Last modification 54 there is
Bulletin n°133: Otano-Kiev offensive, magic weapons, Yuan for all
Bulletin n°133: Otano-Kiev offensive, magic weapons, Yuan for allStratpol - 13 May 2023
STRATPOL: bulletin n°133 by Xavier Moreau
On the program of this number 133:
Reading advice
Economy
Common currency for the BRICS
Russian oil export records
Melonie and the Silk Roads
diplomacy
Orban protects Hungarians in Ukraine
Russian diplomatic success on May 9 in Moscow
General De Gaulle in Volgograd
Bachar Al Assad Victoris
Indo-Pakistani rapprochement
Armaments
Boomerang in the square
Ukraine: Imaginary Kinjal
HIMARS out of service
STORM SHADOW, the new magic weapon
No GRIPEN for Kyiv
No money for the French army
€1,7 of ammunition for kyiv and no road for Europe
Ukro-terrorism
Budanov wants to kill Russians
Podoliak threatens Europe with a wave of Banderist terrorism
Wagner terrorist group?
Military Considerations
The Prigozhin case
What offensive for kyiv and NATO?
Last modification 54 there is
What are Russia and China using their military dominance for?
What are Russia and China using their military dominance for?Voltairenet - May 05, 2023
Contrary to what Westerners think, they do not have to fear military domination by Russia and China, but the use by them of their military power to compel them to respect their signature.
Russia and China have armaments far superior to those of the West. The first won the war in Syria and is about to win in Ukraine. Despite all its efforts, NATO, which has already failed in the Middle East through jihadists, is unable to reverse reality on the battlefield.
The way of thinking of the former colonial powers leads them to imagine that Russia and China will use their military superiority to impose their way of life on the rest of the world. However, this is not at all their intention and this is not what they are doing.
Moscow and Beijing continue to demand the application of international law. Nothing more. The Russians aspire to be quiet at home, while the Chinese hope to be able to trade everywhere.
The events in Ukraine have made us forget Russia's demands repeatedly reiterated since 2007: it demands security guarantees of its own, in particular the absence of arsenals belonging to third countries stored in its neighbours. Russia does not have the means to defend its borders, the largest in the world. It cannot therefore ensure its security if enemy armies are massed on several fronts at its borders, except by practicing the “scorched earth strategy” of Marshal Fedor Rostopchin. This is the meaning of all the negotiations for the reunification of Germany. The USSR was opposed to it, except that the New Germany undertakes not to store NATO weapons in the East. This is the thrust of all negotiations with the former Warsaw Pact states. And this was again the direction of the negotiations with all the states of the former USSR. Moscow has never objected to a state choosing its allies and possibly joining NATO. He always opposed it if joining NATO implied the installation of NATO armament stocks on its territory.
Moscow was not satisfied until 1999, when 30 OSCE member states signed the Istanbul Declaration, known as the “Charter for Security in Europe”, which lays down two major principles:
the right of each state to choose the allies of its choice and
the duty of each State not to threaten the security of others by ensuring its own.
It is the violation of these principles, and this alone, which has led to the Ukrainian conflict. This was the meaning of President Vladimir Putin's speech at the Munich Security Conference in 2007: he denounced the non-respect of OSCE commitments and the establishment of a "monopolar" governance of the world. .
Last modification 54 there is
Türkiye facing the American Empire
Voltairenet - Apr 27, 2023
Three weeks before the Turkish presidential election, the debate is changing.
From for or against the Islamism of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, he becomes for or against the alliance with the United States. The outgoing president is in the process of regaining points in the polls which predicted him losers. From an Islamist, he became a nationalist. It is not known at the moment if this will be enough to allow him to win, but we must expect, if he wins, that he will withdraw Türkiye from NATO.
The polls show President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan losing to the leader of the united opposition, Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, in the Turkish presidential election on May 14, 2023. This possible internal reversal is leading the outgoing president to radicalize his position in international matters. Until now, it appeared to be halfway between the United States on one side and Russia and China on the other. From now on, his political party presents him as the savior of Turkish independence in the face of the dark actions of Washington. By contrast, he presents his competitor as a Yankees henchman, which he probably isn't at this point.
The United States is thus paying the price for the attempted assassination of the Turkish president, and particularly the one that led to the failed coup of July 15, 2016, after Ankara decided to build a gas pipeline with Moscow and even bought it from him. weapons. In addition, Washington is blamed, rightly or wrongly, no one knows, for having caused the recent earthquake which cost the lives of tens of thousands of Turks. Public opinion therefore shares a strong anti-American feeling in a country that has given a lot to the United States since the Korean War (the Turkish army won there and fought a decisive battle, saving the United States from disaster) and much suffered from them with the Kurdish drama (the CIA took control of the PKK and encouraged its terrorist actions, thus holding “a gun to the head” of Ankara).
US Ambassador Jeffrey Flake ostensibly took the liberty of visiting candidate Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu. Flake is an old-school Republican, a friend of John McCain, like him from Arizona, where they were one of two senators. He howled against Donald Trump's entryism and left the party to get closer to Joe Biden who appointed him ambassador. By showing himself with Kılıçdaroğlu, he thought he was doing well and doing good. Mistake: he gave food for thought to Erdoğan who hastened to declare: “Joe Biden's ambassador is visiting Kemal. Shame on you, think with your head. You are an ambassador. Your interlocutor is the president. How will you stand after that and ask for a meeting with the president? Our doors are closed for him, he can no longer enter. For what ? He needs to know his place”.
On a similar note, Interior Minister and Vice President of the Presidential Party, Süleyman Soylu, publicly condemned the US Ambassador during the earthquake, telling him to take his "dirty hands away from Turkey". ". All Turks noticed that the Westerners had withdrawn their ambassadors from the country in the two days before the disaster, as if they knew about it before it happened, and that they were slow to send relief. Soylu added: “Every US ambassador wonders how he can harm Turkey. It was one of Turkey's greatest misfortunes in years. They gather other ambassadors and try to give them advice. They do the same in Europe so that the US embassies govern Europe”.
The Turks, who are very nationalistic, agree. But the minister is nonetheless still a mafia and an Islamist, publicly denounced by another sponsor, Sedat Peker, now on the run. He revealed in a series of videos posted on the Internet that Süleyman Soylu and the son of Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım used Al-Qaeda soldiers to overthrow the 2016 putschists. He delivered weapons to them via a private military company, SADAT. They were the ones who defeated the insurgent soldiers on the Bosphorus Bridge.
Last modification 54 there is
Wanted: New screenwriters for Zelensky
Wanted: New screenwriters for ZelenskyLe Saker Francophone - Apr 23, 2023
Some consider that the conflict in Ukraine is now halfway through. In any case, we are starting to have a much clearer idea of the possible outcome, which could be around a year from now.
After the fall of Bakhmut, Russian forces would advance towards the Dnieper River, retaking most of what is now eastern Ukraine, and possibly even more to the south. With over half a million Russian troops idle on the borders of former Ukraine, the Russian occupation force on standby is quite large. At this point, the puppets installed by the United States in Kyiv will fall like the puppet governments of Saigon and Kabul before them. Helicopters will evacuate the CIA and NATO agents who have not yet been killed from the roof of the American embassy in Kiev, as well as the senior members of the fearsome secret police, the SBU. Zelensky will be taken to Miami. The Polish mercenaries will flee towards the Polish border.
Three Winners: Local, Continental and Global
A. Ukraine
After the war, there will be three winners. The first will be newly liberated Ukraine, which will return to its natural borders after Crimea, the east and possibly the south are returned to Russia. A free and independent Ukraine, possibly led by a Ukrainian president like Oleg Tsaryov, will be established. Ukraine, whose infrastructure was ignored for thirty years, while exiled oligarch-robbers expatriated Ukrainian money to Tel Aviv, London and New York, will be renovated. Prosperity will come from the completion of the New Silk Road linking Eurasia. Ukraine has a great future as a transport and energy hub. Gradually, over the next five years, the 3 million Ukrainian refugees in Russia and some of the 8 million in Western Europe, once they have been carefully vetted or denazified by Russian security services, will be able to return home. The fact is that there are few genuine Ukrainian refugees outside of Russia. Those who left for Western Europe in the last thirteen months are simply those who would have left if Ukraine had been allowed to join the EU. Without the pull of the EU (see below), many will return home in due course.
B. The Russian Federation
The second winner will be the Russian Federation. Allied with Belarus and the new Ukraine, it will be by far the largest of a solid troika of countries, whose combined population will approach 200 million. Belarus, alienated by the US attempt at a Color Revolution in 2021, is now a staunch ally of Russia and has given up flirting with the treacherous West. As for the new Ukraine, after the Western betrayal of the old Ukraine, it will certainly no longer have any illusions about the empty and absurd promises of the West, with its redundant NATO and EU, which have only brought destruction, impoverishment and enslavement to all of Eastern Europe. The three brothers from Eastern Slavonia will be reunited like never before, due to the interference of the United States which tried to destroy their unity after the fall of the USSR. In addition, Russia's international prestige will be great. Its diplomatic position in the South, in Africa, in Latin America and in Asia, in particular in Iran and Syria, will never have been so high.
C. The Global South
Therefore, the third winner will be the BRICS+, whose economic engine is the People's Republic of China and the ideological engine is the Russian Federation. BRICS+ not only means BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, but also the new members of Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Algeria, Mexico and India. 'Argentina. It will be an organization of the “Twelve”, with a balance between six Eurasian countries, three African countries and three Latin American countries. It should be given a new name – we have long suggested something like AS, “The Sovereign Alliance”. It's just an idea. It would bring together about half of the world's population and more than half of its production. A giant. And who will follow them? Obviously, Belarus and Ukraine. Then maybe Nigeria, Venezuela, Pakistan – the list might well start to look like the makeup of the UN, the United Nations, a post-1945 American puppet, hopelessly outdated and soon to be defunct. The BRICS+ will for now include everyone except the “exceptional” West, i.e. North America (the United States and Canada), the peninsula of Europe (by this we mean Europe to Belarus and Ukraine), Oceania and for now (but not for very long) the few offshore or coastal vassals of the United States in Asia – Japan , Taiwan, South Korea and Israel.
The future of Western Europe
[...]
Last modification 54 there is
Bulletin N°127. Polories, dedollarization, GPA for all
Stratpol - Apr 01, 2023
STRATPOL: Bulletin n°127 by Xavier Moreau
00:30 Fake STRATPOL channels
01:30 How to immigrate to Russia
03:30 Economic news: dedollarization
07:52 Risk-taking for the French BITD
09:40 Mariani vs parliamentary gaucho-bellicism
11:28 Poland
13:33 Otano-lie: Ukrainian children
14:55 Leftist elites vs Ukrainian children and women
16:34 Destanilization
19:24 "At the same time diplomatic"
20:40 Superiority of the SU-35
22:00 US press: mobilization in Ukraine, Ukrainian offensive
24:13 Russian strategy according to Progozhin
26:00 Map of military operations
Last modification 54 there is
Dread in Switzerland: Nathalie Yamb, the pro-Putin influencer
Dread in Switzerland: Nathalie Yamb, the pro-Putin influencerEquality and Reconciliation - March 25, 2023
"Free Africa or death!" We will vanquish ! “, thunders Nathalie Yamb, 54, in her videos posted on social networks.
This Swiss-Cameroonian is one of the most followed influencers in French-speaking Africa. A native of La Chaux-de-Fonds, she has been attracting the attention of Washington and Paris for a few months. Its content is indeed closer and closer to pro-Russian propaganda, as shown in an article published this Wednesday in the Tribune de Genève.
His speech sends shivers down my spine. She describes the Russian invasion as a “NATO-Russia war”, triggered by “the repeated aggressions of the Americans and Europeans […] against the Russian people”. In May 2022, she also called Ukrainians "gangrened by neo-Nazis". Two false statements. Finally, she praised just this week "the inevitable death of Western hegemony" on a Moscow set.
According to information from the Tribune de Genève, France would have "formally intervened with Bern to be moved by its militancy". This does not prevent him from continuing his propaganda from Switzerland. She now resides in Zug. After being expelled from Côte d'Ivoire in 2020, however, she says she has "no intention of staying in our country at all." She co-founded an opposition party there in 2011.
Last modification 54 there is
German minister declares NATO at war with Russia
German minister declares NATO at war with RussiaThe Media in 4-4-2 - Jan 28, 2023
News alert – Annalena Baerbock, German Foreign Minister, declares NATO at war with Russia.
German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has openly declared that the United States and NATO are "waging a war against Russia", prompting strong reactions.
German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock doesn't shy away from putting her feet up during her opening speech Tuesday at the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly in Strasbourg, France, regarding the conflict that between Russia and Ukraine. “We are waging a war against Russia and not against each other,” she said.
Incompetence, pure madness, declaration of war? These statements come in a context where Germany and the United States are supplying heavy armaments to Ukraine, which could be seen as a provocation for Russia and lead to an escalation of the situation. When Germany's top diplomat, Annalena Baerbock, declares that the European Union is "waging a war against Russia", it is likely that the Kremlin will take this very seriously and react by putting its country and its army on alert.
Last modification 54 there is
Climbing. From the war in Ukraine to the war against Russia
Climbing. From the war in Ukraine to the war against RussiaInsolentiae – Jan 27, 2023
When we look at the history of our old continent, it is that of a land scarred by wars. There is no small war in Europe and this one is no exception.
What is striking when we look at the history and the sequences that led to the butchery of 14/18, is that in the end no one really wanted war. But the war took place.
Today, no people in Europe want war, and if we put aside the din of propaganda, few European citizens will spontaneously declare that they very much want to go and die for the Ukraine, from kyiv… to Chernobyl.
In reality, no one wants war among the peoples, which is very different among the leaders who do everything objectively to fuel the escalation.
Last modification 54 there is
The whole of Europe is a battlefield
Voltairenet - 27 Jan 2023
The whole of the European continent now harbors stockpiles of weapons designed for a global confrontation, for a World War.
The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) confirms in January the information given by Grandangolo in December 2022 on the basis of a document from the US Air Force: the C-17A Globemaster aircraft has been authorized to transport to Italy and d other European countries the USA B61-12 nuclear bomb. With officials from the Biden Administration announcing that the B61-12s would have been dispatched early in December, we believe that the new US nuclear bombs are already arriving in Europe to be deployed against Russia.
The USA and NATO are pouring into Ukraine huge quantities of ammunition for the heavy artillery supplied to the armed forces of kyiv. The United States — according to official data — has so far sent to Ukraine more than a million rounds of 115mm howitzer ammunition, plus tens of thousands of missiles. About 300 projectiles come from US military depots in Israel. The shipment of weapons is handled by an international network in which Camp Derby plays a central role. It is the largest arsenal in the USA outside the mother country, connected to the port of Livorno and the military airport of Pisa. The United Kingdom, France, Poland and Finland are supplying tanks to kyiv, and Poland is acquiring Abrams tanks from the USA, some of which may be destined for the Ukraine.
Last modification 54 there is
These so-called "mercenaries" are actually NATO troops
These so-called "mercenaries" are actually NATO troopsInternational Network - Jan 04, 2023
One should always assume that these so-called "mercenaries" are in fact NATO troops, disguised as mercenaries, I certainly do.
“The acting head of the Lugansk People's Republic, Leonid Pasechnik, noted a more blatant NATO involvement in the conflict over Donbass. In an interview with TASS, he said that this is manifested in particular by the amount of weapons supplied [by NATO countries] to the territory of Ukraine. »
On Friday, an officer of the People's Militia of the LPR, Andrey Marochko, told TASS that the Ukrainian Armed Forces Command had sent detachments consisting of foreigners armed with NATO-type weapons to the towns of Artemovsk and Soledar. in the Donetsk People's Republic.
Speaking to TASS, Pasechnik also reiterated that thousands of mercenaries from more than 50 countries are fighting in the ranks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the area of Russia's special military operation.
Last modification 54 there is
Bulletin n°114: War NATO vs Russia, the lessons of 2022
Stratpol - Jan 02, 2023
STRATPOL: Bulletin n°114 by Xavier Moreau
Contents of this one hundred and fourteenth bulletin:
- 00:48 Interview with Denis Pouchiline
- 02:08 Putin vs digital dictatorship
- 03:35 Sino-Russian alliance and cooperation
- 07:42 South Korean peaceful strategy
- 08:36 Special operation 2022: the results
- 14:14 Washington an irrational actor?
- 18:00 p.m. The advent of Gamelins
- 20:45 Failure of miracle weapons
- 23:11 Triumph of the god of war
- 29:00 The new mercenary
- 32:00 The French left and the war against Russia
- 35:55 Massive calibration and absence of snow
- 37:35 Map of military operations
Last modification 54 there is
Cognitive warfare: NATO is plotting a war to take over people's minds
International Network - Dec 23, 2022
Since 2020, NATO has been pursuing its plans for psychological warfare which must be placed on an equal footing with the previous five areas of operation of the military alliance (land, water, air, space, cyberspace).
This is the battleground for mastering public opinion. NATO documents speak of “cognitive warfare” – mental warfare. How concrete is the project, what steps have been taken so far and who is it aimed at?
To be victorious in war, you must also win the battle of public opinion. This has been done for more than 100 years with increasingly modern tools, the so-called soft power techniques. These describe all the psychological tools of influence with which people can be guided in such a way that they themselves are not aware of this control. The American political scientist Joseph Nye thus defines soft power as “the ability to persuade others to do what you want without using violence or coercion”1.
