Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
pandemic treaty - WHO

The DefenderWHO: Misleading letter calls for support for pandemic treaty

The Defender - April 01, 2024

Misleading letter calls for support for pandemic treaty as Louisiana becomes first US state to reject WHO takeover.

   

More than 100 former world leaders and public figures are urging World Health Organization (WHO) member states to finalize a new “pandemic deal” in time for the 77th World Health Assembly, to be held in Geneva , in Switzerland, from May 27 to June 1.

In an open letter dated March 20, the leaders wrote:

“An agreement on the pandemic is essential to preserve our collective future. Only a strong global pact on pandemics can protect future generations from a repeat of the Covid-19 crisis, which claimed millions of lives and caused widespread social and economic devastation.”

Critics of the draft pandemic agreement told the Defender that the letter is misleading because it discusses the draft agreement, or “pandemic treaty”, but does not refer to amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (RSI).

Changes to the IHR, proposed in 2023, are being negotiated at the same time as the agreement. Critics of the letter said it was intended to distract from what they see as the more onerous proposals contained in the IHR amendments.

Dr David Bell, a public health physician, biotechnology consultant and former director of global health technology at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund, told the Defender the letter was “utterly shameful” and “misleading”.

Mr Bell said:

“The letter follows the lead of the Director-General in misleading the public by asserting, correctly, that the pandemic agreement does not include provisions that transfer authority from countries to the WHO, even though these provisions do in the proposed amendments to the IHR which accompany the agreement on the pandemic.

“The proposed amendments to the IHR specifically mention border closures, compulsory vaccination and other measures today associated with confinement. They specifically mention that documents are needed to cross borders and cite digital passports as one of the possible solutions.

Dutch lawyer Meike Terhorst told the Defender that the open letter “only refers to the pandemic agreement to sow confusion”.

“The real issue lies in the amendments to the IHR, because on the basis of these amendments the WHO Director-General should obtain independent legislative and executive powers, while any legal control is made impossible,” said Ms Terhorst . “The secrecy surrounding the plans suggests that it is a coup.

Are the negotiations in difficulty?

Some critics have suggested the open letter could be a sign that negotiations for the pandemic deal are failing.

“Neither document has consensus among member states,” said Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, executive director of Children's Health Defense (CHD) Africa and founder of Transformative Health Justice. “With eight weeks until the World Health Assembly, the WHO is clearly concerned that the agreement could be derailed.

The BMJ reports that “little progress” has been made on the draft pandemic deal, and that the intellectual property waiver “remains a sticking point for member nations who are at loggerheads in the discussions” .

“Supporters of the agreement fear that the final draft will be watered down during negotiations and that weaker wording will result in recommending that countries take certain actions rather than compelling them to do so under international law,” according to The BMJ.

Others noted growing global opposition to the proposed agreement and changes to the IHR. Iran, New Zealand, Slovakia and the Netherlands recently rejected proposed 2022 IHR amendments, while in South Africa a “WHO withdrawal bill” was proposed .

In the United States, the Louisiana Senate voted unanimously on March 26 against allowing the WHO, the United Nations and the World Economic Forum to have any influence over the state of Louisiana. Louisiana.

“The fact that all Democrats voted in favor shows how popular this sentiment is with their voters,” said the president of the European Commission. Dr. Meryl Nass, internist and founder of Door to Freedom, “I think this sends a message to politicians around the world that favoring the WHO will come with a significant political cost.”

Pandemic agreement does not threaten sovereignty, but IHR amendments do

Independent journalist James Roguski told The Defender that the letter from world leaders to the WHO is “largely correct” because the proposed pandemic deal is not an “attack on national sovereignty.”

However, Mr. Roguski and Dr. Kat Lindley, president of the Global Health Project and director of the Global COVID Summit, emphasized that the IHR amendments pose a threat to the sovereignty of nations.

According to Ms Lindley, the amendments to the IHR will make WHO “the global authority on health in the event of further pandemics, which they clearly believe will occur again and again” and could pave the way for “ future vaccination mandates and the imposition of digital health passes.”

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
yellow union

Ariane Bilheran OfficialThe controlled opposition or "the yellow union"

Ariane Bilheran Official - January 25, 2024

The establishment of the Covid dystopia has led to profound ruptures within our societies.

   

Groups were formed to resist the reign of the absurd and the health dictatorship, new media emerged, and also, of course, opinion leaders and charismatic figures. Will we believe that the power which put in place such an iniquitous and abusive system has remained idle in the face of this protest? The recent turmoil in the sphere of opposition testifies, on the contrary, to an effective work of undermining and subversion, which must be studied in itself as one of the components of the current totalitarian drift. Here is an overview of the strategies and processes.

When a power launches a war against its population, to push through unpopular measures and/or various tyrannical projects, it knows that a politicized fringe (in the sense of political commitment in the noble sense), certainly minimal but solid , risks reacting. He therefore anticipates and channels this anger by manufacturing “his” resistance, a product of the same engineering and the same ardor with which he works to manipulate the population. Note that the same methods are applied in companies, during the creation of the “yellow union” whose function will be to serve, not the workers, but the bosses.

So, how does a power anticipate resistance and control it from within until neutralizing and then dissolving it? It is customary to speak of controlled opposition (which I will call here “yellow union”) but we still need to come back to the techniques used.

This facade opposition is created “from the start”. This point is essential. It has several functions. First of all, direct and concentrate discontent as much as possible in a single place, held by the same power behind the leader(s) of the yellow union. This agglomeration will then make it possible to direct this anger towards demands which are not dangerous for those in power and to engage in non-dangerous actions, which divert attention from those which are. For example, the yellow union will fight for the break time or the meal menu in the canteen, rather than against the layoff plan. Angry subjects are hidden and attention is diverted. Finally, it is a question of mapping the opponents, in order to obtain all the names, and identify the most problematic among them, both in strength and dangerousness as in power of character and integrity, with the intention of neutralize in the long term.

Profiling

Who are the actors of this “authorized resistance” in the service of power? On the front line are the conscious actors, the spies and the leaders of the yellow union. The latter are agents recruited, chosen, previously trained, scrupulously trained, formidablely advised, and obviously, handsomely remunerated. Let's start with the visible leaders, who are devilishly intelligent, cultured, and therefore have all the talents to fulfill this mission.

Their profile must appear impeccable: ability to devote themselves to the cause of resistance, image intended to attract strong sympathy, even idolatry which will allow the creation of a new sect, with the aim of ousting, with the help of bewitched fanatics , the other honest leaders once the slogan is given, or to create an illusion such that, when the actions of the leaders of the yellow union begin to be revealed, no one can believe them.

The two strategies

A communication strategy will be put in place so that the population can easily identify which leaders should be followed. For example, they can be propelled into certain power media as resistance leaders, with two techniques. The first will be the highly publicized passage in a communications organ of power, nevertheless presented to the masses as an opposition media, which will not stand up to the analysis of financial support: who pays for the orchestra pays for the music.

The second consists of publicizing infiltrated leaders as leaders who cannot be approached, for example, with incriminating articles, visibility on television, etc. and even, to make people believe in reprisals against them (censorship, summons, etc.). The film with its actors, its scenario and its adventures must be, above all, perfectly credible. The main thing is that the whole thing is widely publicized and that the agents can be easily and quickly identified as the new leaders of the resistance. By covering these two aspects, we are quite certain to attract the majority of the discontented: those who believe what the official media tell them, and those who no longer believe them but still believe in the official media or the media now inducted into this resistance manipulated. This observation of the mode of propulsion of the leaders of the yellow union is also valid for the media and groups (associations, etc.) which will fulfill the role of pseudo-opponents to power, and be invested with this mission.

During this time, and in reality, the real opponents (leaders, spokespersons, groups and media) are the object of a clever strategy of invisibility and censorship, whether in the official media of power or in the apparent media of the opposition to power. With one nuance: if we need to use their image as a guarantee of integrity or credibility, they can be used for a certain period of time. We will erase them from the chessboard later, when this “authority argument” is no longer of interest.

Blackmail

Apart from these agents duly employed by those in power to create a spider's web around the resistance in order to easily devour individuals and groups who disturb (on the condition of having previously isolated and trapped them), there are other profiles in the service of “authorized resistance”. These are profiles on which the authorities have files to put them at their service and blackmail them: if they do not submit, their fate will be much worse. This was particularly the usefulness of Epstein's black notebooks. This is the function of all the compromises to which people are forced in political politics. For example, in the fight against pedophile networks, many pedophiles are in reality at the service of power and pretend to fight against this scourge. They thus collect money (which will therefore not be distributed to real resistance/militant groups, a tactic of diversion of flows), but worse, they attract many victims, who then land in the trap, and end up captured. in these networks. This is how certain well-established (publicized) associations charge up to 150 euros in legal fees in cases where a parent reports sexual transgressions against their child. The result is known in advance: the parent is cheated, the child ends up in the hands of his attacker, or worse, in certain sectors of “child protection”, itself today infiltrated by the networks pedophiles. I have seen around a hundred similar files over the last decade.

Harassment

Finally, there are small hands in the shadows, intended to harass the real resistant profiles, and to weaken them, particularly in the information war: the teams of trolls who flock to a subject to pollute it, with a specific training, training and targeted instructions.

Infiltration

To neutralize profiles that disturb those in power, it is necessary to identify their supporters and do everything possible to weaken them. The first technique consists of sending a spy to offer help, to try to get as close as possible to the real leader, to obtain as much information as possible about him and the mapping of his allies. It is the same for the groups that will have to be infiltrated. Another method: a first agent attacks the individual, while another agent, officially an “enemy” of the first, approaches the target to provide support and gain their trust…

This infiltration is the work of spies responsible for observing, taking strategic positions, and ruling out resistance rallies which are significant, honest supporters. They are also used to manipulate vulnerabilities, recover private information about people: network of friends, financial capacities, location of residence, living conditions, etc., in order to then bend them using techniques that I have already amply developed in my work on harassment years ago.

[...]

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Israel and the Holocaust hoax

Réseau InternationalAmerican Pravda: Israel and the Holocaust Hoax

International Network - Jan 12, 2024

Last month I explored the historical origins of the State of Israel and the expulsion of Palestinian refugees from their ancient homeland. During this discussion, I highlighted the crucial role played by the Jewish Holocaust in justifying and facilitating these momentous events that occurred three generations ago.

   

I've read or reread over a dozen books for my long review article, and I also mentioned another one in passing, which I have now also digested. I had focused primarily on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and Tom Segev’s “The Seventh Million” only scratched the surface of that subject. But its descriptive subtitle “Israelis and the Holocaust” suggested a related topic of inquiry that proved very fruitful.

Born in 1945, Tom Segev is generally considered one of Israel's greatest journalists, author of many popular stories about Israel's origins and its various wars. Although his 1991 bestseller was controversial, the back cover contained praise from prominent Israeli figures such as Abba Eban and Amos Elon, as well as leading Holocaust scholars such as Professor George L .Mosse and leaders of the Jewish diaspora such as Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel. I found this book very informative, although perhaps not quite in the way the author intended.

Even aside from its main theme, the first chapter provides extremely useful information. In 2018, I had already drawn inspiration from the shocking research found in the books of left-wing maverick Lenni Brenner to publish a long article on the surprising relationship between the various Zionist factions and Nazi Germany, which spent most of 1930s to work together in a close economic partnership that laid the foundation for the creation of the State of Israel.2

Although Brenner's documentary research seemed rock solid and had never been seriously questioned, I had always had some slight doubts in the back of my mind. I had wondered whether such astonishing facts could really be true and remain completely concealed for generations by almost all of our journalists and academics, but Segev's brief discussion completely put an end to those doubts. Segev is a very classic pro-Zionist Israeli writer and he probably despised Brenner, a radical anti-Zionist Trotskyist, never mentioning the latter's name in the approximately 600 pages of his text. But Segev drew on the same underlying archival sources to fully confirm all of Brenner's most inflammatory historical claims and even added a few, although all of this similar material was obviously presented in a very different way .

In the 1920s, the left-wing Zionist movement was heavily influenced by Marxism and led by Russian-born David Ben-Gurion, who was inspired by Lenin, but these Zionists still enthusiastically formed an economic partnership with the Nazi Germany in the 1930s, based on an obvious community of interests. Hitler was eager to encourage the departure of Germany's problematic 1% Jewish minority, while the Zionists were just as eager to welcome them and the enormous infusion of financial and industrial capital they could provide. During this period, important SS leaders, notably Adolf Eichmann, were invited to Palestine as honored Zionist guests and subsequently published their flattering accounts of the successful development activities of their Zionist partners in the main Berlin Nazi newspaper of Joseph Goebbels. Some Zionist leaders reciprocated by going to Germany for very friendly meetings with their Nazi counterparts, and they reported how well the Jews there seemed to be doing despite Hitler's supposedly harsh new regime.

Indeed, Segev's figures demonstrate the enormous prosperity of German Jews, which explains why Zionists were so eager to organize their resettlement in impoverished Palestine. The Nazis agreed that each Jewish emigrant would take with them the current equivalent of $200 in foreign currency, plus $000 or more in German goods. These were considerable sums for the desperately poor society of Weimar Germany, and this Jewish wealth was clearly one of the main sources of anti-Semitic resentment in that country.

If the main Zionist groups cooperated with Nazi Germany for purely utilitarian reasons, their right-wing Zionist rivals had more ideological motivations since they had modeled their movement on that of Mussolini and always considered themselves fascists, like their bitter adversaries. Many of these Zionists even viewed Hitler's notorious anti-Semitism as a mere political stain rather than an intolerable obstacle to their admiration. In 1933, a leading Zionist writer ranked the German dictator among the world's "brilliant names", alongside Mussolini, Atatürk and his movement's various other right-wing heroes, while another Zionist figure loudly declared and strong that “Hitler saved Germany”. Even after the start of World War II, one of these Zionist factions, led by a future Prime Minister of Israel, repeatedly sought to enlist in the Axis powers, hoping to joining the military alliance led by Hitler and Mussolini.

One of the interesting points Segev makes is that although a large majority of ordinary Jews around the world were intensely hostile to Hitler's regime, the leaders of most of the various Zionist factions quietly became fierce competitors for German patronage, with those who lost sometimes hypocritically denouncing the Nazi affiliations of their more successful rivals. These bitter remarks led to the assassination in 1933 of one of the main Zionist leaders in Palestine by his right-wing detractors.

Although this Nazi-Zionist partnership was controversial at the time, it became even more so after the defeat of the Axis and the concerted effort by the Allies to demonize the Nazis through the Nuremberg trials and other propaganda spectacles, so the new State of Israel has tried hard to conceal this dark secret from its recent past. When these historical facts from the 1930s threatened to leak out in the mid-1950s due to the legal troubles of a prominent Israeli political figure, the man was assassinated, and Segev suggested that the Israeli government had probably organized the murder in order to permanently shut his mouth.

After this rather surprising first chapter, the bulk of Segev's narrative shifts to a very different subject, namely Israel's tangled relationship with the Holocaust, the deliberate extermination of some six million defenseless Jewish civilians by the Nazi Germany, mainly in the gas chambers of various World War II concentration camps. On these basic facts, the author's view seems entirely conventional, and on several occasions he emphasizes the bestial cruelty of the Nazis' evil plan to eliminate all the world's Jews. But although references to the Holocaust, gas chambers or the most famous concentration camps such as Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor and Dachau are sprinkled across much of all these pages, Segev largely avoids discussing the details of this industrial massacre, apparently assuming that all of his readers are thoroughly familiar with the standard narrative produced by modern Holocaust research, which began in the wake of Raul Hilberg's seminal work in 1961. Ironically, Segev notes that 'At the time of its writing, Hilberg's classic work remained untranslated into Hebrew, probably because it indicated that all those millions of Jews had willingly gone to their deaths, guided by the leaders of their own community and without ever showing signs of active resistance.

However, Israeli society is unusual in that a significant fraction of its founding population consisted of postwar Holocaust survivors, "the seventh million" of Segev's title, individuals who were themselves passed through the various Nazi death camps. Consequently, their vivid personal accounts appear to have allowed the Israeli public, including Segev himself, born just weeks before Hitler's suicide and the collapse of his German regime, to largely understand these momentous events.

Perhaps because Segev's first chapter documents the close collaboration between the Nazis and Zionists in the 1930s, which might disconcert his readers, he prefaces this discussion with a prologue that recounts the horrors of the Holocaust which followed shortly thereafter in chronological order. He focused on the books of an Auschwitz survivor named Yehiel De-Nur, who had spent two years in that infamous death camp, and although this writer's name does not mean much to United States today, he became a famous post-war author in Israel.

Although all of De-Nur's autobiographical volumes were published under a pseudonym and his true identity remained hidden for many years, his works are among the earliest literature on the Holocaust in Israel and have had considerable influence in drawing the attention of the Israeli public to the horrific details of this catastrophe, with a special literary prize established in his honor, awarded every two years by the Israeli president.

Indeed, Segev explained that he and most Israeli teenagers of his generation learned the extremely disturbing details of the Holocaust from De-Nur's books, so that when he managed to arrange a personal interview with the The author did so with great trepidation. De-Nur's writings have always focused on the sadistic acts that were part of daily life at Auschwitz, including the widespread sexual abuse of young Jewish boys and girls by their Nazi captors, and Segev describes the works as considerably pornographic.

According to Segev, De-Nur was a young Yeshiva student in pre-war Poland, with great literary pretensions, who was desperately trying to get his writings published when the war came and he found himself in Auschwitz . De-Nur later claimed that Eichmann had personally condemned him to this fate. So he was one of the key witnesses at Eichmann's trial in 1961, and his testimony ended with him fainting, meant to reflect the unspeakable personal memories that still haunted him, even decades later.

I also happened to recently read Hannah Arendt's 1963 classic, "Eichmann in Jerusalem," and De-Nur was one of the few witnesses she also focused on, treating his testimony very less kindness than Segev. According to his account, De-Nur's bizarre and rambling monologue included topics such as astrology and all sorts of other strange things, which greatly embarrassed the serious legal proceedings. When the prosecutor finally interrupted him to ask some basic factual questions, De-Nur immediately collapsed into a fit of hysteria, allowing the judge to save the day by ordering that the witness be permanently removed. of the bar. Arendt suggested that De-Nur's testimony demonstrated the enormous difficulty emotional eyewitnesses sometimes have in distinguishing between their actual memories of events that occurred many years before and the products of their own vivid imaginations.

Indeed, Segev appears to confirm Arendt's observation by explaining that De-Nur was so emotionally broken by his experiences at Auschwitz that he required many years of psychiatric follow-up and also began a series of treatment sessions on LSD, during which he recalled visions of his days in the camp. He eventually produced a new manuscript on the Holocaust, which included presumably imaginary scenes of brutal events such as an SS guard murdering the Jewish boy who had been a victim of his sexual perversions, then grilling the boy's body on a spit and devouring the flesh piece by piece.

These bizarre prologue pages apparently represent a large part of the Holocaust narrative as understood by most Israelis and I found it rather disconcerting that they were immediately followed by the chapter describing the mundane details of the Nazi partnership -Zionist a few years ago, an extremely strange juxtaposition of such radically different situations. Thus, according to Segev's apparent reconstruction, the friendly and respectful trade agreements between German Nazis and Zionist Jews of the late 1930s were suddenly replaced in the early 1940s by a diabolical, sadomasochistic effort by the Nazis to exterminate totally every Jew in the world, an extremely strange transformation that raised serious questions in my mind.

[...]

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
One Attal for two Macrons

Equality and ReconciliationAppointment of Gabriel Attal: Juan Branco's manifesto

Equality and Reconciliation - 12 Jan 2024

Whatever one thinks of Juan Branco – who possesses a certain courage having earned him several times in the eye of the storm of the system – his testimony deserves to be read because he worked alongside our new Prime Minister for a long time and Much has already been written about him.

   

Five years ago, as part of a long investigation, I drew the portrait of a politician with baby teeth in whom no one was yet interested.

A certain Gabriel Attal.

It was 2018, and this book, entitled Crépuscule, demonstrated how the rise of Emmanuel Macron, far from the spontaneous democratic phenomenon, had taken root on an oligarchic fabrication that Attal would soon propel.

I described, in mirror image, their two journeys. We were in 2018, and this work, which offered an unprecedented insight into the way power was constructed in France, would immediately cause a scandal, seeing itself violently attacked by a press under orders that I knew intimately, and whose owners, panicked by secrets that I revealed, after having adored me, would spread throughout Paris claiming that it was all lies, resentment and deception.

Five years later, everything is there. Gabriel Attal, who was a nobody, a 28-year-old MP boosted by his lover, has just been appointed Prime Minister. And the confirmation of what was announced will have to question those who, throughout this period, will have blandly believed what they were told about this text, or will have remained silent for fear of being ostracized.

The publication of the work, with open access, was a real social phenomenon. Without any media coverage, a million people downloaded it. 500.000 listened to the audio version, then, once published in bookstores, 170.000 bought it.

This immense base, which saw itself told how democracy in France was only an illusion, quickly aroused concern and a frantic reaction from those in power, but especially from its relays, panicked at the idea that the truth had been made, not only on its beings, but on the way in which they were propelled. Let us remember that Aurore Bergé went as far as the Public Prosecutor, accusing me of having “armed the minds”. Do not laugh. The rest, we know it.

When the book was published - it was the fall of 2018 - the yellow vests had not yet set out, and Paris was cooing with love for this power that the rest of France abhorred. The omerta was such that the work would find no publisher for many months, circulating from hand to hand, in the pocket. However, weak signals were emerging. Gérard Collomb, overwhelmed by the Benalla affair, refused to do what was asked of him, and discreetly resigned from a power that he had created. For nearly two weeks, no one would succeed him, revealing a regime crisis which would be skillfully masked by the searches of France Insoumise and the inappropriate reaction of Jean-Luc Mélenchon. Like a child, caught red-handed, not believing what he saw, he would allow himself to be fooled by a spectacular intimidation operation whose sole purpose was to divert attention from what, in government, was happening. installed. Too frank, too innocent, he was that day, macronie, the perfect instrument.

The political crisis was averted, but the people were growling. Because France was collapsing. Early drug shortages accompanied a collapse in schooling, health and safety. This power, without legitimacy or origin, had no other choice but to plunder, and multiplied tax measures to, on the one hand, reward those who had done it, and on the other, make the remnants of the French.

No one recognized themselves in these beings who were supposed to represent them, patent liars who, claiming to finance the ecological transition, created a fuel tax to finance the CICE, a tax exemption for the wealthiest. Gabriel, who was then only a first-time MP boosted by his lover, therefore, Stéphane Séjourné, political advisor to the President, had obtained his constituency for small bribes, and was trying to make his way through this magma. He met his partner after being propelled at the age of 22 to the office of the Minister of Health Marisol Touraine by the graces of his daughter, alongside his future spouse Olivier Véran and Benjamin Griveaux. 6000 euros per month, driver and secretarial services for a young man who had not yet graduated - privileges which will now be guaranteed to him for life - that is something to seduce and excite.

With no professional background or qualifications to offer, we heard him laboriously defend two reforms, Parcoursup and the SNU in the National Assembly, alternating between the insignificant and the catastrophic. He stuttered slightly, and as always when he feared that his imposture would be revealed, or that his lies would be detected, let a crooked smile dominate him.

Gabriel was already going out of his way to get into the government, and these articles, in Macron, constituted powerful arguments. The rumor rustled among his fellow deputies. Powerful forces accompanied him. Barely elected, his first steps were immortalized in Paris Match. Nothing was said about who he was. A photograph reclining, cup of wine in hand, put him forward advantageously, talking about Fort Boyard and Orelsan, in the sun, in a lascivious pose, shirt open to the BHL, on the quays of Paris in front of the Seine and the Grand Palace. Paris Match, at 28? There are hundreds of thousands of readers every week. Every week, Gabriel, this summer, would be shown there.

How did he do it? Paris was rustling and beginning to wonder. Gabriel was rushing. It was that after having laid siege to his Versailles lover, Séjourné had arranged a meeting for him with Brigitte who in the government, with Blanquer had promoted him, and with Mimi Marchand and a few other pimps and traffickers, introduced him . It was they who, through maneuvering, had fabricated these articles that Paris Match and Bruno Jeudy were content to publish.

The months passed, and Gabriel Attal, as in all his positions, only made his unbridled ambition come true. The SNU, which he was in charge of, was collapsing, but the small cabinet he had been able to put together organized lunches and dinners for him with all of Paris. In a frenzy.

Gabriel had understood that for beings without quality, the solution was to run, and to run fast, jumping from morocco to morocco as he would go from spouse to spouse, imitating Emmanuel Macron, that is to say seeking his promotions before the slightest result can be attributed to it. Before the slightest failure could be attributed to him.

The posts passed, and the oligarchs came closer. Bernard Arnault gave his instructions to the Parisian, while Brigitte Macron called Marc-Olivier Fogiel to tell him to cover it. Flattering portraits flourished. Gabriel jumped in time on the spokesperson for the government that his new spouse was leaving, while Séjourné, in Brussels, saw himself exiled. Feeling the limits approaching, he once again fled to the budget ministry.

Like everywhere, he would leave without an assessment, even before having presented a budget. Minister of Education, he would see himself propelled to Matignon before a school year has been completed and any measure he announced has been implemented. What did it matter that the reforms on harassment, the certificate, the baccalaureate, had not been applied. That no law has been passed.

Agitation, movement and a large communications team - the only advisors who followed him everywhere deal with these issues: obsession, covering up the imposture and protecting oneself from its effects. Imitate the daron.

There is no need to recall what followed, from American tours to the Dutch Bildeberg, between two communication plans with influencers and confessional shows on the biggest television channels. The Marchand-Fogiel-Macron connection has allowed, in recent months, a bombardment on BFM TV which no one spoke about, and which had only one purpose: to prepare public opinion for the rise of the prodigy son of Elysée, modeled on Macron. The dinners with Crespo-Mara and Ardisson, from 7 to 8, will have prepared the way for what is today. It doesn't matter if everything is a lie. It doesn't matter that everything is invented. Today, Prime Minister, he is.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
institutionalized lying

TocsinPeople underestimate the level of lies we live in!

Tocsin - Dec 14, 2023

Interview with Jean-Dominique Michel.

   

www.tocsin-media.fr

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
the LGBT community does not exist

Equality and ReconciliationAlain Soral – The LGBT community does not exist

Equality and Reconciliation - 02 Dec 2023

The president of Equality & Reconciliation deconstructs with implacable logic the fallacious concept of the LGBT community, a deconstruction which applies to all the communities which insinuate themselves, in the Republic, between the citizen and the State.

   

Salutary!

The full show is available on VOD on Kontre Kulture: https://kontrekulture.com/produit/soral-a-presque-toujours-raison-episode-25-nouvelle-2023/

“The LGBT community does not exist: it does not exist legally or in fact. (...) There is an open war between lesbians and homosexuals, even more so, a lesbian defines herself because she does not at all want to be fucked by a man, and a gay man defines himself because women's sex disgusts him! So the LGBTQ+ community is a gas factory where no one really has a common interest. (...) That too is abusive communitarianism. »

Alain Soral

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
cold vasoconstrictors prohibited

Equality and ReconciliationHumex, Actifed, Dolirhume... The real hidden reason for their sudden blacklisting!

Equality and Reconciliation - 26 Oct 2023

Some attentive readers of the mainstream press (known as "mainstream" in French) will have flinched when reading information which appeared in the headlines in recent days and which concerned the new and unexpected dangerousness of certain products. very common pharmaceuticals sold without a prescription for decades.

   

Certainly, many courageous whistleblower doctors have already noted for a long time the uselessness and even the dangerousness of many medications. Let us think of Professors Philippe Even and Bernard Debré and their Guide to the 4 useful, useless or dangerous drugs which earned the radiation of the first and the public vindictiveness of the second. Not even to mention the recent health crisis, which statistician Pierre Chaillot recalls was a pandemic of... people testing positive!

So headlines the press, probably repeating an AFP press release, itself probably remotely controlled from the top of the State, announcing to us at the very beginning of the ENT diseases of the coming winter.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
The Nobel lie

Réseau InternationalThe Nobel lie

International Network - Oct 18, 2023

Doctors, scientists protest Nobel prize awarded to team whose research led to COVID mRNA vaccine technology

   

Controversy has erupted over Monday's Nobel Prize for developing an mRNA vaccine, with critics questioning its safety, pointing to risks identified years ago and alleging Big Pharma has corrupted science in its race to expand commercial applications.

Scientists and doctors critical of Covid-19 vaccines have leveled sharp criticism at the Norwegian Nobel committee after it awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to two University of Pennsylvania biochemists for their work on the development of “effective mRNA vaccines against Covid-19”.

Katalin Karikó, Ph.D., and Drew Weissman, M.D., Ph.D., received the award Monday for their “groundbreaking discoveries … about how mRNA interacts with our immune system [and for contributing] having contributed] to the unprecedented pace of vaccine development during one of the greatest threats to human health in modern times,” according to the Nobel committee press release.

Dr Robert Malone, the renowned inventor of mRNA technology, reacted on X/Twitter:

“Karikó and Weissman get the Nobel Prize, not for inventing mRNA vaccines (because I did), but for adding pseudouridine which made it possible to manufacture an unlimited number of spike toxins in which could have been a safe and effective vaccine platform, if it had been developed in a safe manner.

Dr. Malone challenged the integrity of the price, claiming that Big Pharma was behind it.

“Pfizer has been campaigning for this award since 2020. At first, they claimed (like Karikó) that it invented the mRNA vaccine technology. Pfizer makes large donations to the Karolinska Institute which awards the Nobel Prize. »

Dr. Malone

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Zelensky's lie

VoltairenetThe Zelensky lie is coming to an end

Voltairenet - Sep 27, 2023

President Volodymyr Zelensky's trip to the United States has cleared up the last ambiguities about him. Everyone was wondering about their strategy. He does not seem to be trying to defend his own people, because he mobilizes all his men and sends them to die on the front without hope of victory.

   

From now on he appears not to hesitate to lie, to cheat, and to try by all means to expel certain States from intergovernmental organizations.

How can we not draw a parallel with Stepan Bandera who massacred his own compatriots by the thousands in the last days of the Second World War, that is to say when the defeat of the Reich was in no doubt?

The time for unconditional support is over. Like all their Western counterparts, American parliamentarians have realized that:
- ammunition is lacking and the Western arms industry cannot compete, either in the short or medium term, with that of Russia;
- the rebellion of the owner of the Wagner Group, Yevgeny Prigozhin, against the Kremlin failed;
- the Ukrainian counter-offensive is extremely deadly, more than a thousand deaths per day for two weeks, without achieving any significant success.

Many would therefore like to negotiate a way out of the crisis or, at least, stop spending astronomical sums for nothing. Republicans have written to the Biden administration to request an accurate accounting of how funds already provided have been used. While waiting for a response, they will not vote another dollar. The Pentagon is therefore devising ways to divert equipment and continue the US commitment alongside Ukraine. It hides behind the possible blocking of the federal state budget in the event of a fundamental disagreement between the Capitol and the White House.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Spike forever

Gendarme ProfessionThe 'vaccinated' will continue to make deadly proteins all their lives

Gendarme profession - 10 Sep 2023

Half of people 'vaccinated' against COVID will continue to make deadly spike proteins their entire lives, study finds...

   

Italian and British researchers have found that, contrary to government claims, spike proteins from Fauci flu vaccines persist in recipients' arms for at least six months after injection.

So far, the official narrative is that the spike proteins in Covid vaccines are “harmless” and stay in the arm for a few days. We are told that, at most, the body will only continue to make spike proteins for a very short time, assuming a person has acquired the mRNA variety.
We now know that the body of a fully vaccinated person continues to produce spike proteins indefinitely. The researchers confirmed this, even ruling out the possibility of cross-contamination or infection with a strain of COVID circulating in nature.

To conduct their research, the scientists used a sensitive mass spectrometry-based assay tuned to specifically look for an amino acid sequence that only exists in the vaccine-induced spike protein.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
climate confinement

The 7 of QuebecWhy the Media Pushes Climate Lockdown Fantasies

The 7 of Quebec - August 02, 2023

In February 2021, I wrote an article here at The Spectator titled "Are You Ready for Climate Lockdowns?" »

   

It was about the predictability of the direction the climate alarmist movement was taking and their eagerness to explore the use of the Covid containment model in Europe and the United States to solve environmental problems. The movement has made its way to the idea ever since. Now that heat waves are sweeping the globe in the prime months of the summer season, the media isn't so subtle about the idea — and neither is the Biden administration.

The kind of lockdown I'm referring to, and climate-conscious hacks are alluding to, is not (yet) the action of direct government enforcement, but rather the strong suggestion to "stay home and stay in security ". Another idea that gets oxygen is that complete blackouts in major metropolitan cities, not just continuous blackouts, could play a role in addressing climate change.

At the Los Angeles Times, for example, Sammy Roth published an article last weekend titled "Would an Occasional Blackout Help Solve Climate Change?" In it, Roth also argues for "tens of millions of electric vehicles on the road and tens of millions of electric heat pumps in people's homes." Either Roth doesn't realize the dilemma of electrifying all household appliances, including thermostats, water tanks and stoves, while advocating major power grid outages — or worse, he does.

At The New York Times, Alisha Haridasani Gupta took the usual fear during hot days to another level by directly asking "Is it safe to go out?" How to navigate this cruel summer. Gupta hyperventilates over a "summer of extreme weather in the United States, in which going outside can be riddled with danger."

This week at the University of Colorado Boulder, campus tours were canceled with temperatures barely above 90 degrees. In a notice to attendees, the university wrote: “After your briefing, we will not be conducting the campus tour for your safety, that of our guests and our student ambassador guides. CU-Boulder has replaced visits with a listening panel.

Expect this trend to spread, with more Zoom-style panels and meetings and stay-at-home orders from institutions brimming with members of the pajama class huddled against them.

read the article

Last modification by Nathan- 54 there is
Propaganda

Réseau InternationalWhy you can't know the truth

International Network - Jul 24, 2023

How global news agencies and Western media report on geopolitics.

   

Small houses act as press agencies in certain areas, such as the prestigious BQ, Berard Quelin. The AGEFI partially acted as a press agency, it bore the name of Agency.

Check out the propaganda multiplier.

It is one of the most important aspects of our media system, and yet little known to the public: the bulk of international news coverage in Western media is provided by just three global news agencies based in New York, London and Paris.

The key role played by these agencies means that Western media often cover the same topics, even using the same wording.

Additionally, governments, militaries, and intelligence agencies use these global news agencies as multipliers to spread their messages around the world.

A study of coverage of the war in Syria by nine major European newspapers clearly illustrates these problems: 78% of all stories were based in whole or in part on agency reports, but 0% on own investigative research.

Additionally, 82% of all opinion pieces and interviews were in favor of US and NATO intervention, while propaganda was attributed exclusively to the opposing side.

read the article