In particular, she had Professor Raoult's hydroxychloroquine removed from the list of over-the-counter medications – a “poisonous” substance – at the beginning of 2020, supposedly on the orders of ANSES (the health security agency), or , uh, from the ANSM (the drug safety agency), she doesn't really know anymore, before the Senate commission of inquiry.
The French remember it very well. For her, this memory is anti-Semitism.
The attacks against her person are in reality attacks against her decisions, against her policies, attacks which she blithely transforms into anti-Semitic attacks. Is that why she was installed in this position, given what was going on against the French?
Today, presenting himself as a victim – such nerve! –, she whines at Haziza. The accusation of anti-Semitism has become a shield against justice.
Professor Raoult and four other researchers, Professors Brouqui, Million, Parola and Mc Cullough, publish a new study on the 30 patients supported and treated at the IHU-Mediterranean during the Covid crisis. Initially published on June 423, 4, this study was retracted following pressure from François Braun, Minister of Health at the time. But the Ministers of Health succeed one another and Didier Raoult continues to do science.
In this debriefing, he returns to this publication. The results of the study are statistically in favor of early treatments, which seems logical given the type of disease that Covid is. Not only are the results undeniably in favor of dual therapy (remember that the five researchers associated with the study treated with these treatments during the crisis), but the data were validated by a bailiff for the sake of transparency and integrity. .
Among 30 patients for whom treatment information was available, 202 of 191 (23%) patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and aziththromycin (HCQ-AZ) died, compared to 172/0,82 (344%) who did not receive treatment with HCQ-AZ.
Treatment with HCQ-AZ generated lower mortality than treatment without HCQ-AZ.
The relative odds ratio, or odds ratio in English (OR) is 0,16. It is a statistical calculation which makes it possible to evaluate the dependence between qualitative random variables often used to highlight the degree or strength of an association between samples treated or not in clinical studies. After adjustment and adjustment to take into account the patient's sex, age, period and management, dual therapy is still associated with a significantly lower mortality rate.
Laurent Mucchielli offered an analysis of this study and concluded: “The IHU demonstrates that its anti-Covid protocol could have saved many lives”.
Quoting Schopenhauer (“All truth goes through three stages: it is always ridiculed then violently fought before being accepted as obvious”), Professor Raoult evokes his tweet on the admission of the former president of the Scientific Council Jean-François Delfraissy who admits to having been wrong about the effectiveness of the vaccine. He could also have read the South African Pfizer contract which states in black and white that the manufacturer makes no commitments on effectiveness or side effects.
It has been used in veterinary medicine for years against viruses such as swine pseudorabies or Venezuelan equine encephalitis, both RNA viruses such as Sars-Cov-2. Its action on importins, preventing viruses from entering cells, has been known and recognized since 1972, as has its action against the cytokine shock responsible for the deaths of Sars-Cov-2, as shown by a number of studies and as the also writes the Vidal.
While ivermectin demonstrated its effectiveness in 2020 in numerous testimonies and in all the studies published during the year, at the beginning of 2021 the greatest health manipulation in history took place. France seems to have played a significant role in removing ivermectin from the pharmacopoeia, despite having demonstrated its possibilities while being one of the safest drugs available.
The rise of ivermectin in the second half of 2020 meant that it represented a serious danger for the pharmaceutical industry which had invested billions in research against covid. It was therefore necessary to put an end to this growing therapy, without competition, if not hydroxychloroquine, which the politico-financiers helped by “doctors” had already succeeded in silencing.
Recently, liberal doctors who prescribed these drugs received a summons from their departmental council of the College of Physicians. Questioning their prescription decision, the organization provides nothing less than disciplinary advice. The beginning of a new "large-scale witch hunt", estimates the general practitioner, Grégory Pamart, still suspended since September 15 following his refusal to receive the vaccination against Covid-19.
“The full-scale witch hunt has begun. The order multiplies the summonses.
Announced death of article 5 of the code of ethics (independence of doctors), one more step towards protocol medicine.
Who will stay to take care of you? »
Christian Vélot is a French biologist and politician, lecturer in molecular genetics at the University of Paris-Sud and head of a research team at the Orsay scientific center. He is also a member of the scientific council of CRIIGEN, administrator alongside Jacques Testart of Fondation Sciences Citoyennes and the Maison des Lanceurs d'Alerte, and, from 2012 to 2015, regional councilor for Île-de-France. He is often presented as a whistleblower about GMOs.
"What worries me is that we are using these technologies without any hindsight, on a global pandemic, so very many people will be affected..."
Dr. Benoît Ochs is accused
– for claiming that the masks were toxic,
– for having failed to respect the sanitary measures by carrying out home visits,
– to have a very reticent opinion about vaccines.
He is in fact reproached for having had the courage to respect the Hippocratic oath: “Even under duress, I will not use my knowledge against the laws of humanity. »
"In my patient there was no death"
C19HCQ analyzes all significant studies regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19. The search methods, inclusion criteria, endpoint extraction criteria (the most severe outcomes take precedence), all individual study data, PRISMA responses and statistical methods are detailed in Appendix 1 of this meta-analysis.
“There is a new study on 10000 patients treated on an outpatient basis for which we see an extremely significant difference. Mortality is extremely low”
Three authors of the study published in the Lancet, critical of hydroxychloroquine, are doing an about-face. “We can no longer vouch for the veracity of the sources of the primary data”, write the three authors to the Lancet on June 4, questioning the refusal of the company which collected them, Surgisphere, to give access to the database. .
Published on May 22 in The Lancet, the study concluded that hydroxychloroquine was not beneficial to hospitalized Covid-19 patients and could even be harmful. Its publication had had a worldwide impact and spectacular repercussions, in particular pushing the World Health Organization (WHO) to suspend clinical trials on hydroxychloroquine against Covid-19. But, after numerous criticisms questioning the methodology of the study, including from skeptical scientists about the interest of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of Covid-19, the WHO announced on June 3 the resumption clinical trials with this molecule.
The Lancet study on hydroxychloroquine is an excellent revealer of what our nomenklatura is, of its shortcomings and of its systemic limits in a rapidly changing world. We now know that without a deep (and probably very brutal) renewal of the elites, France will accelerate its long decline.
“Very often, Raoult recalled that his approach was not to do research, but to find solutions by trial and error. This assertion hit where the intellectual construction of our elites suffers. Because our nomenklatura is not educated in the idea that a good government consists in relieving the miseries of the people. »