The next stage of this ban is due to take place in early 2025.
At the start of 2025, housing classified G in the energy performance diagnosis (DPE) will no longer be able to be rented. In any case, this is what the current texts provide.
Because Bruno Le Maire, the Minister of Economy and Finance, said this Tuesday, September 26, 2023, that he was “very favorable” to the postponement of this ban on the rental of thermal strainers, which already concerns certain very energy-intensive housing units (those consuming 450 kWh of final energy per square meter per year).
“I consider that everything that was decided before the rise in rates deserves to be looked at again in the light of this crisis,” he explains, in an interview with Le Parisien. “What was possible when money was available, becomes impossible with rates this high. We have to be very pragmatic and see if we can shift the calendars.”
Currently, this schedule provides that class F housing will be prohibited from renting on January 1, 2028 and that class E housing will be prohibited from renting in 2034. » (Source Ouest-France here)
We need to slow down the transition and return to common sense.
There are several parameters to take into consideration...
By carrying out these administrative procedures, you would allow the municipality to automatically initiate legal proceedings against you.
Xavier Marmier had done it this way following a request from the town hall for his cabin and he got trapped, as his lawyer explains: https://bit.ly/3fPJSNg
What's more, we don't have to wait for a town hall to give us the right to settle on our land when it comes to living there in respect of nature; this is what light housing offers.
Obtaining future rights will require a collective struggle; it is always by putting pressure on the institutions that the laws have been able to evolve in favor of the citizens.
And above all, let's not wait for the laws to change to change our laws.
www.desobediencefertile.com
How can we call it? “Directive monopoly under abusive laws”, here is in essence their project, black rock will buy the housing stock and you will become a tenant, then your retirement, etc. This is the true face of Europe, a dictatorship for the countries trapped inside, they must be stopped, because their one and only objective is that they want to ruin you to reduce you to slavery with the universal income in line of sight for all. Watch how he's starting to scare you again with the water today... so he can fit in better.
How can we call it? “Directive monopoly under abusive laws”, here is in essence their project, black rock will buy the housing stock and you will become a tenant, then your retirement, etc. This is the true face of Europe, a dictatorship for the countries trapped inside, they must be stopped, because their one and only objective is that they want to ruin you to reduce you to slavery with the universal income in line of sight for all. Watch how he's starting to scare you again with the water today... so he can fit in better.
Plus, their real complementary problem is that in a few years it won't even be selling their house, but how to get there themselves with no gas and no money due to an economy ruined by aligning with the United States and the looting of the state mafia by the WEF, and its Guru who organizes the looting in order for financiers (BR) who have the rulers in place as traitors. The selection via the DPE and other obligation under cover of the “climate” by the WEF is a way of validating the great reset project. That people don't realize it is to … cry and scream.
“It's a mind-boggling text! This is pre-totalitarianism! »
Before starting to get to the heart of the matter, Jonathan Attias summarizes the law and its application. Before 2014, there was no real statute that explained what light housing is. Since the ALUR law, the notion of “removable residence” has been defined. It is a habitat that has no footprint, in other words that has no foundation, with no size limit. Contrary to what we imagine with the term "light habitat", we can quite have space and a yurt of 50 m2 for example.
The ALUR law also determines the legal framework that applies to the removable residence, through the STECAL (sectors of limited size and capacity) which are areas within the local urban plans that can derogate from the building areas. traditional to allow light housing to be installed there.
Before 2014, STECALs could only be determined by the town halls. Since the ALUR law and the latest territorial reforms, things have become more complex: if you want to put a STECAL in a municipality, you have to go through a departmental commission, the CDPENAF, and come to an agreement with the whole of the surrounding municipalities, within the framework of the local inter-municipal urban plan.
All those who go knocking on the door of a town hall to ask for help should not expect it to open its arms to you, because it has lost its right of decision. On the other hand, she has earned the right to denounce you.
“City halls today are deprived of this right to decide. So it's not worth asking them for permission because it embarrasses them."
We explained to you that to install an alternative house (yurt, Tiny House, trailer…) no building permit was required. On the other hand, yurts, Tiny Houses, caravans and other removable dwellings cannot be installed on any terrain. So, is it possible to put an alternative house on a non-constructible land?
“Psychologically, it's very hard. We are exhausted. Will Adrien and Marine have to say goodbye to their mobile homes, installed in their agricultural shed? This is what worries the two market gardeners. This summer, the mayor of Maché, in the Vendée, gave them formal notice under penalty to leave the premises. Since November 8, the couple must pay 50 euros per day of on-call duty. They resist, not without difficulties.
Since November 8, Adrien Cano and his family, a young couple of market gardeners living in Vendée, have been indebted 50 euros per day to their municipality, or 1500 euros per month. The mayor has put them on notice for installing a mobile home on the farm where they work. The couple filed an appeal against the decree. Their appeal was examined on November 22 at the Nantes administrative court. “We hope for the suspension of this ridiculous fine of 50 euros per day, pending a judgment on the merits or another outcome of this case. The court's decision is expected in a few days.
The case is far from being anecdotal. A few weeks ago, a couple of farmers growing saffron in the Alpes-Maritimes went to court in Nice. The town hall threatened them with a fine of 200 euros a day if they did not remove the tiny house they built on their farm. "The court suspended the decree for serious doubt on the legality, it is a first case law on light housing", rejoices Paul Lacoste, of the Halem network (Inhabitants of ephemeral or mobile housing) which informs and accompanies legally the people in light housing.
On trial on September 19, he will be fixed on his fate on October 3. A case illustrating the complexity that surrounds light habitats.
With its mud-straw walls and rounded shapes, Amalia and Harald's home looks like a hobbit's house, straight out of a movie. Nestled in an old quarry, the house overlooks a little corner of paradise where goats, geese, chickens and dogs live together freely. Protected from animals by a fence, a space is devoted to market gardening in permaculture. Tomatoes, squash and butternut: the fairy tale continues in this vegetable garden, where everything is abundance and profusion. “It's the magic of compost made in dry toilets! jokes Amalia, picking juicy, sweet-tasting tomatoes. However, the adventure could soon stop.
On September 19, Harald and Amalia were summoned before the criminal court of Quimper: they are accused of having made arrangements on a non-constructible zone without authorization from the town hall. Their house risks being destroyed, and their beautiful project abandoned. Without a lawyer, and unprepared for the workings of justice, the couple struggled to make themselves heard during the hearing: "It was a total fiasco...", testifies Amalia on the telephone, her voice still trembling at the out of court. How did they get there? To understand, you have to go back three years.
On the program, Introduction to healthy homes, financing and certifications, insulation, waterproofing and mold, doors and windows, heating, air conditioning and ventilation, paints, floor coverings and other healthy materials