Last modification 54 there is
WHO demands vaccine passports and border closures
WHO demands vaccine passports and border closuresDeep Geopolitics - May 30, 2023
WHO demands vaccine passports and border closures: Member countries forced to follow its orders
British MPs fear a new treaty to boost the powers of the WHO will allow it to close borders and introduce vaccine passports
The World Health Organization (WHO) could impose lockdowns on the UK [and all European countries] in a future pandemic under new sweeping powers.
Member states would be required to follow the agency's instructions when responding to pandemics, including introducing vaccine passports, border closures and quarantine measures, according to a draft update of the regulations. Agency.
A new 'pandemic treaty' being discussed would also require Britain to spend 5% of its health budget on preparing for a new virus outbreak.
Ministers say they are alarmed by plans to increase the powers of the WHO, which would allow its governing body to require countries to hand over the recipe for vaccines, regardless of intellectual property rights, and to fight misinformation.
Tory MPs have written to ministers warning them of a 'clear ambition for the WHO to move from an advisory body to an international monitoring authority'.
Last modification 54 there is
Google renews its partnership with the WHO
Google renews its partnership with the WHODigital Dawn - May 29, 2023
Google has renewed its partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO) to provide what it calls "factual" information about different diseases and conditions.
This partnership is seen as a way to combat the medical “misinformation” seen during the pandemic.
On the Google search engine, knowledge panels already appear at the top of the results when users search for certain pathologies and diseases.
Soon, knowledge panels will include more conditions and diseases such as depressive disorders, Ebola, COPD, malaria, hypertension, diabetes, Mpox and more, using information verified by the WHO.
In a previous partnership, Google provided the WHO with more than $320 million in advertising grants to help disseminate its medical information. As part of the new partnership, Google has given the global public health organization an additional $50 million to continue its efforts.
Last modification 54 there is
Children and screens: where is the disaster?
Children and screens: where is the disaster?The Age of Doing - May 26, 2023
Children spend too much time in front of screens. A study confirms this, without however revealing the full extent of the problem.
Conducted by the National Institute for Demographic Studies (INED) and the National Institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Elfe* is the first French study studying the exposure of very young children to screens. It thus collected data from the parents of 13 children – a very substantial sample – in order to estimate their exposure time at 528, 2 and a half and 3 years.
Race report: 2-year-old children spent an average of 56 minutes each day in front of a screen (TV, computer, smartphone, etc.), while the WHO recommends sparing them completely. The 3 and a half year old brats stuck to it daily for 1h20 and those of 5 years old for 1h34, while the WHO recommends not to exceed 1 hour of exposure at these ages.
Overexposure is therefore very real, and this while “the deleterious effects of screen use in childhood and early childhood have been highlighted in the literature. Studies show in particular an increased risk of overweight and obesity, and difficulties in the development of language and cognitive development associated with the use of screens. It also emerges fairly clearly from this study that the exposure of children is linked to the level of education of the parents – in this case that of the mother, the only one taken into account in this survey. Thus, the lower the mother's level of education, the more time spent in front of screens.
Last modification 54 there is
One Health: A plan to monitor and control all aspects of life
One Health: A plan to monitor and control all aspects of lifeThe Defender – May 10, 2023
Experts who spoke to the Defender suggested that One Health has more to do with a biosecurity program, a global surveillance system, vaccine passports and restrictions on human behavior than with health protection. human.
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines “One Health” as “an integrated and unifying approach that aims to balance and sustainably optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems”, because they are “intertwined and interdependent” – a concept that, on the face of it, seems to promote lofty goals linking human health and environmental health.
However, some scientists and medical experts are concerned about One Health's vague goals. Arguing that the concept has been “hijacked,” they question the intent of those involved in developing and rolling out the concept globally, including the WHO, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the World Bank. world.
Experts who spoke to the Defender also raised questions about other aspects of the One Health concept, including a biosecurity program, a global surveillance system, vaccine passports and restrictions on human behavior. .
Although these goals are underpinned by a loosely defined 'theory of change', experts have told the Defender that major financial interests are at the heart of the 'One Health' agenda, which appears to be closely linked to climate change and development initiatives. sustainability promoted by the same global organizations.
One Health goals include a 'global takeover of everything'
Last modification 54 there is
The takeover of the WHO in the world
The takeover of the WHO in the worldInternational Network - Apr 29, 2023
The new international health regulations of the WHO and the treaty on pandemics, a health tyranny unprecedented in the history of humanity.
WHO global takeover: beware of the new international health regulations and pandemic treaty, a health tyranny never seen before in human history.
UK Member of Parliament Mr Andrew Bridgen denounces WHO's new International Health Regulations (IHR) and Pandemic Treaty as an unprecedented power grab – depriving WHO's 194 member countries, the world , their sovereignty over national health issues.
The new International Health Regulations and Pandemic Treaty would shift the power to decide what a pandemic is and what requires Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHICP) status, and literally how any health matter should be addressed to the Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO) – an unlimited term of diktat.
The Director General of the WHO can decide on an outright ban, accompanied by sanctions, of the use of drugs "prohibited by the WHO", even if their effectiveness has been duly proven. This is precisely what happened during the so-called COVID-19 pandemic. Doctors and pharmacists were not allowed to prescribe, recommend and sell drugs effective against COVID, as the WHO prohibited it.
This power of the WHO would be expanded as international law, or rather as “Rules-Based Order”, the tyrannical new concept chosen by the elite, to literally circumvent all national and international laws.
Both the IHR and the Pandemic Treaty will be put to a vote at the next World Health Assembly, May 21-30, 2023. The vote is scheduled for May 24, 2023. A two-thirds majority is needed for the treaty to pass. be adopted by the 194 members of the Assembly.
Watch this 20-minute video of Mr. Andrew Bridgen, British MP, explaining to the UK Parliament why the new WHO IHR and pandemic treaty must be voted down.
Last modification 54 there is
Covid from 2019 to February 2023, an essential documentary base
Covid from 2019 to February 2023, an essential documentary baseProfession Gendarme - Apr 12, 2023
Guillaume Girard delivers here an exceptional decryption of all that this story contained known until February 2023, in support of 233 documents that we should all archive before some disappear.
by Guillaume Girard
1. Sars precedents and the hijacking of virological research
Coronaviruses have been studied for a long time
Coronaviruses (“crown” viruses) are a large family known since the 301s2, common to humans and animals2002, such as those of human bronchitis or mouse hepatitis for example. Dedicated studies have multiplied since the first Sars epidemic in XNUMX.
The youngest are not affected by the respiratory syndrome, only the very old die
The lethality of Sars-Cov-1 (2002) and Mers (2012) is limited to the elderly or immunocompromised, and this also applies to Sars-Cov-2, despite specific mutations giving it greater contagiousness. The rate of infection in the general population is low3 and the lethality is at the level of seasonal influenza.4
Spike protein is well known
The “spike”, in French spike protein, is a protein common to many viruses. It is an infectious and inflammatory protein, a virotoxin. That of coronaviruses is well documented5; it has been the subject of numerous publications, even patents6,7, sometimes filed explicitly for vaccine purposes8, and possibly relating to an entire coronavirus9. Three American researchers, including Ralph Baric, still regularly under contract with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), filed a patent2002 in early 10 on methods for producing recombinant coronaviruses, at the dawn of the first Sars epidemic. In 2004, it was the turn of the Institut Pasteur and the CNRS to file a patent on a strain of Sars coronavirus.11
“Gain of function” is a proven practice and meant to be framed
The practices of biotechnology consisting in inserting one or portions of the genome into an existing genome are practiced, secretly or officially, in all the countries having laboratories and qualified scientists, in particular in the USA, but also in Canada, in China. Given the health risks incurred, a moratorium imposed the suspension of these practices on American soil in 201412; partially lifted in 201713, it is proposed to renew it in 202114. Between 2015 and 2017, Ralph Baric and his colleague Boyd Yount filed several successive versions of a patent relating to chimeric “spike” proteins.15
Military research is outsourced
Many establishments carry out research around viruses, including coronaviruses, in particular at the initiative of the United States or China. DARPA16 is the US military research agency that has funded biological agent research programs for many years. One of its main subcontractors is Moderna, of which Stéphane Bancel, the current CEO, is co-holder of a 2017 patent on an mRNA for oncology17. In addition, the officially non-governmental EcoHealth Alliance is a multi-million dollar organization from the US government. Directed by Peter Daszack, it has, among other things, funded the Wuhan laboratory for its research on gain of function, in partnership with the University of North Carolina (USA). The funding circuits for this outsourced work are detailed in Michel Cucchi's work, “Influences and Pandemics”18. Some of this funding comes from the “Pentagon”, the Department of Defence19, which also supports various private research structures via consortia20,21 within which there are many pharmaceutical companies.22
The WHO is infiltrated by “philanthropic capitalism”
Last modification 54 there is
Lawyer Philipp Kruse reveals WHO power plans
International Network - Feb 26, 2023
The lawyer Philipp Kruse explains, in a conference, how the WHO, financed by private funds and based in Geneva, proceeds. This publishes what is called the “International Health Regulations”.
It is stipulated that “sanitary measures are only authorized with respect for the human rights in force, the dignity and the fundamental freedoms of persons”. However, efforts are now being made to remove this wording.
“WHO and Switzerland – what next? It was under this title that an event organized by Urs Hans of "Public Eye on Science" took place on January 13, 2023 in Turbenthal in the canton of Zurich. In the first lecture, Astrid Stuckelberger, a former WHO collaborator, presented the main fundamental questions relating to the so-called “Covid” pandemic. Then the Zurich lawyer Philipp Kruse summarized the events since 2020. He questioned the measures taken since the beginning of their declaration, for example: on what bases does the pandemic rest? What were the effects of the measures taken?
Kruse then turns to the WHO, a private organization headquartered in Geneva. This publishes what is called the “International Health Regulations”, which most states have complied with. In its current version, measures are, for example, only permitted with due respect for applicable human rights and the dignity and fundamental freedoms of individuals. However, it is now planned to delete, among other things, this wording. What is behind these proposed amendments?
What would be the consequences ?
Last modification 54 there is
WHO and New World Order
WHO and New World OrderAnthropo-Logics - Feb 22, 2023
A new masterful analysis by my colleague Françoise Bloch about what is going on at the WHO and the role that some would like to see this deeply corrupt organization play in the new world order...
Maneuvers to subject countries to the binding decisions (dictats) of the WHO have already been taking place in broad daylight for a few years. If the Westerners appear subject to this global totalitarian agenda, the good surprise has come on several occasions from the rest of the world, to whom obviously we do not do so when it comes to imposing new forms of imperialism.
This comes at a time when the organization continues to discredit itself. Despite the virtual absence of new cases, for example, the WHO has just renewed "monkey pox" as an international health emergency... A health emergency without cases is another interesting innovation in the register of the theater of the absurd… but certainly not public health!
As for the very dubious scientist Jeremy Farrar (director of the Wellcome Trust), he has just, barely elevated to the dignity of Chief Scientist of the WHO, to propose that we renounce investigations as to the origin of Sars-CoV-2 – question indeed without importance! He then defended himself against it, knowing how hot the subject is: no less than ten bat coronavirus chimeras were produced in the Wuhan laboratory after Barack Obama banned research on gains of function on viruses – Sars-CoV-2 now appearing well, as Professor Luc Montagnier had said very quickly, an engineered product of life…
Beyond these nasty adventures lies a real fundamental problem: the desire to subordinate the health sovereignty of countries in a binding manner to an international organization known today as being THE most corrupt in the world.
Last modification 54 there is
WHO could create a global totalitarian state, warns expert
The Defender – Jan 20, 2023
Exclusive: WHO proposals could strip nations of their sovereignty and create a global totalitarian state, expert warns
Secret negotiations took place this week in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss proposed changes to the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Health Regulations (IHR), considered a legally binding instrument of international law.
Similar negotiations took place last month for the drafting of a new WHO treaty on pandemics.
Although the two are often confused, the proposed amendments to the IHR and the proposed pandemic treaty represent two separate but related sets of proposals that would fundamentally alter the WHO's ability to respond to "public health emergencies" around the world. , and, according to critics, would significantly strip nations of their sovereignty.
According to author and researcher James Roguski, these two proposals would transform the WHO from an advisory organization to a global governing body whose policies would be legally binding (would have the force of law).
They would also greatly extend the scope and coverage of the IHR, institute a system of global health certificates and "passports", and allow the WHO to impose medical examinations, quarantines and treatments.
According to Roguski, the proposed documents would give the WHO power over the means of production during a declared pandemic, call for the development of IHR infrastructure at "points of entry" (such as national borders), redirect billions of dollars towards the “emergency pharmaceutical hospital industrial complex” and remove the mention of “respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people”.
Last modification 54 there is
COVID: Increase in the number of “child deaths linked to strep A”
Profession Gendarme - 17 Dec 2022
Comparison of official government reports suggests rise in 'Strep A-related child deaths' is due to vaccination against COVID causing Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
In the spring of 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a "global alert" about a new form of severe hepatitis that was killing children.
Then, just days after the WHO announcement, a new scientific study was published "by coincidence", concluding that the Covid-19 vaccination has the ability to cause severe autoimmune hepatitis.
Now, months later, the authorities, with the help of the mainstream media, are instilling fear of God in parents across the UK over the safety of their children, due to an alleged series of sudden deaths of children from what is normally a mild bacterial infection called Strep A (Streptococcus A).
Last modification 54 there is
Exclusive: The first version of the WHO treaty on pandemics
Exclusive: The first version of the WHO treaty on pandemicsThe mail from the strategists - 09 Dec 2022
We have repeatedly mentioned the future treaty on pandemics, which will allow global governance of health policies (and therefore a compulsory vaccination policy decided by the WHO for all its member states without democratic consultation).
This project is progressing. Today we are publishing the "conceptual" version of this text, which must enter into negotiation with the States from February 2023.
This text of around thirty pages should therefore be discussed, according to the WHO, in February 2023.
It should be noted that he lays down some very globalist principles.
Here is the content...
Last modification 54 there is
Brigitte Autran - Still too many unvaccinated people!
Brigitte Autran - Still too many unvaccinated people!France Evening - 17 August 2022
Immunologist Brigitte Autran will chair the "health risk monitoring and anticipation committee", successor to the Scientific Council created two years ago to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic.
The immunologist Brigitte Autran will chair a new committee which succeeds the Scientific Council and which will assess the health risks not only linked to viruses, but also to the consequences of global warming on health. Promoter of mass vaccination, she already warns that the Covid-19 crisis is not over: we must expect a new peak at the start of the school year, warns the doctor who also wishes to accelerate the campaign. vaccination against monkeypox.
"There are still too many people who have not been vaccinated or not revaccinated (...) Effective treatments to avoid serious forms, such as Paxlovid, are offered too few to fragile patients"
