Last modification 54 there is
The digitalization of France has “lead in the wing”
The digitalization of France has “lead in the wing”Geolintel - Dec 12, 2023
Reaching 100% fiber by 2025 is increasingly complicated.
Jean-François Fallacher, general manager of Orange France, predicted that “the further we go towards the end, the more complicated it will be”. The difficulties concern poor workmanship, complex connections, slowdown in areas
dense. The replacement of the copper network is not for tomorrow.
Whose fault is it ?
Minister Jean-Noël Barrot reminds that bringing fiber to millions of French people is not magic, “It is not acceptable for elected officials to find themselves on the front line to find solutions to problems that the actors of the sector do not always resolve in sufficient time.”
Jean-François Fallacher notes that when “We arrive at the most complex and costly connections”, “the situation is blocked in the private domain” particularly on the “last meters”.
The sector needs financial resources. “The French are suffering with inflation but we (Orange) increased our prices at the start of the year to compensate for half of the inflation. We will have to find more room for maneuver to work more on quality in the future.” An increase in the price of subscriptions must finance civil engineering.
The investment manager of the Caisse des Dépôts admits that “Either we wait for the State to do something or we take charge of the problem”. A financing system must intervene where “everyone puts their hand in their pocket”.
Such a project in an economic crisis and such a lack of funding will not help make fiber accessible everywhere. One of the solutions remains satellite but competition is very strong, especially with Elon Musk's service, which has been offering this alternative for a while with ease of installation and an affordable cost.
As 100% fiber will not see the light of day, operators are considering 100% very high speed.
The operation of the copper network poses a problem since the subcontractors have closed shop and Orange is struggling to repair the infrastructure. ARCEP indicates that those who have been affected from the beginning and included in the closure of the copper network will have no alternative or exemption.
We risk having digital deserts, leaving the French to fend for themselves in their administrative procedures or in making appointments with the doctor.
Why is the State panicking about the challenges of its ecological transition and territorial cohesion project?
[...]
Last modification 54 there is
Controligarchs: Denunciation of the billionaire class and their secret agreements
Controligarchs: Denunciation of the billionaire class and their secret agreementsThe Defender – Dec 09, 2023
The author of “Controligarchs” denounces “the billionaire class, their secret deals and the globalist plot to dominate your life.
In his new book, “Controligarcs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life,” author Seamus Bruner explores the long history of eugenicists, technocrats and social engineers, from Rockefellers and the Club of Rome to Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, Mark Zuckerberg, Klaus Schwab and other members of the World Economic Forum (WEF) – who use their wealth , often under the guise of philanthropy to enrich ourselves while promoting an undemocratic and dystopian future for the rest of us.
“Imagine a world where you own nothing and rent everything,” Mr. Bruner warns in the book’s notes. “Most of the protein in your diet comes from insects. You are not allowed to have more than one child and your financial and medical data are instantly transferred to a centralized government database using a subcutaneous chip.
Seamus Bruner sat down with The Defender to discuss his book, the state of the world and his view of humanity.
Mr. Bruner, research director at the Government Accountability Institute (GAI), said he honed his craft of investigative journalism by helping GAI founder Peter Schweizer write his book from 2011, Throw Them All Out: How Politicians and Their Friends Get Rich Off Insider Stock Tips, Land Deals, and Cronyism That Would Send the Rest of Us to Prison.” (Throw Them All Out: How Politicians and Their Friends Enrich themselves with Insider Tips, Land Deals, and Cronyism That Would Send the Rest of Us to Jail).
This project resulted in two presentations on the show “60 Minutes” and, ultimately, the adoption of the “Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act” (STOCK Act), passed in 2012, according to Mr. Bruner. “This experience also dissuaded me from entering politics,” he said.
“Following the money is our motto here [at GAI],” said Mr. Bruner, whose subsequent investigations are documented in his books “Compromised: How Money and Politics Drive FBI Corruption” (2018) and “Fallout: Nuclear Bribes , Russian Spies, and the Washington Lies That Enriched the Clinton and Biden Dynasties” (2020, with John Solomon).
Mr Bruner, who is studying to become a certified anti-money laundering specialist, said: “We are not against billionaires conceptually, but against those who want to use their money, their power and their influence to exert control over your life”.
“The ten richest men on the planet – including Gates, [Jeff] Bezos, Zuckerberg and [Elon] Musk – have doubled their combined personal net worth during the Covid-19 pandemic,” writes Seamus Bruner in “Controligarchs,” “while the shrinking middle class has suffered and more than 160 million people across the world [worldwide] have been pushed into poverty.”
“Controligarchs” traces the history of some of the richest families on the planet and how they used their wealth and influence to implement projects such as Agenda 2030, Open Society, The Great Reset and that a transhumanist movement – and organizations such as the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and the Wellcome Trust – translate into a virtual war on farmers and food, on informed consent and options natural healing, against energy and jobs, against freedom of expression and other inalienable rights.
The Rockefellers and the takeover of public health...
Last modification 54 there is
UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 2030: 17 sustainable destruction goals!
UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 2030: 17 sustainable destruction goals!Jacob's Ladder - Nov 10, 2023
The United Nations 2030 Agenda, announced at the United Nations summit in New York in 2015, is a “global treaty for the future” to which national governments should adhere.
This agenda includes 17 “sustainability goals” that seem good at first glance. If we look more closely, we always come back to the same actors who in reality want nothing less than total control over the resources of our planet, a single central global government and therefore the enslavement of all peoples. .
In order to exert influence in all areas of life and structures, these goals are promoted not only by the United Nations itself, but also by influential partners such as the World Economic Forum with its “Great Reset”. For more than 50 years, the WEF has connected the most influential figures in politics, business, science, media, trade unions, NGOs, culture and churches and brought them together with the most rich people of the world.
He has also been educating political and economic elites around the world for over 30 years. Whether it is Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron, Viktor Orban or Vladimir Putin, they have all gone through the WEF school as “Young Global Leaders”. It is therefore not surprising that the founder of the forum, German professor Klaus Schwab, is considered one of the most influential figures today.
The United Nations 2030 Agenda - A 17-point agenda for global domination and the enslavement of all people!
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; This right includes the freedom to hold opinions without hindrance and to seek, receive and disseminate information and ideas through any media and without regard to borders.
United Nations Agenda 2030: Find out below what the concrete and negative effects of the 17 goals are...
Last modification 54 there is
Children: Early sexuality education
Children: Early sexuality educationGendarme profession - 30 Sep 2023
The examples of France and Switzerland are shocking!
Under the pretext of health, ideologies of early sexuality and gender identity are everywhere.
Early sexuality education, gender theories, sexual rights, programs on sexuality are in the headlines of the school year and are causing dissatisfaction. Many parents express their anger at activities that they consider inappropriate or even shocking. In Belgium, the issue is at the center of attention and has given rise to demonstrations against the obligations around 'Emotional and Sexual Relational Life' activities voted on recently. In the background, a desire by international organizations to make sexual health and gender identity a priority on the 2030 agenda.
[...]
Last modification 54 there is
Professor Contreras: “The trap of the 2030 Agenda is in the small print”
Professor Contreras: “The trap of the 2030 Agenda is in the small print”International Network - 23 Sep 2023
The Spanish podcast Luz del Mundo – a production of the Catholic Association of Propagandists (ACdP) and the CEU Ángel Ayala Institute of Human Sciences – tackles a controversial topic this week: the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ).
He does so with the help of philosophy of law professor and former Vox congressman Francisco J. Contreras, who sees him as the most visible face of the UN acting “as a proto-world government.” In a conversation with journalist Ana Campos, Professor Contreras argues that although the Sustainable Development Goals seem at first glance indisputable, “the problem is in the fine print.”
Let's start by asking the question: what is the 2030 Agenda?
It is a document containing 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that the UN approved in 2015 and in which it proposes to Member States a horizon of action, with a period of 15 years to achieve it. This is, let's say, the UN acting as a sort of world government, or proto-world government. Not all countries signed it, but Spain was of course one of the first countries to do so. The PP and the PSOE – because in 2015 there was a Popular Party government – compete in the fervor of the “twenty-thirties”, in the sense that the PP claims to have been the government that signed the agenda, but the PSOE affirms that they are the ones who have done the most to put it into practice.
Eradication of poverty, equality between men and women… Anyone with half a brain would accept these Sustainable Development Goals, right?
It's clear. A sinister vision of the 2030 Agenda is spreading, especially in conservative sectors, as if it were some kind of conspiracy of dark elites to dominate the world... and when you open it and look the objectives really don't seem to be that. This is the case, but it is in a more hidden way. But at first glance, the objectives – almost all of them, because there are a few exceptions – are indisputable. Who would be against the eradication of hunger in the world? Who would be opposed to providing clean water and sanitation to the entire world population? Who would be against the construction of quality health systems everywhere, or against quality education? I list the Sustainable Development Goals…
So what's the catch?
Last modification 54 there is
Sustainable Development Goal 16: Part 1 – Building the Global Police State
International Network - Jul 18, 2023
The United Nations affirms that Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG 16) aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies and ensure access to justice for all.
Behind the rhetoric lies the real objective: to strengthen and consolidate the power and authority of the “global governance regime” and to exploit threats – real or imagined – in order to advance the regime's hegemony.
If we accept the assumption that “sustainable development” is global development that meets the needs of the world's poor, a reasonable person is unlikely to disagree with this stated goal.
But helping the poor is not the goal of SDG 16.
The real purpose of SDG 16 is threefold: (1) to strengthen a global governance regime, (2) to exploit threats, real and imagined, to advance the regime's goals, and (3) to impose on humanity a unjustified, unwanted and centrally controlled global digital identity (digital ID) system.
The UN's digital identity goal is hidden in SDG Goal 16.9:
“By 2030, ensure legal identity and birth registration for all”.
Although SDG 16 does not specifically allude to “digital” identification, that is what it means.
As we will see, the indicators for the SDG 16 target do not reveal the truth either. For example, the only “indicator” to measure progress on SDG 16.9 (16.9.1) is:
“The proportion of children under 5 whose births were registered with a civil authority, by age”.
One could therefore think that the task of “providing a legal identity” falls primarily on the so-called “civil authorities”. This is not the case.
Within the UN system, all governments (whether local, county, provincial, state or federal) are “stakeholder partners” in a global network made up of a wide range of organizations public and private. Many are explicitly supported by the United Nations or hosted on their premises, and all advocate digital ID as a key mechanism for achieving SDG 16.
This aspect of SDG 16 will be explored in more detail in Part 2.
This global amalgamation of organizations often uses one term to describe itself: it is a global public-private partnership (G3P).
The G3P works tirelessly to create the conditions necessary to justify the imposition of global governance “with teeth” and its indispensable digital identification system. In doing so, the G3P reverses the nature of our rights. He fabricates and exploits crises in order to claim the legitimacy of the “solutions” he proposes.
The G3P includes virtually all intergovernmental organizations, governments, global corporations, major philanthropic foundations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and civil society groups. Collectively, they form the “stakeholders” who implement sustainable development, and in particular SDG 16.
Digital ID will determine our access to public services, our central bank digital currency (CBDC) wallets, our “vaccine” certificates – everything, even the food and drink we are allowed to buy and consume.
Suspicious citizens are alert to potential abuses of digital ID by their authorities. In countries where a national digital ID is not welcome, such as the UK, G3P's solution is to build an "interoperable" system that links different digital ID systems together. This “modular platform” approach is designed to avoid the political problems that the formal issuance of a national digital ID card would otherwise create.
Establishing the global digital identity of SDG 16.9 is essential for eight of the seventeen UN SDGs. It is the fulcrum at the center of a global digital panopticon that is being conceived under the auspices of the UN's global public-private partnership “regime”.
Last modification 54 there is
Agenda 2030: Are France and EU countries "test" countries?
Agenda 2030: Are France and EU countries "test" countries?France Evening - June 04, 2023
The 2030 Agenda is both that of the United Nations and that of the World Economic Forum in Davos.
In an article from 2016 (Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better*), Forbes magazine offered a comprehensive description that is sure to catch the attention of readers!
*Welcome to 2030: I own nothing, I have no privacy and life has never been better
“Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city - or should I say, "our city". I own nothing. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or clothes.
It may sound strange to you, but it makes perfect sense to us in this town. Everything you thought of as a product has become a service. We have access to transport, accommodation, food and everything we need in our daily lives. One by one, all of these things became free, so it didn't make sense for us to own a lot anymore.”
However, the very interesting description of this agenda had already been proposed some thirty years ago by Americans in a document entitled "Silent weapons for quiet wars".
A few passages from the objectives and strategies are reproduced below to illustrate this article.
The analysis proposed in this document would a priori have been established by members of the Bilderberg Group and by American officers or members of the CIA. All this information is specified in the introduction, which is highly recommended to read in its entirety. It was written and signed by Gregory Allan in 1996.
Last modification 54 there is
You will starve and you will be happy?
International Network - May 28, 2023
Everything is therefore going as planned, that is to say quite badly and with an alarming growth of ideas, each more weak than the other: since the pandemic has not caused enough fear to allow an effective enslavement of the entire population , it was understood, as of last year, that climatic hysteria would take over.
Thanks to ecological trepidations, it becomes easy to put in place increasingly coercive and increasingly violent policies as the injunctions increasingly encroach on the fundamental freedoms of individuals. The latter having the nerve to exist and not always agree, it will therefore be necessary to crush them (including nevertheless) in order to guarantee that the small ecological projects are set up without obstacles.
Thus, in the Netherlands and despite such growing discontent as evoked in a biased way by a press at the appalling level of propaganda, the idea of eliminating a major part of small and medium-sized agricultural holdings continues to gain ground. The protests do not change anything: democracy, a river that is played only when it comes to finding pretexts to increase taxes or go to war, no longer interests anyone here.
In France, if the words are translated, the music remains the same: gently, and without much discretion, the first seeds of a forced agricultural decrease are planted by a Court of Auditors which has become the astonishing transmission belt of the Far East. Macronian Center. For her, it's obvious, we must “define and make public a strategy for reducing the cattle herd”.
It is not a question of nitrogen pollution (the stupid excuse used by the excited Batavians) but rather the methane emissions of cattle, another idiocy proudly put forward by the enraged French to pass their nonsense. The argument is disarmingly stupid, but it is nevertheless this: the climate is warming up, it is therefore the fault of human activities, it is therefore because of its consumption of meat, it is therefore because the cattle fart on methane, so it is necessary to reduce the herd (by half, let's say, because it is an easy ratio to understand).
Do not look in the “therefore” for any logic, any reasoning. It is the environmental Science™ that speaks, therefore the Truth™.
Last modification 54 there is
Water meters on your private wells, no more free water...
Water meters on your private wells, no more free water...The Free Thinker - May 06, 2023
Meanwhile Coca-Cola plunders water resources to make bottled poison!
You don't need to be a mathematician or a physics genius, let alone an artificial intelligence genius, to understand how completely meaningless this charade of drought and water management is. Firstly because it rained a lot in March and April and despite floods and floods, the propaganda continues to explain to us that we are going to run out of water. But even worse, when everyone has to tighten their belts, when we will have to pay more for water, the Coca-Cola company continues to plunder France's water resources to produce an ultra-sweet drink. very dangerous for health and responsible for an incalculable number of diseases such as diabetes, obesity, dental caries… We announce it to you now, no restriction will concern Coca-Cola or Pepsi-Cola in the near future. On the other hand, you will be required to put a water meter on your well, you will be prohibited from watering your plants, filling your swimming pool...
Of course, Coca-Cola will explain that they will stop pumping water from the groundwater table, but don't worry, the 800 m³ used annually on the Grigny site will be pumped elsewhere, because it is absolutely necessary to continue selling. this dangerous poison.
It is always convenient to have a well at home. Especially if it helps reduce the drinking water bill. And the law authorizes it: article 552 of the civil code stipulates that the owner of a land is also the owner of his basement, up to 10 meters deep.
But since January 1, a decree has changed the situation. Well owners must now declare their installation to the town hall. If the installation is prior to December 31, 2008, there are only a few days left, until December 31, to declare it. If you want to build, the declaration is, of course, also mandatory. But what about a simple statement? At first glance, nothing too compelling. Except that it is also necessary to equip the well with a device for counting the volume of water withdrawn. In short: install a meter.
Last modification 54 there is
Thermal colanders: after the ban on renting, that of selling
Thermal colanders: after the ban on renting, that of sellingCounterpoints - March 26, 2023
Europe claims to accelerate the movement and remove thermal colanders and to do this, it has found nothing better than to ban their sale.
Being the owner of a thermal sieve in France is bad! It's so bad that if your property's Energy Performance Diagnosis score is classified F or G, you no longer have the right to rent it without having renovated it beforehand.
This is how we could very briefly summarize the mechanism concerning the rental of the Climate and Resilience law of August 22, 2021, which will have a fairly significant impact. Indeed, according to the results of a study undertaken by the FNAIM at the end of 2022, 500 housing units will slowly but surely be released from the rental sector.
This study also indicated that the owners were not resistant to this upgrading. If they don't, it's mainly because they have no choice.
Thus, 93% of respondents explain their difficulty in carrying out the work because of the cost, 60% mention technical problems and finally 40% specify that to launch them they are dependent on the decisions of co-ownership and the deadlines imposed on them by the community.
Still, there will be roughly 500 fewer homes available for rent, which will be added to the three million already vacant, thus accentuating the difficulties of finding accommodation.
This French provision only directly targeted lessor owners, indirectly impacting owner-occupiers since the price of their property began to depend on the label of the DPE and therefore to vary according to it.
Last modification 54 there is
War on Global Agriculture: The UN's 'Sustainable' 2030 Agenda
International Network - Dec 04, 2022
Over the past few weeks, a coordinated assault on our agriculture – the ability to produce the food necessary for human existence – has begun.
The recent G20 government meeting in Bali, the UN Agenda 27 COP2030 meeting in Egypt, the World Economic Forum in Davos and Bill Gates are all complicit. Typically, they use a dystopian linguistic framework to give the illusion that they are doing good, when in reality they are advancing an agenda that will lead to the starvation and death of hundreds of millions, if not billions of people. if allowed to continue. It is run by a silver coalition.
Last modification 54 there is
Netherlands: takeover by the State of around 600 farms
Netherlands: takeover by the State of around 600 farmsEel under the Rock - Oct 19, 2022
Despite protests from tens of thousands of farmers, the Dutch government is now considering state takeover of around 600 farms over the next year.
In other words, the Dutch government is forcing hundreds of farmers to sell their land to the state.
In a tweet, political commentator, host and former member of the Forum for Democracy party, Eva Vlaardingerbroek said: “Our criminal government has announced (Wednesday 5 October) that it will accelerate the theft of our farmers' land. 500 to 600 farmers will be forced to sell their land to the state over the next year. Farmers have announced new protests, so stay tuned. »
She called the Dutch plan a “theft”.
“The Dutch government is accelerating the expropriation of our farmers, pushing some of them to commit suicide. They are a bunch of inhuman and greedy liars and thieves who have created a false crisis to rob people of their rights and property. »
