Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
bulletin n°22 from Amélie Paul

Amelia PaulAmélie Paul investigates the Molochs

Amélie Paul - Apr 24, 2024

The News of The Brutal Truth #22

   

In this new brutal truth news bulletin, Amélie Paul dives into the darkness to tell us about the molochs of the contemporary world. To do this, she gives us a history lesson going back to the ancient Greeks, precursors of the LGBT movement and Olympic champions of bad parental decisions, who are often portrayed as having sanctioned pedophilia. Amélie reveals the darkest secrets of our world: prepare to be shaken and maybe even frightened...

“Is it really any wonder that there is now a global agenda for children to be introduced to the complexities of gender, sexual orientation or masturbation before they even understand mathematics? Popular culture has been totally perverted to infiltrate the souls of youth and offer them up as sacrifices in the annals of musical history. »

Amelia Paul

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
quick mental arithmetic

New WorldRapid mental arithmetic at the end of primary school

New World - Apr 10, 2024

In the Hautes-Pyrénées no calculators! … just the fingers to reach “heights”

   

Who said mental arithmetic was boring for students?

Demonstration of different CMR (Rapid Mental Calculation) techniques used at the Sainte-Bernadette school in Tarbes in CM1-CM2. The gestures are unique to us. It is freely adapted from the Indian "abacus finger" gesture. The addition techniques and the spelling of numbers are inspired by those of Scott Flansburg, most of the other techniques are personal to our school: we have adapted them to children from Trachtenberg techniques or Vedic techniques.

These children are not gifted but ordinary children. And above all, everyone succeeds, including children who were still in difficulty 6 months ago. This result is achieved thanks to a professional and passionate teaching team.

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Ukraine child abuse

International ReportersUkraine: blackmailing children to make them commit crimes

International Reporters - April 05, 2024

A teenage girl from the DPR (Donetsk People's Republic), whose father was recently captured by the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the front, told us how Ukraine, using blackmail and threats against her father, wants to force her to give information and pressure her to commit crimes.

   

It all began for Elizaveta and her mother Anastasia, with a long, agonizing wait. After a call from Elizaveta's father (who serves in the Russian army) on March 8, she and her mother found themselves without news of him, despite the reassuring words of the commander, who assured that everything was fine. Then on March 26, 2024 it was horror. Elizaveta is called by a stranger, named Andreï, who says he is part of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

The man explains to the young girl that her father has been taken prisoner, that he is alive and in good health, at least for the moment... Because if the young girl wants her father's situation to not get worse step, she must provide the Ukrainian soldier with a certain amount of information: a photo of her passport, her address, the places she frequents, the organizations she is part of, the list of activists who are part of them, etc.

Initially totally panicked by the situation, and paralyzed by fear, the young girl understands that the information that the Ukrainians ask her will then be used to threaten her, as well as those close to her, so that she works in the interest of kyiv and betrays his homeland and his people.

The activists of the organization of which she is a part could become assassination targets like those who struck Daria Douguina, or Vladlen Tatarski if the Ukrainians obtained the list. They also ask if she has any relatives other than her father who serve in the military. It is not difficult to understand that her relatives could become targets for kyiv, or Elizaveta could be pushed to spy on them, or question them to obtain secret military information which she will pass on to Ukraine. Which could lead to bombings of military installations, and the death of Russian soldiers.

And the horror hits us when Elizaveta reveals that at one point her interlocutor asked her where she is going to work in the summer in children's holiday camps. A week after the terrorist attack on Crocus City Hall (in which 144 people were killed, including five children), organized with the help of Ukraine (the investigative committee found evidence of links between the terrorists and Ukrainian nationalists), one can only shudder at the thought of what the Ukrainian secret services planned to do in the pioneer camps where Elizaveta plans to work for the summer, once they had taken under their control.

But fortunately, Elizaveta, once the initial panic has passed, will make, with the help of her mother, the right decision: above all not to give them information that would allow them to blackmail her and make her commit crimes, and contact the authorities, hoping that the media coverage of his story will help protect his father and speed up his return home.

[...]

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Jewish terror

Réseau InternationalLaurent Guyénot: The fear caused by the Jews and their “God of terror”

International Network - March 30, 2024

“It’s time for Jews to be feared!” Rabbi Shmuley said recently. Jews, who failed to overcome anti-Semitism by trying to be loved, respected or admired, must now make themselves feared. This is the new watchword.

   

The problem is that if Jews want to be feared, they must also accept being hated. “Fear of the Jews” can be literally translated as “Judeophobia” (from the Greek phobos, to fear). To be feared, you must have the power to do harm, and you must prove it. So if Jews want to be feared in order to combat anti-Semitism, then anti-Semitism has a bright future ahead of it.

This all doesn't make much sense. But it's very biblical. To my knowledge, the Hebrew Bible does not recommend that Jews strive to be liked by non-Jews. On the contrary, Yahweh said to his people in Deuteronomy 2:25:

“Today and henceforth I will fill the people under all heaven with fear and terror toward you; whoever hears of your approach will tremble and writhe in anguish because of you.”

If Yahweh wants to sow terror among non-Jews, doesn't that make him a terrorist, or the god of terrorists?

This is the case, and this makes Zionists good Yahwists. In his 1951 memoir, “The Revolt,” Menachem Begin boasted of “the military victory at Deir Yassin,” as news of the massacre of 254 villagers (mostly unarmed men, women and children) immediately led to the “mad and uncontrollable stampede of 635 Arabs. (…) The political and economic importance of this development can hardly be overestimated”000. Was Begin not a worthy servant of his national god?

What Netanyahu is doing today is more than 130 times Deir Yassin. And the goal, once again, is not just to kill indiscriminately, but, in doing so, to terrorize millions of Palestinians into leaving “voluntarily.” This explains why they allow so many images of the martyrdom of Gaza to filter through: it is a public crucifixion, intended for everyone. (Andrew Anglin suggested another reason, not contradictory to this one).

One of Netanyahu's favorite Bible stories is the Book of Esther. He mentioned it in 2015 before the US Congress, as an argument to justify that America should bomb Iran2. The book of Esther is important for understanding how Jews want to be feared. Under the influence of his minister Haman, the Persian king Ahasuerus published a decree of definitive solution concerning the Jews of his kingdom, because "this people, and he alone, constantly opposes every nation, perversely following a strange way of life and laws, and is ill-disposed toward our government, doing all the evil he can to prevent our kingdom from achieving stability” (3:13). But thanks to Esther, the secretly Jewish wife of Ahasuerus, the Jews reverse the situation and obtain from the king that Haman be hanged with these ten sons, and that a new royal decree be promulgated, which gives the Jews "permission to destroy, massacre and annihilate any armed force of any people or province which may attack them, their women and children, and plunder their property” (8.11). This is how the Jews massacred seventy-five thousand people. Throughout the land, the book concludes, “there was joy and gladness among the Jews, with feasts and feasts. Many of the population of the country became Jewish, because from then on the Jews were feared” (8.17).

This story is very important to Jews, because every year on Purim they celebrate the hanging of Haman with his twelve sons, and the massacre of 75 people, including women and children.

According to the conclusion of this story, the fear of the Jews produces new Jews, that is, Gentiles who become Jews out of fear of the Jews: "many became Jews, since now the Jews were feared." Or, in a more literal translation: “many people became Jews because the fear of the Jews fell upon them.” As I said, fear of Jews is more likely to produce anti-Semites than new Jews. However, there are many examples of people who become Jewish out of fear of Jews: any non-Jewish politician who has ever put a yarmulke on his head and sworn eternal loyalty to Israel fits this profile.

There is another story in the book of Joshua that goes along the same lines. At the beginning of chapter 2, Joshua, who receives his orders directly from Yahweh in the Tabernacle, sends two spies to the city of Jericho. Having been spotted, they hide with a prostitute named Rahab. She helps them escape in exchange for being spared with her family when Israel attacks the city, because, she says, "we are afraid of you and all the inhabitants of this country have been seized with terror at your approach » (2:9).. Because Israel is so terrifying, it assumes that "Yahweh your God is God."

The French Catholic Bible of Jerusalem adds a footnote saying that "Rahab's profession of faith in the God of Israel made her, in the eyes of more than one Father of the Church, a figure of the 'Church of the Gentiles, saved by his faith'. I find the idea of ​​making the whore of Jericho a symbol of the Church perplexing because, out of fear of Israel, she converted to Israel's god and helped Israel commit genocide in her own city ( “men and women, young and old, including oxen, sheep and donkeys, all were slain” (Joshua 6:21).

On the other hand, it is a good metaphor for the complicity of the Christian world in the Israeli genocide of Gazans. There is no doubt that among most Christians today, fear of the Jews is far stronger than pity for the people of Gaza. And the heads of state of most Christian nations would rather start World War III with Russia than criticize Israel. Russia is, after all, a rational enemy, while no one knows what a psychopathic Israel is capable of.

Israel is the only country that openly threatens to blow up the planet. They call it the Samson option. The Samson option is the combination of Israel's nuclear capability and Israel's reputation as dangerously paranoid. Everyone knows that Israel has around a hundred nuclear warheads (80 according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute). And everyone knows that Israel is biblical, eager to fulfill prophecies, like Zechariah 14:12:

“And this is the scourge with which Yahweh will strike all the nations that fought against Jerusalem; their flesh will rot while they are still standing; their eyes will rot in their sockets; their tongue will rot in their mouth.”

Martin van Creveld, professor of military history at the University of Jerusalem, explained to the British newspaper The Guardian in 2003 that the recurring Palestinian Intifadas would find only one solution: the “transfer” of all Palestinians out of Palestine. On the risk of opposition from the international community to such a project, he added:

“We have several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions…We have the capacity to take the world with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under.”3

That’s the Samson option in a nutshell. Its essence is nuclear terrorism.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
dictatorship image

Réseau InternationalUnder the dictatorship of images

International Network - March 28, 2024

If a few professional voices – teachers and doctors in particular – speak out against the overexposure of children to screens, the general public does not seem to fully understand the scale and deleterious nature of the phenomenon.

   

Attention and behavioral disorders, lack of autonomy, anxiety, apathy, loss of dexterity and taste for manual work, the list of collateral damage grows as the permissiveness of the parents and the bankruptcy of the family grow. 'an educational system subject to globalist ideology, where digital technology occupies an ever more important place. A system where the child is no longer “taught” but “accompanied” – that is to say assisted for some and abandoned for others, depending on the good faith and skills of the teacher…

Everything is not to be thrown away in the new pedagogies in force which intend to make the student "the actor of his learning", but to minimize the role of transmission of the teacher, in favor of a presumed collaborative dynamic of children – which remains, in fact, very unequal and relative – we sacrifice knowledge for a few ideological illusions and the whims of irresponsible communicators.

Distance learning during the Covid period has shown this well: apart from a minority of particularly keen students, the results of the experiment were disastrous, both from the point of view of the acquisition of knowledge and that of personal development. Even today, teachers are trying to fill the gaps and manage the problems linked to abusive confinements, having to deal acrobatically with everyone's delay. It is certain that this episode will have marked a turning point in the student's relationship to his need to understand and learn, breaking in some way the link with his tutor in favor of the machine and the new education lobbies.

Like the parent, the teacher is, more than an authority figure, a model. A model certainly imperfect but endowed with character, and above all a bearer of knowledge and a sense of justice. Depersonalizing knowledge is perhaps not a tragedy – after all, from a certain age anyone can freely educate themselves thanks to the infinite resources offered by the Internet – but it seems to me that this dangerously contributes to the generalized dehumanization of our societies, where new communication tools have disrupted the interactive issues and the temporality of relationships, to the point of leading to all kinds of neuroses linked to the cult of immediacy and consumption.

In societies where we are assailed by images and representations, where information – often of the most futile nature – is systematically illustrated, manipulated, staged, following the sacred laws of advertising, being under construction is literally found lost between a virtual universe and the real world.

Digital capitalism has made the child a precocious consumer, delivered to the dictatorship of images and the predation of a perverse ultraliberalism. If we observe in classrooms more and more students presenting difficulties and all kinds of “dys-” disorders, it is also because the brain, overloaded with violent and senseless images, is desperately seeking a way out of the pathology of the world thus exposed, no longer available for healthy learning.

Observing on a daily basis the cognitive and behavioral impact of violence experienced in images on young people, we can resolutely consider ourselves lucky to be part of generations who have only experienced the private use and generalization of digital tools in recent years. 'adulthood. The dependence of young people on screens, encouraged by the trend and the need for integration, being a means of enslaving the most vulnerable by depriving them of their creative faculties, initiative and reflection.

We know that reading is fundamental in the development of the imagination, training in critical thinking and self-affirmation, as much as in mastering the language and acquiring the skills of expression. And when it is not possible or when it is not of particular interest to the child, its benefits can be partly offset by different construction and projection games, calling on the imagination and creativity. . But when there are neither books nor games, and the child finds himself under the influence of a screen which enslaves him, traumatizes him and systematically lowers him to the zero level of culture, when he is cut off from the world and nature, then it is not surprising that humanity returns to its unfortunate disposition towards war and totalitarianism.

According to the leitmotif of our dear president, here comes the “end of carelessness”. But the question that should be asked, urgently, is the following: if we are told of an end, what precisely should the carelessness give way to? To terror and the reign of perversity? Or to a superior knowledge, which would allow us to do without our leaders?

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Windows 11 a potential spy

Revolution 2030: Other sourceA researcher's scandalous find on Windows 11

Revolution 2030: Other source - March 24, 2024

Windows 11 spies on everything you do without asking your consent.

   

For those who use the keyboard a little, this video will be instructive. The goal is to stop the hemorrhage of data leaks to third-party and GAFAM sites.

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
the erasure of France

Equality and ReconciliationMacron or the erasure of France (extract SAPTR 26)

Equality and Reconciliation - March 16, 2024

Full episode available on VOD from Kontre Kulture: kontrekulture.com/produit/soral-a-presque-toujours-raison-episode-26-mars-2024/

   

Contents of this SAPTR #26

00:27 – Continuation of the “Fat Lesbian” affair
02:34 – Complaint from “French Jewish Youth”
07:08 – Macron or the erasure of France
15:47 – The destruction of a country by its language (1)
18:48 – The destruction of a country by its language (2)
20:24 – Rachida Dati or the negation of French culture
24:08 – Attal or the alliance of the star and the washer
28:40 – Attal vs Bardella: youthism versus youthism
37:14 – BHL and Yakovleff: the pathological denial of Russian victory in Ukraine
42:50 – Terroir and globalism: the peasant world fighting for its survival
54:00 – Highly symbolic: a family of farmers crushed by OQTF
56:44 – When Todd says (almost everything) like Soral
01h03:34 – Gaza or the great revealer
01h07:59 – The end of the Shoah annuity?
01h17:33 – The discredit of Zionist communication
01h25:38 – Youthism: identitarians are mental leftists
01h29:57 – When Julien Dray rediscovers himself Hebrew
01h33:12 – Neither forgiveness nor forgetting: the religion of hatred
01:37:26 – Ethnic cleansing has always been the Zionist project
01:46:29 – Israel's future can only be South Africa
01h51:26 – The return to the fundamentals of the left and the right
01h56:40 – The regained honor of Jean-Luc Mélenchon
02h04:51 – The useful inconsistency of LGBT
02h07:34 – The Zionist abjection of a certain Catholic right
02h12:26 – The consequences for the France of tomorrow?
02h16:29 – Solutions for the France of tomorrow?
02h18:31 – The Jewish community in the France of tomorrow?
02h23:12 – At the dawn of a third world war?
02h29:29 – On the unhappy conscience of the French far-right
02h35:02 – American elections: how to still steal from Trump in 2024?
02h41:49 – Make no mistake about the clash of civilizations

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Protection of children: Appeal to parents

The Media in 4-4-2Protection of children: Appeal to parents

The Media in 4-4-2 - March 03, 2024

CALL TO PARENTS: issues of child protection in the face of the emotional, relational and sexual life education program.

   

François DUBOIS calls for parents to be made aware of the growing hypersexualization of content intended for children, particularly in educational programs. It highlights the risks for childhood and pleads for respectful emotional and relational education. Highlighting the importance of parental vigilance and collective action to protect our children.

I am launching this appeal to all parents in order to raise their awareness of the issue of child protection.

We note with dismay a number of growing abuses linked to the hypersexualization of content intended for children and resulting from EAS programs (sexuality education, from primary school) of national education. The new Prime Minister, Gabriel Attal, with his sense of priorities, announced shortly after his appointment, on January 20, that a new education program for emotional, relational and sexual life will apply in establishments schools at the start of the 2024 school year.

Children are confronted with sexual “education” at an increasingly younger age, the content of which depends on the external provider who provides it (often a nurse). There is a lack of control over the message delivered, sometimes leading to the observation of certain abuses which fall under the yoke of the law.

Another problem is that it is difficult, if not impossible, for a parent to obtain the contents of the sequences. What's more, these programs are not systematically announced in advance and are often inserted between two courses, which makes them difficult to circumvent.

Let's stay in the school world (over which we, parents, have little control). France 3 relayed information relating to a CM1 class and a CM2 class from L'Union (Haute-Garonne) who participated in a show during which drawings of a sexual nature were projected. The situation is uncomfortable: children dance in front of their parents with in the background watered-down drawings of orgies or women having their breasts caressed... Have parents filed a complaint? I don't know, but I hope so.

I will therefore start by reminding the law by quoting article 227-22 of the Penal Code:

“The fact of encouraging or attempting to encourage the corruption of a minor is punishable by five years of imprisonment and a fine of 75 euros. These penalties are increased to seven years of imprisonment and a fine of 000 euros when […] the acts are committed in teaching or educational establishments or in administration premises. »

The article of the Penal Code unfortunately does not explicitly define the term corruption. Is this voluntary, knowing that it is much more precise in defining the terms constituting other offenses?

However, corruption means exposing the minor to sexuality and encouraging the minor to engage in sexual activity in any way whatsoever.

The notion of consent does not come into play here and the guilty intention depends, of course, exclusively on the adult involved. The criminalization of corruption of a minor aims to preserve the sense of modesty of minors by protecting them against certain acts tending to arouse their sexual impulses.

By a judgment of the Criminal Chamber of February 8, 2017 (16-80.102), the Court of Cassation specifies that the offense of corruption of a minor is only criminally punishable if the perpetrator had in mind the perversion of the young person. victim and not just the satisfaction of his own passions.

The L'Union affair (Haute-Garonne) is no exception to the rule. Isn't there perverse exposure to minors to sexuality? Isn't there an encouragement, an incentive for minors to be open to this type of practice, or at least to integrate them as a new norm? Can the adults responsible for this staging only claim to have at no time assumed the perverse and corrupting nature of the latter?

Some testimonies sometimes report blatant abuses. Thus we would have largely gone beyond the stage of preventive explanations (STDs, contraception etc.) or biological explanations (mechanisms of reproduction etc.) to display sexual practices, such as sodomy, homosexual relations, or fellatio children who are sometimes extremely young and who are not yet sufficiently constructed and normalized to transition in such a brutal way from their asexual world (ante puberty) to the reality and impudence of adult relationships.

Imposing an extremely detailed explanation of “leisure” sexuality without children being ready for it, and without them asking, is not only extremely violent, but can be extremely disturbing or even traumatic for them. .

Any adult should be aware of this. In this specific case, what is there other than perversion in wanting to corrupt young children by imposing such visions on them?

I am not speaking to alert parents who are already taking concrete action at their own level to protect their little ones.

My appeal is addressed above all to those who do not dare to take the step of protesting in public, either out of a feeling of powerlessness, or because they do not see the danger represented by the hypersexualization of relationships with others. childhood for our society.

Father of three children and recently confronted with this situation with my wife, we realized that we were alone in expressing doubts, asking questions and demanding the contents of this famous “education in sentimental and sexual life” which was to be given to our eleven year old daughter. Following this, the establishment transformed the name of the intervention on pronote into “education for sentimental life”…

After surveying other parents, we realized that despite this overall inertia, a majority of them agreed with us. Unable to obtain (despite our negotiations) any content or summary of the intervention, our daughter did not attend. Simple precautionary principle to protect it from possible illegal infringement. But what a shame that she was the only one absent while the majority of parents thought no less! The goal here was not a full boycott, but to demand more clarification and transparency. Note that according to my daughter, some of her classmates told her that they felt uncomfortable because, despite the name transformed by the establishment into "education for sentimental life" (probably to appease other parents ), we would have talked exclusively about sexual relations to the little ones.

Why this passivity of parents who fundamentally disagree? A majority of French people are disoriented. Tormented by geopolitical chaos plunging it into a moribund socio-economic context, this majority now lives in fear of tomorrow.

Absorbed by her daily difficulties, she no longer necessarily has the energy to fight. Evolving in a society losing its bearings, victim of a vast enterprise of deconstruction and ideological propaganda, she experiences more and more difficulty in discerning the causes for which it would nevertheless be just and necessary to fight.

Trained since 2020 to confine themselves, to be traced, to blindly obey the media-pharmaceutical diktat, this majority today constitutes an archetype of conformist society since it is pusillanimous. This sad observation is only flattering for Orwell, who, alas, was right.

It is this majority to whom I am addressing. It is this majority that needs to be encouraged and helped.

It is also this majority that has sometimes not yet understood to what extent the fight for child protection is essential to the defense of our interests. This fight is essential to avoid losing control of our future. A strong people is a people who can project themselves into the future and identify with the past. A strong people is a people who do not allow themselves to be enslaved and who remain sovereign: a strong people is the essential prerequisite for any democracy.

From the school promotion of transgender ideology[2], through the premature discovery of unbridled sexual practices, sex becomes omnipresent and omnipotent for our children. An inevitable social component of our progressive Western societies, it floods the internet, television, fashion, and now, schools. It must prevail from an early age and the current government has made the hypersexualization of children its hobby horse.

Let's bet that it will above all be a Trojan horse!

Deconstruction through the hypersexualization of society[3] is in this sense a formidable weapon to fragment us into niche ideological and individualist logics which will complicate sentimental relationships, generate family instability and, a major anthropological upheaval, lead to the disappearance of genealogy through the opening of the GPA and PMA markets.

Thus atomized, the society of the future will be unable to constitute a stable and protesting bloc defending common values ​​to oppose an organized elite seeking to despoil it, enslave it and exploit it. Totalitarianism always takes hold insidiously.

It is high time that the nauseating ideological propaganda that attacks our children finally stops. This can only happen through the actions of responsible parents who dare to challenge the system when they believe it exposes their children to danger. Strength must remain in the law as long as it still works for the protection of children; parents should not hesitate to take legal action as long as the violations are sufficiently serious. This is a fight for our children and their future.

ADJ (er) François DUBOIS

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Trump 911

VoltairenetDonald Trump reopens the September 11, 2001 attacks file

Voltairenet - 27 Jan 2024

During an electoral rally in Laconia (New Hampshire), the US presidential candidate, Donald Trump, recalled that there had never been a foreign attack on September 11, 2001, as he 'had said the same day on the New York One television channel.

   

He recalled that this bloody scene had caused not only 3 victims in the United States, but above all served as a pretext for the massacre of millions of innocent people in the broader Middle East.

Thierry Meyssan was the first in the world to explain, on Voltairenet.org, that the official narration of the events of September 11 had no connection with reality. Then he published a world bestseller, The Terrible Imposture, to analyze the consequences of this lie: first the installation of a system of mass surveillance in the United States and throughout the West (confirmed by Edward Snowden), then the extension of imperialism to the wider Middle East (confirmed by Julian Assange). In 2005, Thierry Meyssan organized a conference in Brussels with 150 personalities from around the world to develop a response to the Straussians and other neo-conservatives. One of Donald Trump's lawyers (who had not yet entered politics) participated.

Since then, two official interventions have contradicted Bush's version of events:
The FBI has determined that US Attorney General Theodore Olson's testimony that he spoke with his wife aboard Flight AA 77 before it crashed into the Pentagon was false.
An officer with the Office of Military Commissions, Daniel Canestraro, testified that two of the alleged hijackers were CIA agents.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Israel and the Holocaust hoax

Réseau InternationalAmerican Pravda: Israel and the Holocaust Hoax

International Network - Jan 12, 2024

Last month I explored the historical origins of the State of Israel and the expulsion of Palestinian refugees from their ancient homeland. During this discussion, I highlighted the crucial role played by the Jewish Holocaust in justifying and facilitating these momentous events that occurred three generations ago.

   

I've read or reread over a dozen books for my long review article, and I also mentioned another one in passing, which I have now also digested. I had focused primarily on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and Tom Segev’s “The Seventh Million” only scratched the surface of that subject. But its descriptive subtitle “Israelis and the Holocaust” suggested a related topic of inquiry that proved very fruitful.

Born in 1945, Tom Segev is generally considered one of Israel's greatest journalists, author of many popular stories about Israel's origins and its various wars. Although his 1991 bestseller was controversial, the back cover contained praise from prominent Israeli figures such as Abba Eban and Amos Elon, as well as leading Holocaust scholars such as Professor George L .Mosse and leaders of the Jewish diaspora such as Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel. I found this book very informative, although perhaps not quite in the way the author intended.

Even aside from its main theme, the first chapter provides extremely useful information. In 2018, I had already drawn inspiration from the shocking research found in the books of left-wing maverick Lenni Brenner to publish a long article on the surprising relationship between the various Zionist factions and Nazi Germany, which spent most of 1930s to work together in a close economic partnership that laid the foundation for the creation of the State of Israel.2

Although Brenner's documentary research seemed rock solid and had never been seriously questioned, I had always had some slight doubts in the back of my mind. I had wondered whether such astonishing facts could really be true and remain completely concealed for generations by almost all of our journalists and academics, but Segev's brief discussion completely put an end to those doubts. Segev is a very classic pro-Zionist Israeli writer and he probably despised Brenner, a radical anti-Zionist Trotskyist, never mentioning the latter's name in the approximately 600 pages of his text. But Segev drew on the same underlying archival sources to fully confirm all of Brenner's most inflammatory historical claims and even added a few, although all of this similar material was obviously presented in a very different way .

In the 1920s, the left-wing Zionist movement was heavily influenced by Marxism and led by Russian-born David Ben-Gurion, who was inspired by Lenin, but these Zionists still enthusiastically formed an economic partnership with the Nazi Germany in the 1930s, based on an obvious community of interests. Hitler was eager to encourage the departure of Germany's problematic 1% Jewish minority, while the Zionists were just as eager to welcome them and the enormous infusion of financial and industrial capital they could provide. During this period, important SS leaders, notably Adolf Eichmann, were invited to Palestine as honored Zionist guests and subsequently published their flattering accounts of the successful development activities of their Zionist partners in the main Berlin Nazi newspaper of Joseph Goebbels. Some Zionist leaders reciprocated by going to Germany for very friendly meetings with their Nazi counterparts, and they reported how well the Jews there seemed to be doing despite Hitler's supposedly harsh new regime.

Indeed, Segev's figures demonstrate the enormous prosperity of German Jews, which explains why Zionists were so eager to organize their resettlement in impoverished Palestine. The Nazis agreed that each Jewish emigrant would take with them the current equivalent of $200 in foreign currency, plus $000 or more in German goods. These were considerable sums for the desperately poor society of Weimar Germany, and this Jewish wealth was clearly one of the main sources of anti-Semitic resentment in that country.

If the main Zionist groups cooperated with Nazi Germany for purely utilitarian reasons, their right-wing Zionist rivals had more ideological motivations since they had modeled their movement on that of Mussolini and always considered themselves fascists, like their bitter adversaries. Many of these Zionists even viewed Hitler's notorious anti-Semitism as a mere political stain rather than an intolerable obstacle to their admiration. In 1933, a leading Zionist writer ranked the German dictator among the world's "brilliant names", alongside Mussolini, Atatürk and his movement's various other right-wing heroes, while another Zionist figure loudly declared and strong that “Hitler saved Germany”. Even after the start of World War II, one of these Zionist factions, led by a future Prime Minister of Israel, repeatedly sought to enlist in the Axis powers, hoping to joining the military alliance led by Hitler and Mussolini.

One of the interesting points Segev makes is that although a large majority of ordinary Jews around the world were intensely hostile to Hitler's regime, the leaders of most of the various Zionist factions quietly became fierce competitors for German patronage, with those who lost sometimes hypocritically denouncing the Nazi affiliations of their more successful rivals. These bitter remarks led to the assassination in 1933 of one of the main Zionist leaders in Palestine by his right-wing detractors.

Although this Nazi-Zionist partnership was controversial at the time, it became even more so after the defeat of the Axis and the concerted effort by the Allies to demonize the Nazis through the Nuremberg trials and other propaganda spectacles, so the new State of Israel has tried hard to conceal this dark secret from its recent past. When these historical facts from the 1930s threatened to leak out in the mid-1950s due to the legal troubles of a prominent Israeli political figure, the man was assassinated, and Segev suggested that the Israeli government had probably organized the murder in order to permanently shut his mouth.

After this rather surprising first chapter, the bulk of Segev's narrative shifts to a very different subject, namely Israel's tangled relationship with the Holocaust, the deliberate extermination of some six million defenseless Jewish civilians by the Nazi Germany, mainly in the gas chambers of various World War II concentration camps. On these basic facts, the author's view seems entirely conventional, and on several occasions he emphasizes the bestial cruelty of the Nazis' evil plan to eliminate all the world's Jews. But although references to the Holocaust, gas chambers or the most famous concentration camps such as Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor and Dachau are sprinkled across much of all these pages, Segev largely avoids discussing the details of this industrial massacre, apparently assuming that all of his readers are thoroughly familiar with the standard narrative produced by modern Holocaust research, which began in the wake of Raul Hilberg's seminal work in 1961. Ironically, Segev notes that 'At the time of its writing, Hilberg's classic work remained untranslated into Hebrew, probably because it indicated that all those millions of Jews had willingly gone to their deaths, guided by the leaders of their own community and without ever showing signs of active resistance.

However, Israeli society is unusual in that a significant fraction of its founding population consisted of postwar Holocaust survivors, "the seventh million" of Segev's title, individuals who were themselves passed through the various Nazi death camps. Consequently, their vivid personal accounts appear to have allowed the Israeli public, including Segev himself, born just weeks before Hitler's suicide and the collapse of his German regime, to largely understand these momentous events.

Perhaps because Segev's first chapter documents the close collaboration between the Nazis and Zionists in the 1930s, which might disconcert his readers, he prefaces this discussion with a prologue that recounts the horrors of the Holocaust which followed shortly thereafter in chronological order. He focused on the books of an Auschwitz survivor named Yehiel De-Nur, who had spent two years in that infamous death camp, and although this writer's name does not mean much to United States today, he became a famous post-war author in Israel.

Although all of De-Nur's autobiographical volumes were published under a pseudonym and his true identity remained hidden for many years, his works are among the earliest literature on the Holocaust in Israel and have had considerable influence in drawing the attention of the Israeli public to the horrific details of this catastrophe, with a special literary prize established in his honor, awarded every two years by the Israeli president.

Indeed, Segev explained that he and most Israeli teenagers of his generation learned the extremely disturbing details of the Holocaust from De-Nur's books, so that when he managed to arrange a personal interview with the The author did so with great trepidation. De-Nur's writings have always focused on the sadistic acts that were part of daily life at Auschwitz, including the widespread sexual abuse of young Jewish boys and girls by their Nazi captors, and Segev describes the works as considerably pornographic.

According to Segev, De-Nur was a young Yeshiva student in pre-war Poland, with great literary pretensions, who was desperately trying to get his writings published when the war came and he found himself in Auschwitz . De-Nur later claimed that Eichmann had personally condemned him to this fate. So he was one of the key witnesses at Eichmann's trial in 1961, and his testimony ended with him fainting, meant to reflect the unspeakable personal memories that still haunted him, even decades later.

I also happened to recently read Hannah Arendt's 1963 classic, "Eichmann in Jerusalem," and De-Nur was one of the few witnesses she also focused on, treating his testimony very less kindness than Segev. According to his account, De-Nur's bizarre and rambling monologue included topics such as astrology and all sorts of other strange things, which greatly embarrassed the serious legal proceedings. When the prosecutor finally interrupted him to ask some basic factual questions, De-Nur immediately collapsed into a fit of hysteria, allowing the judge to save the day by ordering that the witness be permanently removed. of the bar. Arendt suggested that De-Nur's testimony demonstrated the enormous difficulty emotional eyewitnesses sometimes have in distinguishing between their actual memories of events that occurred many years before and the products of their own vivid imaginations.

Indeed, Segev appears to confirm Arendt's observation by explaining that De-Nur was so emotionally broken by his experiences at Auschwitz that he required many years of psychiatric follow-up and also began a series of treatment sessions on LSD, during which he recalled visions of his days in the camp. He eventually produced a new manuscript on the Holocaust, which included presumably imaginary scenes of brutal events such as an SS guard murdering the Jewish boy who had been a victim of his sexual perversions, then grilling the boy's body on a spit and devouring the flesh piece by piece.

These bizarre prologue pages apparently represent a large part of the Holocaust narrative as understood by most Israelis and I found it rather disconcerting that they were immediately followed by the chapter describing the mundane details of the Nazi partnership -Zionist a few years ago, an extremely strange juxtaposition of such radically different situations. Thus, according to Segev's apparent reconstruction, the friendly and respectful trade agreements between German Nazis and Zionist Jews of the late 1930s were suddenly replaced in the early 1940s by a diabolical, sadomasochistic effort by the Nazis to exterminate totally every Jew in the world, an extremely strange transformation that raised serious questions in my mind.

[...]

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
macron emperor EU

Revolution 2030: Other sourcePhilippe de Villiers' troubling comments on Macron's future

Revolution 2030: Other source - January 11, 2024

Philippe de Villiers claims to know where our dear president is coming from, and that doesn't make one dream...

   

The people will have been warned. For a long time, certain wise individuals have been pointing the finger at the total power in the making of the unelected President of the European Commission. With Macron emperor of Western Europe in disarray, Elon Musk in support with his alternative media and his transhumanist Neurolink, Bill Gates at the head of the WHO and the management of pandemics, Soros at the migratory flows, etc., etc. . don't you see the 2030 Agenda coming in all its splendor 6.6.6?

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
real Elon Musk

CloudyElon Musk, reality

Hazy Sky - Jan 11, 2024

Elon Musk, a wolf in sheep's clothing

   

Let's think: how can you officially be the richest man in the world and oppose the sect, without whose support his empire would collapse in one day?

And why do governments, which supposedly hate Musk’s “free speech,” continue to give him the taxpayer subsidies his empire depends on?

How is it that the sect, through its Deep State, which controlled Twitter and what could be published, suddenly sold it to Musk, an absolutist of free speech?

Now he is the god of alternative media that the sect must control...