Keyword ‣ love
3 references

“Jesus is the first character who proposed to us a world-system, something which is universal, and which also starts from a double Hegelian inversion, it is very interesting: it is inverting the polarity of Judaism, which is still an elitist and racial thing, and by inverting Judaism, making it something universal and of love, while Judaism is a religion of racial hatred, it is a religion of hatred and a racial religion.

Jesus is a Jew who reversed Judaism, to make something of racial hatred something of universal love, and although he was killed very quickly by the Sanhedrin, that is to say the elites who did not want the Jews at first to convert from racial hatred to universal love, because that is the story of the passion of Christ, and what the Gospels tell us, and although it apparently failed since he was put to death and crucified, he rose again on the third day, so that is already the religious belief, ultimately I can do without it, it is because in fact his ideology of universal love, which is the first in the history of the world, that's what I say in my book, it doesn't exist among the Hindus, it doesn't exist among the Chinese, that's it, it's is Jesus, well it spread throughout the world through the Roman Empire through the conversion of Constantine.

That is to say, it was a racial hatred inverted into universal love which was propagated throughout the West by a pagan military empire, so it is a double Hegelian inversion. »

A philosophical reflection on the current dystopia starting from the crucifixion of Christ.

“During the trial of Jesus, Pilate asked the crowd, as was customary, which prisoner he should release. He asked, “Who do you want me to release: Barabbas or Jesus, called the Christ?” » The crowd demanded the release of Barabbas and the crucifixion of Jesus! That says a lot, friend. Indeed, we always come back to the same story: that of La Boétie. Indeed, when a tyranny triumphs, it is more because of the people who obey the tyrant en masse than the tyrant himself. It is the crowd that called for the death of Jesus when they could have saved him and it is the crowd that calls for tyranny by kneeling before the tyrant and supporting him when they could say no. The last two years bear witness to this. The message here is clear: everything that happens in the years to come, absolutely everything, will be your fault, people. You are the one who holds the cards, you are the one who can choose to crucify yourself or not. Your children and grandchildren will wear the cross or the irons on their feet that you have accepted for them to wear. Accepted by accepting the unacceptable. But above all, accepted by refusing to look in which direction you were running: that is to say, by following the movement of the crowd led by malicious masters, by closing your eyes and covering your ears. People, you have not understood the lesson of Jesus, nor that of Socrates, nor that of La Boétie, so you will relive the flood. You will relive it to learn like a child who must grow up. This is the reality of man in the XNUMXst century: he is a child with technology in his hands, nothing more. A child who sends rockets into space but lacks wisdom. A child who refuses to meditate on emancipatory messages and who will pay a high price. That of freedom. »

read the article