Interview.
The pipes are attacked with a grinder, the CGT Énergie cuts the juice to elected officials supporting the pension reform, 5G antennas burn everywhere, 200 activists equipped with crowbars clean up a Lafarge cement plant and megabasins are lacerated with a cutter. So many actions constituting good reasons to approach the history of sabotage with Victor Cachard, author of several recent works on the subject. An interview conducted on the terrace of a Lyon café with the apt name: le Court-circuit.
CQFD: In the processions against the pension reform, the crowd often chants the triptych "Strike, blockage, sabotage". Long put aside, is the practice of sabotage as a tool of struggle regaining momentum?
Cover of volume 1 of the book Histoire du sabotage
Victor Cachard, History of sabotage: volume 1 “From shoe draggers to machine breakers, Éditions Libre, 2022; volume 2 “Neutralizing the techno-industrial system”, same publisher, to be published.
Yes, and that's good, but the term sabotage is still scary. It took on a warlike connotation with the resistance during World War II. In the collective memory, it is associated with the blasting of railway tracks, or with the idea of a discreet attack, a blow to the back, a little loose...
However, sabotage occupies an important place in the history of struggles and it was massively used by workers from the end of the 19th century. Little is known about it, but at the end of its third congress in 1897, the CGT officially adopted it as a union tactic under the impulse of the anarchists. This mode of action, like the general strike, is the foundation of the trade union struggle!
Émile Pouget, a revolutionary whose anthology you published [1], says that sabotage is as old as the exploitation of workers...
It was practiced long before it was theorized as a tactic of struggle. Historically, the exploited have been able, in isolation, to slow down in the face of unbearable demands, or to voluntarily and discreetly produce bad work. Contrary to popular belief, sabotage does not refer to the wooden shoe (hoof) that would be thrown into the machine. This is the name given in the 13th century to a small wooden top which, when it turns, gives the impression of being motionless. Like the worker who pretends to do a good job. “Bad pay, bad work,” said the English. Sabotage is primarily a defensive attitude, directly linked to work. It was finally under the impetus of the French revolutionary syndicalists that the term gained its offensive character.
0:16 - The first part retraces the history of what must objectively be called an act of war, with disastrous economic consequences, particularly for Germany and France.
18:53 - While the Euro-Atlanticist media carefully denigrated and then suppressed Pulitzer Prize winner Seymour Hersh's revelations of direct US involvement in this sabotage, the March 7, 2023 edition of The New York Times published a any new version which this time attributes the responsibility for this sabotage, no longer to Russia, but to pro-Ukrainian fishermen.
In the second part of this video, François Asselineau demonstrates the implausibility of this new narrative and castigates the pusillanimity of the French executive who has not issued any protest against the United States while France is affected at the heart of its economy. . On the contrary, Macron once again folded in front of Biden.
François Asselineau denounces what is perhaps even more serious: all the so-called oppositions which, from the RN to the NUPES and the PCF, have not protested either against this act of war aimed at permanently weakening France. and to rule out any peaceful solution in Ukraine.
US Navy divers planted explosives under the Nord Stream gas pipelines last summer (during NATO's "Operation Baltops 22", June 5-17, 2022), which the Norwegians activated three months later. later, on September 26, by dropping a buoy from an airplane which caused them to explode.
The operation was led by Jacob Sullivan (National Security Advisor), Antony Blinken (Secretary of State) and Victoria Nuland (Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs). These three personalities are part of the very restricted circle of disciples of the philosopher Leo Strauss. Its planning began in December 2021, that is to say two months before the Russian military intervention in Ukraine in application of Security Council resolution 2202 (presented as an “invasion” by NATO propaganda) .
...
Public chat Réseau International you will find the full article translated into French.
If we look coldly at the event, we will make a double observation: by having recourse to terrorism, kyiv shows the limits of its power; but, like any terrorist act, the objective is to provoke a disproportionate reaction from the adversary.
Several sources within the Ukrainian state apparatus have claimed responsibility for the action, even in the entourage of President Zelenski.
A terrorist act always aims to be spectacular. But it also signs the attack capacity of those who commit the attack. By openly claiming responsibility for the attempt to destroy the bridge, the Ukrainian government reveals, however, that it is in a weak position. Terrorism is the weapon of the weak.