day, the national union of nursing professionals reacted with virulence. Here is an excerpt from the SNPI press release, which opposes HAS's recommendation to reinstate non-vax staff in hospitals and nursing homes.
Alexandre Penasse: In your book, you indicate that the health episode is based on two axioms: first, Nils Ferguson's computer reference in the modeling of the epidemic; secondly, the conclusion that the only way to fight against the spread of the virus is to reduce the number of contacts. It was the beginning of the “narrative”. What about this matrix in which we have entered?
Vincent Pavan: Ferguson's numerical simulations will justify decision-making, particularly in France. Ferguson is a crook introduced in the academic world, who was already working at the WHO in 2009, at the time of the H1N1 flu. This fiasco was a bit of a dress rehearsal for what we experienced with the covid. A commission of inquiry appointed by the Senate had concluded that his predictions were false. Again, his false simulations supported government decisions. Epidemiology cannot be modelled. The complexity in the transmission of the virus completely escapes us and is not likely to fit into a “Newtonian” epidemiology. “Contactless” is not based on anything. It was used to separate people from each other, to impose the mask and "social distancing", to make this atrocious publicity of the child who will kiss his grandmother and thus send him to die in the hospital. This is not a health problem but a health pretext.
Ariane Bilheran: Yes, the political crisis manifested itself in the apology for the state of exception, a notion that we owe to the philosopher Giorgio Agamben, who moreover reacted immediately. He explains to us that something abnormal is happening in contemporary states: in the name of a real or supposed emergency, the proclamation of a state of exception makes it possible to suspend or suppress our fundamental rights. This raises two questions: 1) Do we have the right, in the name of necessity, to suspend human rights? Political philosophy has answered in the negative. 2) Was the necessity really one? Was humanity really in mortal danger? The state of exception is totalitarian, like Nazism, which operated by decrees but never in the logic of law. When politicians begin to forbid debate, controversy and differing opinions, we are no longer in a democracy.
Let's not allow ourselves to be used for the umpteenth time to reach a decision already taken by the president on the pretext of a delay on Belgium or another country in which the heavy excesses are however very often reported.
"Euthanasia will be one of the essential instruments of our future societies in all cases. In a capitalist society, killing machines, prostheses that will eliminate life when it is too unbearable, or economically too expensive , will emerge and become common practice. »
Because yes, you will not cut it: you will be afraid of running out of heat, food, light. You will be afraid that Europe will be irradiated or that a nuclear conflict will break out.
Our elites remind us, through their incredible talent for forecasting, that to govern is to foresee, you are going to see what you are going to see.
Moreover, we have seen: having been able to predict – with unparalleled brilliance – that France could largely do without nuclear power thanks to its battery of windmills and small solar panels, our formidable politicians are now very gradually coming to the conclusion that the first months of 2023 could be marked by as much tension in the streets as there will be none in the EDF cables.
The plan is clear. In 30 minutes, this explosive video documentary takes up all the evidence proving the existence of the "plandemic" that has been collected since the start of the Covid (Except perhaps for the Frenchies, the fact that the health emergency law has been tabled on December 6, 2019 by a pro-Agenda 2030 senator), a covidist who would not renounce his worship after this is simply irredeemable.
After some minor changes to the International Health Regulations approved at last month's meeting, the WHO and member governments are working on far-reaching new amendments to the global rules. These will be presented in September.
At the same time, WHO leaders and member governments are crafting a new international pandemic treaty. This impending international agreement, which is still being drafted, is expected to give sweeping new powers to the WHO if approved.
“This is yet another totalitarian takeover by the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], the WHO, Bill Gates, Big Pharma, the biowarfare industry , the People's Republic of China and others, who want to impose their medical tyranny on the human race”