Last modification 54 there is
To those who are still waiting, but who think no less
To those who are still waiting, but who think no lessProfession Gendarme - March 18, 2024
This text is thought provoking and deserves to be published here so that everyone, regardless of social rank, can make it their own.
To those who will intervene, perhaps, but who are waiting for orders from their superiors;
– To those who among these superiors still have a sense of honor and country, because there are some.
– To those among the military who still know what a real Frenchman is, and the real France, our real values, our culture with a capital letter, because a noble culture;
– To those who stand straight in their boots at the level of the Spirit as much as at the level of the feet;
– To those who are no longer fooled by the macronescu-circus and its evil cohort of “cutes” including Attal, of organizing vampires like Attali-Rothschild and company;
– To those who still love our beautiful language, our culture, our History;
– To those whose choice of a military career had as moral and spiritual sign, the love of France;
– To those who refuse to swallow one more lie, one more deception, one more crime on the part of those who govern, whether they are puppets or even endowed with free will which they deviate;
– To those among the officers who say: “Enough”, but who still say it too quietly when the time for action is there, in absolute urgency;
– To those among the ranks who want to be able to look at themselves in the mirror without remorse or guilt in two or three years, the time scale being reduced to act;
– To those who still remember our great soldiers, including Joan of Arc (yes), but also General (posthumous Marshal) Leclerc de Hautecloque, who knew how to go beyond orders and sometimes free themselves from command to the good and salvation of the country;
– To those who move forward in life with an enlightened conscience, a Christian conscience, the one that built glorious France over many centuries.
– To those, extremely rare, of course, who would have the stuff of which heroes are made;
– To those who do not at all want France and all its inhabitants, plus undoubtedly a good part of Europeans, to be atomized in no time, in a few weeks, days or hours, because of the crazy and its non-human clique who decide our DEATH: They have already started their gravedigger work, with confinement, the "vaccine" and apartheid, the inclusive, the villainous laws that we never stop quoting and whose vocation is the stake, laws voted by deputies at a very low intellectual, cerebral and spiritual level, but at a very high venal level;
– To those who still have this little thing that we share with animals: the survival instinct;
– To those who still have a well-constructed brain, in the words of Michel de Montaigne, according to the instruction given until the beginning of the 80s, who love our History and who remember that France must carry the torch, not the trick of the Olympic circus, but the torch of conscience and the highly spiritual mission of France, since its baptism in the fifth century.
That may not be a lot of people, but sometimes it was single men and women who knew how to lead enough people to save France, and among these heroes, let us mention our heroines:
– Geneviève, then a young woman mayor of Paris (and yes) who with only a guard of one hundred individuals, knew how to get rid of the terrible HUNS, by inviting the entire population to prayer to Mary!
She became Saint Geneviève.
– Jeanne (probably half-sister of the dauphin, appeared out of nowhere, not at all a shepherdess, but raised in a family of minor nobility, teenager who led the army to victory against the English invader!
Their spirit is always with us, and it is a strength in us, if we still know how to have true faith, not that of the frogs of the font, of the bless-yes-wism which brings the invader and the maintenance into its imposture, but resistance.
[...]
Last modification 54 there is
MPs alerted to the liberticidal excesses of a bill
MPs alerted to the liberticidal excesses of a billFrance Evening - Feb 13, 2024
BonSens.org alerts deputies to the liberticidal excesses of the bill on sectarian abuses
In a letter to deputies entitled "bill on sectarian abuses", the BonSens.org association alerts the national representation to the unacceptable clauses for democracy, fundamental freedoms, freedom of expression which range from scientific debates to freedom of expression of scientists and doctors and protection of whistleblowers.
The letter was sent on February 9, 2024 to the presidents of groups in the National Assembly as well as to those not registered and by email to each French deputy so that they become aware of this critical situation. Namely the fact that the Law Commission saw fit to restore “those articles which only found validity in the worst dictatorships.”
“With this bill that you are preparing to vote on, and in particular articles 4 and 5, these medical and scientific alerts could no longer be launched under penalty of risk of imprisonment and fines for those who risk doing so.”
The entire letter is reproduced below.
Madam Deputy, Mr. Deputy
This is a very serious time for our democracy, our fundamental freedoms, the freedom of scientific debate, the freedom of doctors and scientists to express themselves, and the protection of whistleblowers.
You will soon have to vote on a bill [1] aimed at “strengthening the fight against sectarian abuses”. In this text of law, however recently expunged by the Senate of three articles dangerous for our republican and democratic life, in particular articles 4 and 5, aimed at establishing new offenses in the Penal Code, the law commission saw fit to restore these articles which only found validity in the worst dictatorships.
If you are not convinced of the danger represented by these articles 4 and 5, you must remember that recent history has revealed, thanks to a free press and courageous whistleblowers, numerous health scandals where the authorities themselves the same were condemned. Here are two fairly recent examples that you certainly haven't forgotten yet.
In the case of MEDIATOR from SERVIER laboratories [2], a drug marketed for 33 years from 1976 to 2009, accused of having caused the death of 1 to 500 people in France, not counting those still suffering from the consequences of side effects .
The whistleblower of the time was the pulmonologist IRÈNE FRACHON.
The CONDEMNATIONS were handed down in 2021 (and in 2023 after appeal by the Servier Group)
The Serviera Group was found guilty of endangering health, fraud, homicide and involuntary injuries, influence peddling and improperly obtaining marketing and fined 180 million euros paid to the victims and 415 million euros to social organizations/Mutuals
The ANS was fined 303 euros for negligence. (at the time Afssaps for French Agency for the Safety of Health Products)
In the LEVOTHYROX case [3], the change in the drug's formula in 2017 by Merck led to numerous reports of adverse effects in pharmacovigilance and victims filed complaints. The ANSM assured that the adverse effects were due to a thyroid imbalance caused by the change in treatment and not to the new formula. However, in March 2018, a criminal investigation was opened. Researchers from the University of Toulouse concluded that the new formula did not provide sufficient guarantees for patients. Merck was convicted in 2020 for having committed a mistake during the change of formula and had to pay 3,3 million euros to the plaintiffs.
At the end of 2022, Merck was indicted for aggravated deception and ANSM was also indicted for deception.
There were also the cases of contaminated blood, Dépakine, Distilbene, growth hormones, Isomeride, Vioxx, Thalidomide that the French remember.
With this bill that you are preparing to vote on, and in particular articles 4 and 5, these medical and scientific alerts could no longer be launched under penalty of risk of imprisonment and fines for those who risk doing so.
It is critical that you realize this.
Even the Council of State has spoken out against these provisions.
In an opinion dated November 9, 2023 [4], the COUNCIL OF STATE considered that the targeted facts were already covered by the repression of the illegal practice of medicine. According to this opinion, the measure could infringe on freedom of expression, when it is exercised through "a general and impersonal speech, for example held on a blog or a social network" and call into question, "by an incrimination of challenges to the current state of therapeutic practices, the freedom of scientific debates and the role of whistleblowers.
What is true one day in science is not always true the next day, and this has been the case since the world began because science is constantly evolving through new data that emerges.
Constructive criticism and questioning of information are essential aspects of the scientific process, and this should be done transparently and respectfully. A scientific consensus only has value over a limited period and only if it takes into account divergent opinions Science is an ongoing debate, stifling this debate in the name of a false consensus amounts to killing both any progress or any corrective mechanism. It is the pluralism of ideas – and not censorship – that makes us progress.
Faced with the abnormal and often illegal influence (known corrupt practices and taking of interest) of pharmaceutical laboratories in Public Health decisions, it is essential to preserve the safeguard of freedom of expression on these issues. health, and in particular for doctors, scientists, and citizen defense associations or associations of victims of adverse drug reactions.
For example, because the marketing authorizations for Covid-19 vaccines were only based on clinical trials carried out by the vaccine manufacturers themselves, and no randomized clinical study had been carried out. independently, then we are witnessing a resounding failure undermining public discourse, changing discourse according to new data. Unfortunately today, traditional vaccination suffers from these errors, from these erroneous announcements by health authorities which have lost credibility.
Remember, in the Covid-19 crisis that we went through, the discourse of the health authorities evolved from: “All vaccinated, All protected” with “safe and effective” vaccines with 95% effectiveness towards a discourse where vaccines ultimately did not protect against infection, but only serious forms and, finally several months after the start of vaccinations, recognized serious adverse effects of myocarditis and pericarditis especially in young men, a population not at risk who had not need to be vaccinated and who have been put at unnecessary risk of a chronic illness potentially with a very serious course, or hemorrhagic menstrual disorders (recognized late by health authorities) potentially requiring hospitalization in young women whose At this time there is no certainty about the impact this may have had on their fertility.
Remember, there was even an abandonment of certain vaccines (AstraZeneca, Johnson and Johnson) for those under 55 due to very serious risks of thrombosis, including the death of young Anthony Rio, 24, who was recognized linked to vaccination [5]. Without the alerts of doctors, scientists, victims' associations, how many deaths could these vaccines have caused among young people?
In History, this is always how health scandals have been brought to light: through the free speech of doctors, scientists, citizens, victims' associations, citizens' associations, who fight for months or even years. years, before the health authorities reacted or the courts could rule.
Did you think about this law from an international point of view? Do you know that treatments against certain pathologies are authorized in certain countries (Covid19 [6] [7], Cancer [8] [9], Lyme Disease [10] etc) and not in others like France? What do you think of the health authorities in these countries? What are sects? Just because their national protocols are different from those decided in France by the ANSM and the HAS9? Do you see the nonsense of this law?
And finally have you thought about French scientific research?
When article 4 of the draft announces “When these offenses are committed through the written or audiovisual press, the specific provisions of the laws which govern these matters are applicable with regard to the determination of the persons responsible. ", but what about the foreign press and media?
Legally, could French scientists who publish in a foreign journal be liable to prosecution depending on the content of their study or their scientific position?
Article 4 of this bill [11] would prevent French scientists from publishing their work, including in French and international scientific journals, and this would be a major risk for the credibility of French research.
Certainly the Order of Physicians has not thought about it because it does not carry out scientific research, but YOU must think about it and prevent this.
It is essential to vote against articles 4 and 5 of the bill against “sectarian abuses” because these articles have nothing to do with the subject of sects, they are only censorship dangerous for science and for public health .
To conclude, it seems important to us to recall that freedom of expression was successively enshrined in article 11 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (August 24, 1789 [12], article 10 of 1950 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [13] and Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [14].
Articles 4 and 5 of this bill also recall dark hours in history and in particular the Law of Suspects [15].
Passed on August 12, 1793, in the midst of the Terror of which it became the best instrument, this law allowed the immediate arrest, without reason or proof, of all those who "have not constantly demonstrated their attachment to the Revolution" or of those who “having done nothing against Liberty, have done nothing for it”.
Here, these articles will make it possible to prosecute without proof, all those who have an opinion different from that of the health authorities on the therapeutic virtues of (possibly new) products placed on the market by pharmaceutical laboratories. No criticism will be permitted and in the end not only those who doubt the quality of these products, but also all those who refuse to prescribe them, will be suspected of sectarian excesses.
We must, however, remember that the “Law of Suspects swept away the revolutionaries themselves, who ended up falling in their turn under the influence of this double-edged law that they made to get rid of their enemies.”
Let us never forget this.
We thank you for having read our alert on what should be called a legislative drift – at a minimum – in terms of science and its evolution.
Very respectfully,
The entire BonSens.org team
Last modification 54 there is
The Christmas Crib – Open letter
Profession Gendarme - 09 Dec 2023
From Jean Pierre Santon
Dear Mr. Court,
A few days ago I learned of your decision to ban the Christmas nativity scene traditionally installed in the hall of the Vendée General Council.
What fly has stung you?
You have studied, I suppose. Perhaps you know that Christmas comes from the Latin “Natalis” which means Birth.
So I am going to tell you a secret that you will want to pass on to your colleagues who perhaps swim complacently in the same ignorance as you.
The birth in question is that of a certain Jesus of Nazareth born a little over 2000 years ago. I say that because since you didn't ban Christmas lights, I assume you didn't know that detail.
You see, Christmas is not the anniversary of the birth of Santa Claus (I'm sorry if I break a belief anchored in you here) but rather that of this Jesus. Banning a crèche without banning any public demonstration of this holiday is as stupid as if you authorized the andouillette festival while prohibiting the consumption of andouillette on the day of the andouillette festival.
The crèche is what we call a tradition. And do not make me believe, Mr. Court, that the principle of tradition is foreign to you. Otherwise how can we explain that magistrates exercise their profession in such a ridiculous costume if not because it is the result of a tradition?
[...]
Last modification 54 there is
Michel Desmurget: The book, the only antidote to stupidity
Michel Desmurget: The book, the only antidote to stupidityRadio Notre Dame - September 26, 2023
Michel Desmurget, author of the book “The factory of the digital cretin”, guest of Louis Daufresne on the show Le Grand Témoin (Radio Notre Dame)
The book, the only “antidote” to screens according to neuroscientist Michel Desmurget.
Last modification 54 there is
We are getting closer to the end. A very nice reader's letter.
We are getting closer to the end. A very nice reader's letter.Jacob's Ladder - May 27, 2023
We are getting closer to the end. A very nice reader's letter then: "the genocide of the white race is advancing well on its coke rails too...
Hello Nicolas,
Thank you very much for having been our guide to this sublime Salt Monastery yesterday, this walk did me good, the bars of my prison here have been a little apart during this good reading.
Fresh news from Ukraine, my friend tells me that for months many have had nothing to eat and are rummaging through the garbage cans to find some rotten food to eat. And this for the "luckiest" starving people who are not afraid to go out and be embarked manu militari towards a meat grinder front towards the east, that is to say the oldest, completely abandoned to their fate. The “youngest” are hiding because they don't want to be sent to another Mariupol or another Bakhmout. He writes that for what serves as a government there, anything that doesn't fight is useless and is therefore completely left out, without any help.
The genocide of the white race is making good progress on its coke rails too.
Here struggles in single player mode more than ever, my soul whispers to me that to be saved, we must remember that the Boss asked two millennia ago that we persevere to the end, without deviating from the Narrow way so as not to miss the small gate.
So no more compromises. None. Obviously in front, they appreciate very moderately and let me know… multiple overflights of noisy black angels and steels at very, very (too) low altitude sometimes to remind me of my place in hell, sometimes I would tend to forget that I am of "those who are nothing". That'll teach me not to declare my taxes and to write to them (insolent in not wanting to stretch the other yoke!) without waffling what I think about it, driving the point home for the second time in three years after receiving their letters on the header of "liberty equality fraternity" (the best joke for two centuries).
