The definitions of the Devil have changed with the times and mentalities. Evil is no longer filled with the same things, the same fears, it does not arouse the same rejection. 2000 years ago, it was about fallen or protective angels, Jesus, the Father, the desert, temptation...
These images have not disappeared, they have been redefined. We can also keep them as symbols, because they still work: never believe that human consciousness has greatly improved in 2000 years. When we see today's government...
Precisely, many French people, not necessarily Catholics or Muslim-believers, reject this government as we reject the Devil. There is reason: this small assembly of cynical and contemptuous creatures cannot be loved by the people. In addition, she hits him, via the force of the State, which she has privatized, which does not help anything: there are blows from Jarnac, batons, false information, price increases, assumed insults... Macron and mini-Macron said that we must “fuck” the anti-vaxxers, who nevertheless saved the honor of France during Covid terrorism.
The Devil, today, is no longer in the details, he shows himself in broad daylight, because he thinks he has won: his ideology is shared by the greatest number of people. These are liberal values: individualism, feminism, homosexualism, anti-Christianity, mercantilism, which lead to the social and societal disaster that we know.
Welcome to the Diablos forum
French society, founded on the French spirit, must be destroyed, so that Anglo-American mercantilism, demeaning of souls, reigns. We see who does evil today on Earth, who provokes wars, who exploits conflicts, who plays on separatism, between sexes, between races and between classes.
From then on, everyone can see the Illuminati talking, thinking they are the masters of the world, even though they are within range of a riot. Secret societies are no longer secret, we even film ourselves entering them, we give interviews, advice to the poor, we remake the world, you name it.
The Illuminati have become stars, they climb the steps, like at the Élysée, Cannes or Hollywood. Attached is the arrival of the “special guests” of the Davos 2024 forum. Protected by 5000 Swiss soldiers, they pretend to fear an attack, but they run no risk: they are the great terrorists of the world.
This year’s theme is “Rebuilding Trust.”
“You can almost feel the magic of the place when you’re there,” one Davos regular told the Post.
“Everyone has an agenda and you never know who you're going to run into when you come out of the bathroom. It could be Bill Gates. »You meet some of the smartest people in the world, but one thing you learn is that they're not always that smart.
The usually quiet Swiss city is getting ready to welcome the world's elite and unlimited champagne. The action begins at the Convention Center (front), which is ground zero for the WEF annual conference. The caviar is in place, here in waffle cones, for the World Economic Forum's elite cocktails that begin as soon as the masters of the universe land.
Klaus Schwab, the president of the WEF, although portrayed as a veritable Dr. Evil in far-right circles, is probably more of a high-flying PT Barnum than a sinister global conspirator.
Last year, Vanity Fair noted that Schwab “transformed the Forum from a serious meeting of policy makers into a glittering assembly of the world's richest people.” He achieved this by currying favor with those in power, particularly the billionaire class - a tribe known as the Davos man.
But not all men - or women - in Davos are equal: there is a caste system that separates the merely connected from the top of the elite.
Everyone must wear a colored badge with their full name at all times, and color is an instant way to judge their importance. Color is an instant way to judge one's importance (real flexibility is being so famous that you hide your badge).
Goldie Hawn gesticulated while wearing a badge on a lanyard in front of the “World Economic Forum” brand. Badges are the caste system at Davos: even celebrities, like 2014 attendee Goldie Hawn, are expected to wear them at all times. Their color places the wearer in a strict hierarchy. AP
Davos entry badge FAQ. Who gets it? What it means.
The complex system of badges is a way to know not only who a personality is, but also whether they are worth talking to. The Reuters news agency has compiled a light – but well-informed – guide to these badges. @AndrewLawton/X
White badges are the most expensive accreditations, but they are only available to top business leaders.
It's not enough to be CEO: your company must be known to everyone, or at least to the biggest boards of directors.
If you look up 'namedropping' in the dictionary, you'll see a picture of Davos," Skybridge Capital founder and chairman Anthony Scaramucci, who has been attending Davos since 2007, told the Post.
The founder and chairman of Skybridge Capital, Anthony Scaramucci, participated in 2019 in the wine evening he organizes every year in Davos.
Naomi Campbell, all smiles, in a long black coat with a jeweled bag posed in front of a large star painted with the number 23. The top model is one of the glamorous globalists who will travel to Davos in 2024.
Other, more modest badges, in a rainbow of colors, are given to entourages of white badge holders, CEOs and leaders of smaller nonprofit organizations, media, WEF staff and to the legions of employees who meet their needs.
Political heavyweights like Chinese Premier Li Qiang, French President Emmanuel Macron, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, national security adviser Jake Sullivan and President Biden's climate envoy John Kerry will jostle to get invitations to the best cocktails of the year.
So will Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine, Javier Milei, newly elected President of Argentina, Naomi Campbell, model, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, of the World Health Organization, and Tirana Hassan, from Human Rights Watch...
It looks like the NEOM project crossed with the city of 4. The video was shown in front of the masters of the world gathered in Davos. The viewing scene leaked to Twitter and sparked a collective intelligence chain reaction...
We are far from the abbey of Thélème de Rabelais. Let's not forget the British version, more Europeanized, this famous city where everything is a 15-minute walk from home, and of which Anne of Paris dreams. It is far from it, with its destroyed street furniture, its infernal traffic jams and its rats by the millions.
This week, the global elites who are supposed to tackle world issues, such as "climate change", at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, will also be partying.
Demand for sex workers by business tycoons and executives around the world is skyrocketing during the five-day summit.
An escort named “Liana” told German newspaper Bild that she dressed in business attire to blend in with the elite crowd during the summit. She clarified that her client is an American who is attending the meeting. She charges 700 euros per hour and 2 euros for the whole night.
She highlights the "dark side of Davos", telling Bild that the demand for prostitutes is skyrocketing during the meeting. An escort service also confirmed that sex workers will be very busy this week:
"Bosses book escorts in the hotel suite for themselves and their employees," the manager of an escort service told Swiss newspaper 20 Minuten. The manager told the sex workers that their services would be in high demand over the next few days.
Lights! Stock ! Reset!
The major media of the collective West, in unison, will run non-stop, for a week, all the "news" good to print to praise the new versions of the Great Reset, renamed The Great Story, but in reality presented as a benign offer of “participatory capitalism”. These are the main planks of the shady platform of a shady NGO registered in Cologny, an affluent suburb of Geneva.
The list of participants in Davos has been leaked. Proverbially, it is a celebration of Anglo-American exceptionalism, with the presence of top intelligence officials such as the Director of US National Intelligence, Avril "Madame Torture" Haines, the head of MI6 Richard Moore and the FBI Director Christopher Wray.
One could write remixed encyclopedias of Diderot and d'Alembert on Davos pathology – where an impressive list of multi-billionaires, heads of state and business darlings (owned by BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and others)” engage” in selling packages of demented dystopia to the unsuspecting masses.
But let's cut to the chase and focus on a few panels from next week, which could easily be mistaken for "Straight to Hell" sessions.
The list for Tuesday, January 17 is particularly interesting. It includes a panel entitled “De-globalization or re-globalization? with speakers Ian Bremmer, Adam Tooze, Niall Ferguson, Péter Szijjártó and Ngaire Woods. Three Atlanticists/exceptionalists stand out, notably the ultra-toxic Ferguson.
“The Federal Parliament has set a cap of 5 personnel who will serve in support during the WEF, which will run from January 000 to 10. Some of them will be stationed directly in Davos, where the annual meeting will be held from January 26 to 16,” the statement read.
Other military personnel will guard infrastructure and provide services related to air force logistics and operations throughout Switzerland, the statement said. The soldiers will be authorized to “use coercive police measures to carry out their respective tasks”, specifies the government.
The number of participants in the forum is not yet defined. According to the latest information, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, Ecuadorian President Guillermo Lasso and Colombian President Gustavo Petro intend to attend the Davos forum personally.
G20 to impose vaccine passports for international travel (Zerohedge.com): Indonesian Health Minister Budi Gunadi Sadikin (sic) has called for the creation of a digital health certificate using WHO standards Bill Gates. The cretins or agents who play the Freedom trick on us that comes from the Brics and the odds and ends make fun of the world: Lula's Brazil is sold to labs and to the vaccine, China controls its sick and hungry population like crazy, Russia becomes an authoritarian regime entangled in an Orwellian war (I know, it's the Katechon…) and Modi's India has liquidated the cash thanks to Amazon and Microsoft.
Governments are OK to digitize and destock their herd. The controversy over the eight billion men is swelling and will accelerate our depopulation (says Spanish weather forecast). Any dispute will be considered terrorist: cf. the mad minister from New Zealand.
“As long as everyone, bourgeois and workers, gathers in front of their television to let themselves be humiliated in this way, we will only be left with the impotence of despair. »
Immediately after the evidence of the gas pipelines burst, everyone (including myself) came up with their theories about who the culprit was.
Many are reflexively pointing to statements by Joe Biden and Victoria Nuland regarding the removal of the Nordstream 2 gas pipeline before the war in Ukraine broke out. But, so what? Why wait seven months to carry out this threat? And why get rid of Nordstream 1 at the same time?
The argument is based on the idea that the United States is now a rogue state entirely controlled by neoconservatives who see an opportunity to kill two geopolitical birds with one stone, by going to war against Russia while by regaining domination over a vassal Europe.
This is indeed the feeling that prevails in all of the anti-American alternative media. From Pepe Escobar to Bernard of Moon of Alabama, the eagerness to make the connection between motive (Escobar) and means (MoA) is quite compelling.
However, I disagree...
Not living up to its villainous reputation, the World Economic Forum published an article suggesting that it would be "sound and rational" to implant microchips in children. Yes really.
The idea is promoted in a blog post on the elite Davos site, which discusses the future of augmented reality and an "augmented society".
The article advances the idea that augmented humans are inevitable and that global elites must establish a monopoly of power over technology in order to regulate it “ethically”.