It is by listening to the media that you consolidate their power of nuisance.
Analysis and advice from Xavier-Louis de Izarra.
“A journalist is a little dog. He is the voice of his master. He is at the service of his master. He works for his boss. The job of spinsters is not to inform you, but to carry out the orders of the boss or the state, it's the same. The journalist is recruited for that. He's selling his boss's dope. He does nothing but advertise his boss. »
The collapse of the Soviet Union changed the international balance of power. The bipolar world was replaced by a unipolar world, which affected the situation of the media, the liberal agenda became dominant and, as a result, the liberal media firmly took control of the global news agenda.
A few years ago, the situation began to change. The world has become multipolar and many countries have chosen their own development path for their media. The Cold War has resurfaced, the old capitalism/socialism antithesis has been replaced by polemics and, in some cases, outright battles between proponents of liberal economics and proponents of state-oriented domestic development policies. social.
Today, our main task is to crush the big, liberal, lie-spreading media and find a way to provide truthful information to the so-called "golden billion" countries about the diversity of the world and the dynamic development of other centers of gravity.
Europe has also experienced an ideological divide which has also affected the media sphere. Most Russian media is blocked in many countries (and not just hostile ones). The multi-billion-funded Russian megaprojects, which were not restructured in time despite numerous warnings, unfortunately did not become significant players in the field of foreign information in Europe. They simply did not exist.
To find supporters of a multipolar world in Europe, it is necessary to create new media and reach internal European platforms in social networks and other resources. It is possible to start by supporting the information resources of Russian compatriots.
Otherwise, we attract big problems: Freedom and Human Rights, that's all very well, but don't push it.
It is thus that to apostrophize the Head of State by reproaching him more or less sharply for his policy and the way in which his government manages current affairs, it is not very well seen and it can even lead you to court. Nothing screams “Democracy!” louder. than imprison those who don't show you respect, right.
Yes: while freedom of expression was once a pillar of democracies, it appears that France – which has never really made the effort to be a particularly applied one – is now at the forefront of making it clear to all its citizens that the question will arise in very different terms as the months go by.
This is how we learn from less and less unofficial sources that on the pretext of fighting against online hatred, the government is considering more and more seriously coercive measures to eliminate certain Internet users from social networks.
Of course, and as usual, to pass what increasingly appears to be a serious constitutional attack on the fundamental right of expression, it will be a question of coating the measure in a good layer of security: in order to keep the networks own social networks on them, we will ban stalkers and other cybercriminals. It will suffice to rely on the new broadside of directives and regulations currently being applied in the European area packaged in the name of “Digital Service Act”, a vast security catch-all where everything can be a pretext to restrict and limit the comings and goings of European Internet users.
It's a bit like the metaphor of the ostrich sticking its head in the sand. But it goes beyond denial. Ignorance is when you don't know something at all, denial is when you know it, but don't know it.
What I'm talking about here is when you know something and you don't deny it, but just rationalize it by saying "they must have a good reason for doing this" or "maybe we don't know not everything there is to know about it”. Which is often followed by "and I don't have the time (the desire, the attention, the interest, the curiosity, the capacity, the intelligence, etc.) to go further".
This has always bothered me to some extent, but I have to admit that I myself have been slightly guilty of this kind of reasoning. I mean, do we really have time to check everything? Well, now I think we have to take the time, and, of course, not everything is important enough to require truth checking. It's a terrible thing to say, but I'm afraid it's the truth.
Part of the “gullibility” that causes many people to brush things off with the assumption that all is well stems from the indoctrination they have been subjected to from an early age. I grew up in a culture that seemed really obsessed with the safety of people, especially children. Think of all the toy recalls and such. As soon as a toy comes out with the slightest bit of uncertainty about how it might harm your child, it's taken off the market.
I shouldn't say I "grew up" with it, as most toys from my childhood would be considered lethal weapons today - lawn darts, pellet and pellet guns, Vac-U-Forms, chemistry sets, Easy Bake ovens (it was my sister's toy, she was a little girl, I was a little boy – I'm telling you this for clarity). The “security craze” didn't really begin until a decade later. I even remember that a child I knew received an “Atomic Energy Laboratory” toy whose kit contained real uranium ore.
I would have died (literally) to get my hands on one of these toys.
That was the time.
As Hersh revealed that the CIA was tasked "to give the system a boost in an effort to dismiss the claim that Biden ordered the destruction of the pipelines," they brought the agencies' artificial intelligence capabilities into action. American espionage “Project SABLE SPEAR”, and to understand the true power and threat of TikTok, a good first step is to read the document “Why TikTok made its user so obsessive? The AI Algorithm that got you hooked”.
One of the world leaders in artificial intelligence research is the OpenAI laboratory, the creator of the advanced artificial intelligence language generator ChatGBT ChatBot. In a recent interview, the CEO of these artificial intelligence labs, Sam Altman, said with awe: "I think people should be happy that we're a little scared by this...I'm particularly concerned that these models can be used for large-scale misinformation… The thing I try to warn people the most about is what we call the “hallucination problem”… The model will confidently state things as if they were facts, but they are entirely made up". And the co-founder of this artificial intelligence laboratory, Elon Musk, bluntly warned during a speech at the Centennial Symposium of the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT on October 24, 2014: "With artificial intelligence , we invoke the demon. In all these stories where there's the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, it's like yeah he sure can control the demon…it didn't work”.
In the past 48 hours, the artificial intelligence “demon” and its “hallucination problem” have come to the fore after President Donald Trump released a video unveiling his plan to take down the Deep State, which has been viewed 1,7 million times — a video immediately countered by artificial intelligence, footage created showing President Trump furiously fighting with arresting New York police officers, has been viewed over 4 million times and constitute a terrifying demonstration proving the power of artificial intelligence on the truth.
“With AI, we summon the demon”
Le Média en 4-4-2 presents to you through its series "Artists against the current" personalities who choose to think outside the box despite the challenges that arise from it. For the fifth episode, we welcome illustrator and author René Bickel. This autodidact is a committed designer, an environmentalist at heart who has chosen a formidable weapon to get his messages across: humour. He depicts a society whose "progress" resides above all in the establishment of a world order, of which he sets out to demonstrate the primary and unacknowledged goals of the domination and exploitation of individuals.
“Everything is planned to prevent the individual from constructing himself and seeking his own reality. »
Representatives of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) monitoring mission were in the vicinity at the time and recorded the shelling as it took place. The OSCE found that the shelling escalated dramatically over the week until reaching a peak on February 19, when 2026 artillery hits were recorded. Do not forget that the Ukrainian army was actually shelling civilian areas along the line of contact, occupied by other Ukrainians.
We would like to emphasize that the OSCE representatives acted within the framework of their professional duties in collecting first-hand evidence of the bombardments in the region. What their data shows is that Ukrainian forces were bombing and killing their own people. All of this has been documented and has not been disputed.
So the question we all have to ask ourselves is: Is the bombing and killing of one's own people an "act of war"?
We think so. And if we are right, then we must logically assume that the war started before the Russian invasion (which was launched a week later). We must also assume that Russia's alleged "unprovoked aggression" was not unprovoked at all but was the proper humanitarian response to the deliberate killing of civilians. To claim that the Russian invasion was not "provoked", one would have to say that firing more than 4000 artillery shells at towns and neighborhoods where women and children live is not a provocation. ? Who will defend this point of view?
Nobody, because it's absurd. The killing of civilians in the Donbass was a clear provocation, a provocation aimed at pushing Russia into war. And – as we said earlier – the OSCE had observers on the ground who provided full documentation of the bombing as it happened, which is as close to eyewitness testimony as you can get. foolproof.
This is, of course, a major break with the “official narrative” that identifies Russia as the perpetrator of hostilities. But, as we have shown, this is simply not the case. The official account is false. Despite this, you may not be surprised to learn that most mainstream media completely failed to cover OSCE investigative activities in eastern Ukraine. The only exception is Reuters, which published a deliberately opaque report on February 18 titled “Russian Voices Alarmed by Sharp Increase in Shelling in Donbass”.
Here is an excerpt...
On Thursday, December 15, Agence France presse (AFP) broadcast a dispatch titled "Electricity: the reading of paying meters from January 1 for certain customers not equipped with Linky" and whose content was taken up by many media and Web sites. However, even if what the AFP wrote is not formally false, the fact is that most people who have seen this information pass have been misinformed.
Indeed, people who have been resisting the invasion of fluorescent green smart meters since 2015 just have to self-read their consumption on the website of the electricity distributor Enedis, or by telephone, to escape at least until in 2025 to currently choppy billing to intimidate them.
It should be noted that this is indeed a simple invoice, among the many others appearing in the catalog of Enedis services, and in no case a fine: the 4 million households still equipped with ordinary meters are not outlaw.
We have seen the year 2021 pass which was a Year 5, that is to say a year of choice between Good and Evil. The result was terrifying = 8 to 2! Or if you prefer, evil won 80% of the vote and good only 20%!
Since then, the true humanity on Earth is only those 20%, surrounded by the 80% (approximately), who have denied their humanity by submitting to evil.
And, even though it was planned for thousands of years, the pill is still hard to swallow, isn't it?
Last year, in 2022, we were in Year 6: we had twelve months conducive to the challenge and the deployment of Love, harmony, beauty, art, service... uh, well let's stop there, because we actually experienced more of a 2+2+2 year: this gives us 6 in total, of course, but with a preponderance of duality (three times the Number 2!) and of all-out division!
In today's newspeak, any search for the causes of an event, other than that provided by the official media, is called "conspiracy theory".
Here, quoted in the order in which they presented themselves to us, are the elements that will enable you to form an opinion on the Notre-Dame fire, on the gigantic spoliation operation that it reveals, on Macron, on Parisian elected officials and those who govern us
Mainstream journalists like to pick up information that cannot be found elsewhere. But this skillful work comes at a cost. Unearthing truths can cost you dearly, even very dearly: closure of personal and professional bank accounts at the request of the government, home visits, accusations of anti-Semitism, racism, conspiracy, summons to the police, complaints of all kinds, burnt house… Here is Xavier Poussard's interview which immerses you in the reality of journalistic work until you reach the forbidden threshold where the mainstream never ventures, on the edge of the truth. Truman Show fans know the script…