How is it possible that a nation like France which spends more than 300 billion euros each year on its health system cannot afford a Data Hub to secure all its health data? It's inconceivable, we have the means to do it but we are not doing it in order to offer health data to the US Big Data giants. It is extremely humiliating but it perfectly shows what the political agenda of the current regime is.
In the absence of a European service provider, the CNIL has validated the hosting of French health data at Microsoft, for a period of three years. And this, despite “the risk of communication to foreign powers”.
The CNIL has authorized the temporary hosting at the American Microsoft of a health data warehouse for research powered by Health Insurance, a first for the French guardian of digital freedoms, according to a decision published Wednesday on Legifrance.
Until now, the CNIL had never agreed to authorize warehouses supplied with data from the National Health Data System (SNDS, managed by Health Insurance), if these were to be hosted on a platform “ cloud” – dematerialized IT infrastructure – non-European.
Risk of access by American authorities
The CNIL highlighted the risk of access to data by foreign authorities, with American laws with extraterritorial reach in their sights in particular. Thanks to these laws, American authorities can require in certain cases that American cloud operators provide them with data stored there, wherever it is in the world...
Privacy campaign group Digital Rights Ireland has called for an investigation into the collection of electricity consumption data by ESB Networks smart meters. The group says the semi-state company collects more data than it needs for billing purposes and customers are unaware of the data collection.
The installation of smart meters began in 2020 and has been installed in over 800 homes. The goal is to replace all meters with smart meters by 000.
Last month, ESB Networks reconfigured smart meters to collect detailed data every half hour. These data are stored in a centralized database. DRI claims that customers have not consented to this data collection. The group also questions the legal basis for the data collection and asks the Data Protection Commission (DPC), a privacy watchdog, to investigate.
In the previous article, we described social networks as a hyper-media, a weapon of espionage and propaganda coveted by States. A weapon of which we are the ammunition, by the data we leave behind.
We will see how to avoid spying on social networks both on their platforms and outside them.
Of course, the best way to avoid having your data stolen is to never go on social networks. We do not miss much to do without Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or Tiktok. However, even as a user, one can limit the case.
Avoid mobile. A mobile application has more possibilities than a simple web page. If you accept the permissions a bit quickly, it's open bar! The app can analyze your photos, your contacts, your SMS, your calls, your GPS position.
All of these things are impossible with a simple website. Also, the site stops once the tab is closed. While apps can run constantly in the background. It is therefore better to access social networks through a web browser rather than a mobile application.
This collection will mark a new turning point in data collection and surveillance for the SSB, as the agency now seeks to compel private companies, not just public companies, to comply with state surveillance. Given the increase in identity theft in Norway, many are concerned about the need for more data collection.
The mistake would be to think that digital surveillance is limited to your smartphone. Certainly, this tool is a formidable spy that allows the State to know everything about you as long as the data providers transmit the information that goes well. But we must be aware that the coronavirus epidemic has given the police the opportunity to make great progress in their surveillance projects.
In France, for example, in December 2020, decrees were passed authorizing the filing of all citizens according to their philosophical opinions. The following year, parliament passed a law allowing real-time facial recognition of people participating in a protest.