Last modification 54 there is
Iran hits hard
Iran hits hardThe Media in 4-4-2 - Apr 15, 2024
A look back at the historic Iranian response following the Israeli aggression against its embassy.
Iran responded forcefully to Israeli aggression against its embassy in Damascus by carrying out a historic military operation. This response caught Israel off guard and placed Iran in the history book.
On the night of April 13-14, Iran launched a major offensive on Israeli soil that lasted at least five hours, demonstrating its ability to deploy high-tech Shahed drones and Kheibar missiles capable of traveling more than 1 km. This show of force took the Jewish state by surprise and sowed panic among the population.
This attack comes in response to an Israeli assault on the consular section of the Iranian embassy in Damascus, considered a violation of Iranian sovereign territory. According to Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, this Iranian response is legitimate and in accordance with international law.
According to the Chinese newspaper "Global Times", in response to the failure of international organizations, particularly the UN Security Council, to condemn Israeli attacks on Iranian diplomatic facilities, Iran retaliated using intelligence strategic weapons, missiles and drones to successfully destroy major military targets in Israel.
Western countries condemned the Iranian attack. The United States had asked Iran to immediately stop its attack, but Tehran had not only ignored this request, but also threatened to bomb American bases if the White House intervened.
And a big blow for the Zionist entity, according to CNN, the President of the United States, Joe Biden informed the Israeli Prime Minister, Benyamin Netanyahu by telephone that the United States would not participate in offensive operations against Iran.
For his part, the Deputy Speaker of the Russian State Duma, Pyotr Olegovich Tolstoy, expressed his support for Iran on Twitter by publishing a poem praising the friendship between the two countries and their struggle common for a noble cause.
According to sources from the American television channel ABC, the Iranian attack involved 400 to 500 drones and around 150 missiles. The drones were launched from Iran's western provinces, while the Houthis launched drones from Yemen and missile strikes from Hezbollah units based in Lebanon. The perfect coordination between these countries demonstrated an incredible ability to respond effectively to the Zionist entity, which failed to stop all missiles with its missile defense system, known as Iron Dome.
Last modification 54 there is
The survival of Washington's domination of the UN
The survival of Washington's domination of the UNVoltairenet - 21 Dec 2023
When it was created, the United Nations carried an ideal of equality of peoples and nations.
However, from the first months of its operation, Washington and London supported Israel against the Palestinian people. Then, Washington falsified the Security Council by having Formosa sit in place of China and by provoking a boycott of the USSR. Today, the domination of the United States over this institution is denounced by a vast majority of member states. While the BRICS are placing themselves in battle order so that the institution returns to international law.
In one year, the United Nations General Assembly has changed profoundly: in October 2022, 143 States, led by Washington, condemned Russia's “illegal annexations” in Ukraine, while in December 2023, 153 States called for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza, against the advice of Washington.
In the past, Washington could threaten many states and force them to take the same position as it and adopt its rules. Today it's less scary:
Certainly, the United States Special Operations Command (USSoCom) could at any time carry out covert military interference in any country in the world and assassinate any of its leaders, but this deployment seems increasingly unlikely in large countries.
Certainly, the Treasury Department can prohibit trade with this or that state and thus sink the economy of the recalcitrant, or even starve its population. But now Russia and China offer a way to break this economic siege.
Certainly the gigantic communications interception machine of the “Five Eyes” (Australia, Canada, United States, New Zealand, United Kingdom) can reveal the turpitudes of any recalcitrant, but certain leaders are honest and cannot therefore be the subject of blackmail to the detriment of their population.
From this point of view, the list of States having voted against the ceasefire in Gaza is enlightening; in addition to the United States and Israel, it includes a certain number of regimes with surprising characteristics [...]
Last modification 54 there is
UN launches global digital ID program
UN launches global digital ID programThe Defender – Dec 08, 2023
The Gates Foundation-funded program launches as experts warn of a “totalitarian nightmare.”
With the support of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the United Nations this month launched an “ambitious country-led campaign” to promote and accelerate the development of a global digital public infrastructure (DPI).
The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) said its “50 in 5” campaign will encourage the building of an “underlying network of components” including “digital payments, identification and exchange systems data”, which will serve as a “critical accelerator of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”.
“The campaign's goal is for 50 countries to have designed, implemented and scaled up at least one component of the IPN in a safe, inclusive and interoperable manner in five years,” UNDP said.
Criticisms of the campaign include Tim Hinchliffe, editor-in-chief of The Sociable, who told The Defender that IPN “is a surveillance and control mechanism that combines digital ID, central bank digital currencies , [CBDC], vaccine passports and carbon footprint tracking data, paving the way for 15-minute smart cities, future lockdowns and social credit systems.”
UNDP is leading the “50-in-5” campaign with the Center for Digital Public Infrastructure, Co-Develop and the Alliance for Digital Public Goods. Supporters of the initiative include GovStack, the Inter-American Development Bank and UNICEF, as well as the Gates Foundation.
In September 2022, the Gates Foundation allocated $200 million “to expand global digital public infrastructure,” part of a broader plan to fund $1,27 billion in “health commitments.” and development” with the aim of achieving the SDGs by 2030.
The Gates Foundation said at the time that the funding was intended to promote the expansion of “infrastructure that low- and middle-income countries can use to become more resilient to crises such as food shortages, threats to public health and climate change, as well as to help economic recovery and the fight against pandemics”.
Greg Glaser, a California privacy lawyer, called the 50-in-5 campaign a “totalitarian nightmare” and a “dystopian” initiative aimed at small countries “to bring them on board with digital ID.” , digital wallets, digital legislation, digital voting and much more”.
“For political reasons, UN guys like Gates can't openly plan a 'world government,' so they use different phrases like 'global partnership' and 'Agenda 2030,'” Mr. Glaser told The Defender. People can add “50 in 5” to the growing list of dystopian expressions.
Another California privacy attorney, Richard Jaffe, expressed similar sentiments, telling The Defender that the “50-in-5” initiative “focuses on the much more important issue of globalization, centralization and digitization of personal data around the world.
“My short-term concern is that bad actors, that is, individuals and small groups, as well as malicious state actors, will now have a fantastic new target or new tool to threaten the normal functioning of less technologically sophisticated countries,” he said.
Mr. Jaffe said the fact that Mr. Gates was involved frightened him to no end. Derrick Broze, editor-in-chief of the Conscious Resistance Network, told The Defender that this is “another sign that this new push for digital ID infrastructure will not benefit the average person ”.
“Projects like this only benefit governments that want to track their populations and companies that want to study our daily habits and movements to sell us products,” Broze said.
Initiatives to promote the IPN at the global level also benefit from the support of the G20. According to The Economist, during the G20 summit held in September in New Delhi under the slogan “One land, one family, one future”, India obtained the support of the Gates Foundation, the UNDP and the World Bank in favor of plan to develop a global repository of IPN technologies.
Last modification 54 there is
UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 2030: 17 sustainable destruction goals!
UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 2030: 17 sustainable destruction goals!Jacob's Ladder - Nov 10, 2023
The United Nations 2030 Agenda, announced at the United Nations summit in New York in 2015, is a “global treaty for the future” to which national governments should adhere.
This agenda includes 17 “sustainability goals” that seem good at first glance. If we look more closely, we always come back to the same actors who in reality want nothing less than total control over the resources of our planet, a single central global government and therefore the enslavement of all peoples. .
In order to exert influence in all areas of life and structures, these goals are promoted not only by the United Nations itself, but also by influential partners such as the World Economic Forum with its “Great Reset”. For more than 50 years, the WEF has connected the most influential figures in politics, business, science, media, trade unions, NGOs, culture and churches and brought them together with the most rich people of the world.
He has also been educating political and economic elites around the world for over 30 years. Whether it is Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron, Viktor Orban or Vladimir Putin, they have all gone through the WEF school as “Young Global Leaders”. It is therefore not surprising that the founder of the forum, German professor Klaus Schwab, is considered one of the most influential figures today.
The United Nations 2030 Agenda - A 17-point agenda for global domination and the enslavement of all people!
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; This right includes the freedom to hold opinions without hindrance and to seek, receive and disseminate information and ideas through any media and without regard to borders.
United Nations Agenda 2030: Find out below what the concrete and negative effects of the 17 goals are...
Last modification 54 there is
Cut off the snake's head
Cut off the snake's headGendarme Profession - Oct 31, 2023
This video was published in English on October 19, 2023 on Pascal NAJADI's X account which was permanently closed on October 26, 2023 for "non-compliance with the rules of X".
For Profession Gendarme, which has followed this former Swiss banker since he joined the resistance, there is no doubt that this video targeting all the evildoers based in Geneva caused the closure of his account.
We let you appreciate the unequivocal content of his message.
Beautiful Geneva has a dark side. The shadow of the demon reigns there.
Judge for yourself...
Last modification 54 there is
Professor Contreras: “The trap of the 2030 Agenda is in the small print”
Professor Contreras: “The trap of the 2030 Agenda is in the small print”International Network - 23 Sep 2023
The Spanish podcast Luz del Mundo – a production of the Catholic Association of Propagandists (ACdP) and the CEU Ángel Ayala Institute of Human Sciences – tackles a controversial topic this week: the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ).
He does so with the help of philosophy of law professor and former Vox congressman Francisco J. Contreras, who sees him as the most visible face of the UN acting “as a proto-world government.” In a conversation with journalist Ana Campos, Professor Contreras argues that although the Sustainable Development Goals seem at first glance indisputable, “the problem is in the fine print.”
Let's start by asking the question: what is the 2030 Agenda?
It is a document containing 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that the UN approved in 2015 and in which it proposes to Member States a horizon of action, with a period of 15 years to achieve it. This is, let's say, the UN acting as a sort of world government, or proto-world government. Not all countries signed it, but Spain was of course one of the first countries to do so. The PP and the PSOE – because in 2015 there was a Popular Party government – compete in the fervor of the “twenty-thirties”, in the sense that the PP claims to have been the government that signed the agenda, but the PSOE affirms that they are the ones who have done the most to put it into practice.
Eradication of poverty, equality between men and women… Anyone with half a brain would accept these Sustainable Development Goals, right?
It's clear. A sinister vision of the 2030 Agenda is spreading, especially in conservative sectors, as if it were some kind of conspiracy of dark elites to dominate the world... and when you open it and look the objectives really don't seem to be that. This is the case, but it is in a more hidden way. But at first glance, the objectives – almost all of them, because there are a few exceptions – are indisputable. Who would be against the eradication of hunger in the world? Who would be opposed to providing clean water and sanitation to the entire world population? Who would be against the construction of quality health systems everywhere, or against quality education? I list the Sustainable Development Goals…
So what's the catch?
Last modification 54 there is
Sustainable Development Goal 16: Part 1 – Building the Global Police State
International Network - Jul 18, 2023
The United Nations affirms that Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG 16) aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies and ensure access to justice for all.
Behind the rhetoric lies the real objective: to strengthen and consolidate the power and authority of the “global governance regime” and to exploit threats – real or imagined – in order to advance the regime's hegemony.
If we accept the assumption that “sustainable development” is global development that meets the needs of the world's poor, a reasonable person is unlikely to disagree with this stated goal.
But helping the poor is not the goal of SDG 16.
The real purpose of SDG 16 is threefold: (1) to strengthen a global governance regime, (2) to exploit threats, real and imagined, to advance the regime's goals, and (3) to impose on humanity a unjustified, unwanted and centrally controlled global digital identity (digital ID) system.
The UN's digital identity goal is hidden in SDG Goal 16.9:
“By 2030, ensure legal identity and birth registration for all”.
Although SDG 16 does not specifically allude to “digital” identification, that is what it means.
As we will see, the indicators for the SDG 16 target do not reveal the truth either. For example, the only “indicator” to measure progress on SDG 16.9 (16.9.1) is:
“The proportion of children under 5 whose births were registered with a civil authority, by age”.
One could therefore think that the task of “providing a legal identity” falls primarily on the so-called “civil authorities”. This is not the case.
Within the UN system, all governments (whether local, county, provincial, state or federal) are “stakeholder partners” in a global network made up of a wide range of organizations public and private. Many are explicitly supported by the United Nations or hosted on their premises, and all advocate digital ID as a key mechanism for achieving SDG 16.
This aspect of SDG 16 will be explored in more detail in Part 2.
This global amalgamation of organizations often uses one term to describe itself: it is a global public-private partnership (G3P).
The G3P works tirelessly to create the conditions necessary to justify the imposition of global governance “with teeth” and its indispensable digital identification system. In doing so, the G3P reverses the nature of our rights. He fabricates and exploits crises in order to claim the legitimacy of the “solutions” he proposes.
The G3P includes virtually all intergovernmental organizations, governments, global corporations, major philanthropic foundations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and civil society groups. Collectively, they form the “stakeholders” who implement sustainable development, and in particular SDG 16.
Digital ID will determine our access to public services, our central bank digital currency (CBDC) wallets, our “vaccine” certificates – everything, even the food and drink we are allowed to buy and consume.
Suspicious citizens are alert to potential abuses of digital ID by their authorities. In countries where a national digital ID is not welcome, such as the UK, G3P's solution is to build an "interoperable" system that links different digital ID systems together. This “modular platform” approach is designed to avoid the political problems that the formal issuance of a national digital ID card would otherwise create.
Establishing the global digital identity of SDG 16.9 is essential for eight of the seventeen UN SDGs. It is the fulcrum at the center of a global digital panopticon that is being conceived under the auspices of the UN's global public-private partnership “regime”.
Last modification 54 there is
WHO and False Pandemic!
WHO and False Pandemic!Globalization - June 07, 2023
There is no longer any doubt that the new WHO offensive has been launched.
In anticipation of an imminent declaration of a new fake pandemic, it was necessary to neutralize the spoilsports now identified on the occasion of the first fake pandemic with essentially genocidal intent. The hunt for wizards and witches was officially open against Pr Didier Raoult, Alexandra Henrion-Caude, Pr Christian Perronne, Dr Louis Fouché, Dr Nicole and Gérard Delépine, Jean-Marc Sabatier, Pierre Chaillot, Michel Jean-Dominique and all the others who have been the voice of medical and scientific honesty.
Cohorts of disciplined and necessarily mindless civil servants were thus going to land at the Marseilles IHU with drums and trumpets for a spectacular “search” with a lot of propaganda on the media subservient to the system. It was urgently necessary to drag the reputation of Professor Didier Raoult in the mud, to deploy defamation at all costs, to discredit for good the dissident voice of this scientist and of all those who support him, because the imminent proclamation of a new false pandemic was to obtain the expected result this time.
For the genocidal program of the WHO, it was no longer acceptable that people like Didier Raoult could still have the right to speak and that they could once again be at the origin of a resistance which prevented the bastards, scumbags and perverts in power, to get what they wanted: a sufficient, satisfying, effective genocide on the populations kept in training and belief in the innocent narrative of Agenda 2030 (program for depopulation) …
Last modification 54 there is
How Russia sees its role in building the multipolar world
Voltairenet - Apr 07, 2023
Russia has just released its “Foreign Policy Concept”.
After recalling its position in the world, this document describes the end of Western domination and the efforts of the United States and its allies to maintain Washington's hegemony. It lists Moscow's interests and goals. It emphasizes the primacy of contemporary international law (a creation of Tsar Nicholas II) and concludes with a description of the changing world.
President Vladimir Putin met his Security Council by videoconference on March 31, 2023. At the end of this meeting, he promulgated an update of the “Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation”.
In this document, Russia sets out its vision of its role in building the multipolar world.
Firstly, Russia recalls its significant resources in all spheres of life, its status as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, its participation in major international organizations and associations, its nuclear powers and its capacity as successor in rights of the USSR. Above all, given its decisive contribution to the victory in the Second World War and its active participation in the liquidation of the world system of colonialism, it asserts itself as one of the sovereign centers of world development and considers as its historical mission the maintenance of global balance of powers and the construction of a multipolar international system.
Last modification 54 there is
The UN announces an excess mortality of 23,6 million in 3 years
International Network - March 29, 2023
The UN announces an excess mortality of 23,6 million in 3 years, including 16,9 million for "unknown" reasons
The catastrophic data we publish here is public and official data from the UN. They are found in its electronic world population tables. They are very freely downloadable but cannot be viewed online. You only come across them in numbers in spreadsheets and only if you look for them carefully. Nothing relates them in the last writings of the UN on the population and the movements which animate it. Nothing invites their investigation. Nothing is said about it in the official or parallel press which, moreover, only reads reports on glossy paper, is put off by consulting the raw data, avoids the useless check of consistency between words and numbers even when it's about demographics.
Strictly speaking, they are not censored in any way but simply omitted from screens, comments and delicate minds. Much like Edgar Alan Poe's “The Purloined Letter,” though prominent, these data of public safety are carefully housed beyond the reach of public knowledge. For this, we confide in laziness to go and flush them out from those who soon risk being caught inadvertently or by fear of fear in even greater numbers. We provide below a fragmentary screenshot of it in proof mode, without highlighting or manipulation. But we nevertheless urge anyone to personally audit them after uploading to the UN site.
Last modification 54 there is
The UN will cease to exist, the diktat of the Anglo-Saxon countries has ended
International Network - March 27, 2023
Medvedev: The world has changed. It has changed as drastically as I could have ever imagined just a few years ago. There's no turning back
Things won't be the same as before. For better or for worse, I don't know, but it's more likely for the best. »
"The diktat of the Anglo-Saxon countries has come to an end, at least by virtue of the events now unfolding." Institutions also have to change, some of them are garbage (or run like garbage).
In fact, they [the United Nations] remain the most important [international] platform. But I am worried about some developments there, because there is a good chance that the UN will repeat the sad fate of its predecessor, the League of Nations. The level of politicization within the UN is now off limits.
Attempts are constantly made to promote the idea of reforming everything, including the Security Council, and depriving key nations of their veto rights, which, in effect, is the result of World War II. If something like this happens, then, in my opinion, the UN will cease to exist, sad as that may seem.
What will happen next? I don't know, but it is obvious that an era of regional agreements, such as BRICS, SCO and bilateral relations, is approaching. In some ways it may even seem like a step backwards. “But better such a step back than an attempt to fake unanimity under the auspices of the UN or some other agency. International institutions will therefore change. »
Last modification 54 there is
“Too many beehives in town”. When Helping Bees Disappoints Them
“Too many beehives in town”. When Helping Bees Disappoints ThemMr Globalization - Feb 01, 2023
Bees in town? We see this phenomenon developing more and more in urban areas and, above all, in companies. But if the insertion of hives in the city started from an ecological intention aiming to protect pollinating insects, it is today very contested.
“If the bee were to disappear from the surface of the globe, man would only have 5 years to live”. This quote from Albert Einstein takes on its full meaning in the current environmental context. It also alerts to the importance of these insignificant insects for many of us, but ultimately vital to the survival of human and non-human species, as well as their ecosystems. How can such small living beings be of such magnitude in the face of the climate crisis we are going through?
Bees are our allies
Pollinators contribute directly to food security, the UN reminds us via its program for the environment. If this category includes animals such as monkeys, birds or rodents, it is especially known for insects.
According to beekeeping experts from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: 75% of global food production depends on pollinating insects. Although the wind promotes pollination, between 60% and 90% of wild plants require the help of pollinating insects, such as bees, in order to reproduce. And to speak the economic language of our current models, according to the NGO Greenpeace, pollination represents 265 billion dollars of service rendered in the world.
In fact, the global production of honey per year amounts to around 1,6 million tonnes, with around 81 million active hives around the globe (May 2019 report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES)).
If these figures are impressive by their scale, they are partly explained by a historical phenomenon of the insertion of bees. The latter, contrary to what one thinks, does not date from yesterday, because in the Middle Ages, already, the human exploited the hives in town. In recent decades, particularly due to global warming, many scientists are sounding the alarm on the urgency of conserving biodiversity. It is therefore in an ecological approach that the phenomenon of integration of bees has resumed and is increasing.
