Keyword ‣ sexuality
5 references

François DUBOIS calls for parents to be made aware of the growing hypersexualization of content intended for children, particularly in educational programs. It highlights the risks for childhood and pleads for respectful emotional and relational education. Highlighting the importance of parental vigilance and collective action to protect our children.

I am launching this appeal to all parents in order to raise their awareness of the issue of child protection.

We note with dismay a number of growing abuses linked to the hypersexualization of content intended for children and resulting from EAS programs (sexuality education, from primary school) of national education. The new Prime Minister, Gabriel Attal, with his sense of priorities, announced shortly after his appointment, on January 20, that a new education program for emotional, relational and sexual life will apply in establishments schools at the start of the 2024 school year.

Children are confronted with sexual “education” at an increasingly younger age, the content of which depends on the external provider who provides it (often a nurse). There is a lack of control over the message delivered, sometimes leading to the observation of certain abuses which fall under the yoke of the law.

Another problem is that it is difficult, if not impossible, for a parent to obtain the contents of the sequences. What's more, these programs are not systematically announced in advance and are often inserted between two courses, which makes them difficult to circumvent.

Let's stay in the school world (over which we, parents, have little control). France 3 relayed information relating to a CM1 class and a CM2 class from L'Union (Haute-Garonne) who participated in a show during which drawings of a sexual nature were projected. The situation is uncomfortable: children dance in front of their parents with in the background watered-down drawings of orgies or women having their breasts caressed... Have parents filed a complaint? I don't know, but I hope so.

I will therefore start by reminding the law by quoting article 227-22 of the Penal Code:

“The fact of encouraging or attempting to encourage the corruption of a minor is punishable by five years of imprisonment and a fine of 75 euros. These penalties are increased to seven years of imprisonment and a fine of 000 euros when […] the acts are committed in teaching or educational establishments or in administration premises. »

The article of the Penal Code unfortunately does not explicitly define the term corruption. Is this voluntary, knowing that it is much more precise in defining the terms constituting other offenses?

However, corruption means exposing the minor to sexuality and encouraging the minor to engage in sexual activity in any way whatsoever.

The notion of consent does not come into play here and the guilty intention depends, of course, exclusively on the adult involved. The criminalization of corruption of a minor aims to preserve the sense of modesty of minors by protecting them against certain acts tending to arouse their sexual impulses.

By a judgment of the Criminal Chamber of February 8, 2017 (16-80.102), the Court of Cassation specifies that the offense of corruption of a minor is only criminally punishable if the perpetrator had in mind the perversion of the young person. victim and not just the satisfaction of his own passions.

The L'Union affair (Haute-Garonne) is no exception to the rule. Isn't there perverse exposure to minors to sexuality? Isn't there an encouragement, an incentive for minors to be open to this type of practice, or at least to integrate them as a new norm? Can the adults responsible for this staging only claim to have at no time assumed the perverse and corrupting nature of the latter?

Some testimonies sometimes report blatant abuses. Thus we would have largely gone beyond the stage of preventive explanations (STDs, contraception etc.) or biological explanations (mechanisms of reproduction etc.) to display sexual practices, such as sodomy, homosexual relations, or fellatio children who are sometimes extremely young and who are not yet sufficiently constructed and normalized to transition in such a brutal way from their asexual world (ante puberty) to the reality and impudence of adult relationships.

Imposing an extremely detailed explanation of “leisure” sexuality without children being ready for it, and without them asking, is not only extremely violent, but can be extremely disturbing or even traumatic for them. .

Any adult should be aware of this. In this specific case, what is there other than perversion in wanting to corrupt young children by imposing such visions on them?

I am not speaking to alert parents who are already taking concrete action at their own level to protect their little ones.

My appeal is addressed above all to those who do not dare to take the step of protesting in public, either out of a feeling of powerlessness, or because they do not see the danger represented by the hypersexualization of relationships with others. childhood for our society.

Father of three children and recently confronted with this situation with my wife, we realized that we were alone in expressing doubts, asking questions and demanding the contents of this famous “education in sentimental and sexual life” which was to be given to our eleven year old daughter. Following this, the establishment transformed the name of the intervention on pronote into “education for sentimental life”…

After surveying other parents, we realized that despite this overall inertia, a majority of them agreed with us. Unable to obtain (despite our negotiations) any content or summary of the intervention, our daughter did not attend. Simple precautionary principle to protect it from possible illegal infringement. But what a shame that she was the only one absent while the majority of parents thought no less! The goal here was not a full boycott, but to demand more clarification and transparency. Note that according to my daughter, some of her classmates told her that they felt uncomfortable because, despite the name transformed by the establishment into "education for sentimental life" (probably to appease other parents ), we would have talked exclusively about sexual relations to the little ones.

Why this passivity of parents who fundamentally disagree? A majority of French people are disoriented. Tormented by geopolitical chaos plunging it into a moribund socio-economic context, this majority now lives in fear of tomorrow.

Absorbed by her daily difficulties, she no longer necessarily has the energy to fight. Evolving in a society losing its bearings, victim of a vast enterprise of deconstruction and ideological propaganda, she experiences more and more difficulty in discerning the causes for which it would nevertheless be just and necessary to fight.

Trained since 2020 to confine themselves, to be traced, to blindly obey the media-pharmaceutical diktat, this majority today constitutes an archetype of conformist society since it is pusillanimous. This sad observation is only flattering for Orwell, who, alas, was right.

It is this majority to whom I am addressing. It is this majority that needs to be encouraged and helped.

It is also this majority that has sometimes not yet understood to what extent the fight for child protection is essential to the defense of our interests. This fight is essential to avoid losing control of our future. A strong people is a people who can project themselves into the future and identify with the past. A strong people is a people who do not allow themselves to be enslaved and who remain sovereign: a strong people is the essential prerequisite for any democracy.

From the school promotion of transgender ideology[2], through the premature discovery of unbridled sexual practices, sex becomes omnipresent and omnipotent for our children. An inevitable social component of our progressive Western societies, it floods the internet, television, fashion, and now, schools. It must prevail from an early age and the current government has made the hypersexualization of children its hobby horse.

Let's bet that it will above all be a Trojan horse!

Deconstruction through the hypersexualization of society[3] is in this sense a formidable weapon to fragment us into niche ideological and individualist logics which will complicate sentimental relationships, generate family instability and, a major anthropological upheaval, lead to the disappearance of genealogy through the opening of the GPA and PMA markets.

Thus atomized, the society of the future will be unable to constitute a stable and protesting bloc defending common values ​​to oppose an organized elite seeking to despoil it, enslave it and exploit it. Totalitarianism always takes hold insidiously.

It is high time that the nauseating ideological propaganda that attacks our children finally stops. This can only happen through the actions of responsible parents who dare to challenge the system when they believe it exposes their children to danger. Strength must remain in the law as long as it still works for the protection of children; parents should not hesitate to take legal action as long as the violations are sufficiently serious. This is a fight for our children and their future.

ADJ (er) François DUBOIS

read the article