Last modification 54 there is
Did cloud seeding drown Dubai?
Did cloud seeding drown Dubai?Eel under the Rock - Apr 23, 2024
Dubai conducted cloud seeding exercises for two consecutive days before the floods. Have we crossed the line?
The city of Dubai is paralyzed after torrential rains hit the region in 24 hours, the entire year's rainfall.
Schools were closed and employees were asked to work from home after underground parking lots were flooded. Metro services were also disrupted after two days of downpours. Dubai International Airport, one of the world's busiest, is facing significant disruption with flights diverted or delayed for several hours.
The damage is not limited to the city. Roads in the capital, Abu Dhabi, were also flooded, while a 70-year-old man lost his life when his vehicle was caught in flash floods in Ras Al Khaimah.
In neighboring Oman, 19 people, including schoolchildren, died after days of consecutive rains flooded communities, local media reported.
Triggered by cloud seeding?
Many media outlets have attributed the flooding to the cloud-seeding activities that Dubai regularly engages in to meet its freshwater needs.
Under this approach, planes are used to introduce chemicals and small particles, such as potassium chloride salts, into rain clouds to increase precipitation.
According to Ahmed Habib, a specialist meteorologist at the National Center of Meteorology (NCM), the state carried out cloud seeding in the days preceding the rains. Planes were sent from Al Ain airport on Monday and Tuesday to seed convective clouds that had formed over the region, Bloomberg reported.
Since this news was published, users have taken to social media to share images and videos of the flooding and have blamed the seeding exercises for the flooding.
Should we blame cloud seeding?
While it is easy to correlate the two incidents and blame the flooding on the seeding exercises, a closer look at the reality reveals a different story.
Cloud seeding is not new to Dubai. The Bloomberg report states that this technique has been used since 2002 and has never had such disastrous results in the previous two decades. We can be sure that the seeding experiments did not go wrong this time since Dubai conducts around 300 such operations every year. The NCM also clarified that it did not carry out cloud seeding on the day of the storm.
Last modification 54 there is
Professor Contreras: “The trap of the 2030 Agenda is in the small print”
Professor Contreras: “The trap of the 2030 Agenda is in the small print”International Network - 23 Sep 2023
The Spanish podcast Luz del Mundo – a production of the Catholic Association of Propagandists (ACdP) and the CEU Ángel Ayala Institute of Human Sciences – tackles a controversial topic this week: the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ).
He does so with the help of philosophy of law professor and former Vox congressman Francisco J. Contreras, who sees him as the most visible face of the UN acting “as a proto-world government.” In a conversation with journalist Ana Campos, Professor Contreras argues that although the Sustainable Development Goals seem at first glance indisputable, “the problem is in the fine print.”
Let's start by asking the question: what is the 2030 Agenda?
It is a document containing 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that the UN approved in 2015 and in which it proposes to Member States a horizon of action, with a period of 15 years to achieve it. This is, let's say, the UN acting as a sort of world government, or proto-world government. Not all countries signed it, but Spain was of course one of the first countries to do so. The PP and the PSOE – because in 2015 there was a Popular Party government – compete in the fervor of the “twenty-thirties”, in the sense that the PP claims to have been the government that signed the agenda, but the PSOE affirms that they are the ones who have done the most to put it into practice.
Eradication of poverty, equality between men and women… Anyone with half a brain would accept these Sustainable Development Goals, right?
It's clear. A sinister vision of the 2030 Agenda is spreading, especially in conservative sectors, as if it were some kind of conspiracy of dark elites to dominate the world... and when you open it and look the objectives really don't seem to be that. This is the case, but it is in a more hidden way. But at first glance, the objectives – almost all of them, because there are a few exceptions – are indisputable. Who would be against the eradication of hunger in the world? Who would be opposed to providing clean water and sanitation to the entire world population? Who would be against the construction of quality health systems everywhere, or against quality education? I list the Sustainable Development Goals…
So what's the catch?
Last modification 54 there is
Stop climate engineering
Stop climate engineeringNew World - March 14, 2023
This diabolical weapon is taking on dramatic PROPORTIONS in California right now.
Climate engineering researcher Dane Wigington says the extreme drought conditions that have plagued the western United States are being reversed by more climate engineering. California was spot on. This is not good news because we go from one extreme destroyer to another. Here is what Wigington explains:
“We know the technology exists and is being used to direct higher level wind currents and therefore direct moisture currents, and they direct moisture to where they have caused back-to-back snowstorms. There is no doubt that all these so-called natural disasters are willed and designed by engineers… People act like it's some kind of fringe theory, but it's hard science nonetheless. You can test snow and find the same things in climate engineering patents. There are also aluminum, barium, manganese, polymer fibers, graphene and surfactants. All of this is reflected in our snow. The direction of this moisture flow without chemical nucleation over this chemically frozen nucleated material is creating flooding as we speak. It's not debatable, we have the scientific evidence. From any person's perspective, can there be a legitimate discussion of climate without addressing climate engineering first and foremost? The answer is clearly no. »
