Keyword ‣ story
7 references

It was organized, from 1915, by the colonial power with the idea that the future State(s) should never succeed in ensuring their security. Unbeknownst to them and to their expense, the Palestinians and Israelis, by playing the October 7 operation and its response, are only implementing this policy. By failing to stop the ethnic cleansing of the Gazans, the Anglo-Saxons are not demonstrating their insensitivity, but the fact that they consider the massacres as simple adjustment variables.

Although the massacres in Sudan and Congo are much deadlier than in Palestine, it is the latter that I am going to talk to you about today. In fact, this is the first time that we have witnessed ethnic cleansing live on our cell phones. I would like to come back to various information that I have already covered in various articles, but which, clearly, certain media do not want to include in their analyses. I would like to tell you that there is no community fatality: this conflict was not provoked by the populations of Palestine, whether Jewish, Christian or Muslim, but by external powers who, for a century wished that they would never know peace.

The creation of Israel by the British

To make myself understood, I will, first of all, tell you about the United Kingdom. You attended the coronation of King Charles III. You remember that in the middle of the ceremony, he took off his rich clothes and dressed himself in a linen cloth. Its pages set up screens so that the audience would not be dazzled. When the screens were removed, he had become king. He was then given the symbols of his power, the scepter and the globe. What had happened in those few moments out of public view? The Prince of Wales had seen God, like Moses before the burning bush [1]. This explanation probably seems preposterous to you and you wonder how its subjects could believe such a tall tale. In reality, since James VI, in the 2th century, British sovereigns have declared themselves kings of Israel [3]. It was against his conception of divine right that Oliver Cromwell overthrew King Charles and proclaimed the Commonwealth. However, the Lord Protector was just as enlightened, he professed that it was necessary to bring together all the Jews in Palestine and rebuild Solomon's temple there [XNUMX]. Ultimately, successive dynasties maintained this myth. They adopted various rites and imposed others on their subjects, such as Jewish circumcision, practiced automatically in maternity wards in the XNUMXth century on all newborn males in the Kingdom at birth.

Two years before the Balfour Declaration (1917) which announced the creation of a Jewish national home in Palestine, a Jewish diplomat and future Foreign Minister, Lord Herbert Samuel, wrote a memorandum on the Future of Palestine (1915). He pleaded for a Jewish state which would place the entire diaspora in the service of the Empire. A little later, he clarified that this new state should never be able to ensure its security alone in order to be eternally dependent on the Crown of England. This is exactly what we are witnessing today. It is fate that has cursed the population of Palestine.

Lord Arthur Balfour's statement was followed by US President Woodrow Wilson's 14 points. He describes the objectives achieved by his country during the First World War. Point 12 is strangely worded, but during the Paris Conference which drafted the Treaty of Versailles, it specified in writing what was to be understood: the creation of the State of Israel in Palestine (and Kurdistan in Turkey) . The World War had caused a rebalancing of forces, so that from now on Washington worked alongside London in the defense of common interests.

During the interwar period, Jewish immigration to Mandatory Palestine went well. The Arab landowners sold part of their land to the Jews without any problem. However, as early as 1920, Arab terrorists murdered Jews. Among the assassins, Mohammed Amin al-Husseini was sentenced by the British to 10 years in prison, but they never executed him. On the contrary, Lord Herbert Samuel (the one who had written that he should never have security in Palestine), who had become the British high commissioner in Palestine, pardoned him and appointed him grand mufti of Jerusalem, allegedly to maintain a balance between the two large local families.

A Salafist (that is to say a Muslim wishing to live like the companions of the Prophet in the 7th century) appeared, Izz al-Din al-Qassam, who had already organized a revolt against the French in Syria and who became imam in Haifa. He decided on jihad, not against the British occupiers, but against Jewish immigrants. Various attacks and pogroms against Jews followed. To maintain civil peace, the British killed al-Qassam, who gave his name to the current Hamas al-Qassam Brigades.

The death of al-Qassam had not resolved anything at all. The British, faithful to their colonial technique of “Divide and Rule”, always developed with one hand what they fought with the other. In 1936, Lord Willam Peel, at the head of an official commission, assured that peace could only be restored by separating the Arab and Jewish populations into two distinct states. This is what we now call the “two-state solution.”

During the Second World War the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem became the ally of Chancellor Adolf Hitler. He notably mobilized Balkan Muslims to join the SS and supported the "final solution of the Jewish question." For their part, the Jewish fascists (“revisionist Zionists”) led by the Ukrainian Vladimir Jabotinsky, fought alongside the Axis against the British. The Zionists, for their part, fought alongside the Allies while contesting the limits that the British theoretically imposed on Jewish immigration; in theory only.

[...]

read the article