Last modification 54 there is
In the midst of the Palestinian genocide, Arte broadcasts The Shoah of the Ghettos
In the midst of the Palestinian genocide, Arte broadcasts The Shoah of the GhettosEquality and Reconciliation - 21 Jan 2024
The Franco-German Shoah channel has put its very big clogs on, in the middle of the Israel/Hamas war and in the middle of the Palestinian genocide (already 26 dead, 000 injured and 60 “displaced”): it broadcasts The Shoah from the ghettos , a variant of the Shoah after the Shoah in the camps, the Shoah by bullets, etc.
There is Holocaust galore but Internet users, given the unadulterated comments, did not appreciate the timing. We selected around twenty. But first, the good doc.
The voiceover at 30'08: "The hope of an autonomous existence free from German terror is only short-lived. Ghettos were not designed by the Nazis as places to live. Described as death chambers by Josef Goebbels, these are spaces where the occupant experiences slow death through hunger, disease and forced labor. The inhabitants are at the mercy of the decrees and limitations imposed by the German administration, starting with the supply of food, which is strictly regulated. »
Naturally, we come up with a crazy idea:
“The hope of an autonomous existence free from Jewish terror is short-lived. Gaza is not designed by Israelis as a place to live. Described as a death chamber by Benjamin Netanyahu, it is a space where the occupier experiences slow death through hunger, disease and forced labor. Gazans are at the mercy of the decrees and limitations imposed by the Israeli administration, starting with the strictly regulated food supply. »
Last modification 54 there is
EU wants to spy on Europeans' internet use
EU wants to spy on Europeans' internet useDigital Dawn - Jan 20, 2024
In recent years, outright censorship in all its forms has increased. During the covid madness, government and industry teamed up to create a censorship-industry complex to more effectively promote false narratives and silence dissent.
The European Commission is an EU legislative body with regulatory authority over digital technology. Article 45 of the EC's proposed eIDAS Regulation would deliberately weaken certain aspects of internet security that the industry has carefully developed and strengthened for over 25 years. This article would in effect grant the 27 EU governments very broad surveillance powers over Internet use.
The rule would require all Internet browsers to trust an additional root certificate from an agency (or regulated entity) of each of the national governments of each of the EU member states. For non-specialist readers, I will explain what a root certificate is, how trust in the internet has evolved and what Article 45 brings in this regard. Next, I'll highlight some comments from the tech community on this issue.
The next section of this article explains how the Internet's trust infrastructure works. This context is necessary to understand how radical the proposed article is. The explanation is intended to be accessible to a non-technical reader.
The regulation in question concerns internet security. By “internet” here we mean, to a large extent, browsers that visit websites. Internet security has many distinct aspects. Article 45 aims to change public key infrastructure (PKI), which has been part of internet security since the mid-90s. PKI was first adopted and then improved over a period of 25 years, in order to give users and publishers the following guarantees:
Browser-website conversation privacy: Browsers and websites converse over the Internet, a network of networks operated by Internet service providers and Tier 1 carriers, or cellular carriers. if the device is mobile. The network itself is not inherently secure or trustworthy. Your home Internet service provider, a traveler in the airport waiting room where you're waiting for your flight, or a data provider looking to sell leads to advertisers may want to spy on you. Without any protection, a malicious actor could view confidential data such as a password, credit card balance, or health information.
Ensure that you view the page exactly as the website sent it to you: When you view a web page, could it have changed between the editor and your browser? A censor may want to remove content they don't want you to see. Content labeled as “disinformation” was largely removed during the covid hysteria. A hacker who stole your credit card might want to remove evidence of their fraudulent spending.
Ensure that the website you see is the one in the browser's address bar: When you log into a bank, how do you know you are seeing that bank's website, and not a fake version that looks the same? You check your browser's address bar. Could your browser be tricked and show you a fake website that looks identical to the real one? How does your browser know – for sure – that it is connected to the right site?
In the early days of the internet, none of these guarantees existed. In 2010, a browser plugin available in the add-ons store allowed the user to join another person's Facebook group chat at a hotspot cafe. Today, with ICP, you can be pretty sure of these things.
These security features are protected by a system based on digital certificates. Digital certificates are a form of identification – the internet version of a driving license. When a browser connects to a site, the site presents it with a certificate. The certificate contains a cryptographic key. The browser and website work together using a series of cryptographic calculations to establish secure communication.
Together, the browser and the website provide the three security guarantees:
- confidentiality: by encrypting the conversation.
- cryptographic digital signatures: to ensure that content is not modified in flight.
- publisher verification: through the chain of trust provided by the ICP, which I will explain in more detail below.
A good identity should be difficult to counterfeit. In ancient times, the wax casting of a seal served this purpose. Human identities rely on biometrics. Your face is one of the oldest shapes. In the non-digital world, when you need to enter an age-restricted venue, for example to order an alcoholic drink, you will be asked for photo ID.
Last modification 54 there is
The Media in 4-4-2: Meet the creators of CrowdBunker
The Media in 4-4-2: Meet the creators of CrowdBunkerThe Media in 4-4-2 - Dec 16, 2023
The technological shield against censorship on social networks.
We are pleased to welcome Hayssam and Matthieu, the visionary minds behind CrowdBunker. During this interview, we will delve into the genesis of CrowdBunker, its financially atypical operating model based exclusively on voluntary donations, the challenges encountered and the future aspirations of this platform, a true bulwark for freedom of expression.
Le Média en 4-4-2: Hello Hayssam and Matthieu, welcome to Le Média en 4-4-2! Before we look at CrowdBunker which will be the main subject of our interview, can you introduce yourself in a few words for those who don't know you?
Matthieu: Hello Yoann, thank you for this interview. For my part, I am Matthieu, entrepreneur and IT engineer. Passionate about technologies since a very young age, I try to put them at the service of humans by creating useful and impactful projects. At the end of 2020, I created CrowdBunker. A few weeks after its launch, I had the chance to cross paths with Hayssam, whom I will let introduce himself, without whom this platform would, very probably, not have been able to evolve and reach such an audience so quickly.
Hayssam: Hello Yoann! Thank you for allowing us to talk about CrowdBunker, a remarkable and vital project for our future! I am a holistic coach, based in Morocco, and I am a supporter of a world without money where Being is at the Heart of Everything. I support individuals, New World projects and companies in search of Spirit to co-create Together a new societal paradigm where Love – the true, our Nature, Consciousness – once again becomes the universal Law, replacing all twisted rules that have disrupted the world.
Last modification 54 there is
The map of the French-speaking conspiracy web
The map of the French-speaking conspiracy webProfession Gendarme - 05 Dec 2023
One of our loyal readers sent me the map of French-speaking conspiracy theorists published by “Conspiracy Watch”, the site of the famous Rudy Reichstadt, well known today as the spokesperson for Doxa.
We are pleased to inform you that Profession-Gendarme appears very prominently in the center of this map.
As we are people with a minimum of education, for once we feel obliged to warmly thank dear Rudy for not having forgotten us.
We invite you to consult its publication with the map cited above on the following link: https://www.conspiracywatch.info/conspiracymap/#/graph
A big thank you to very dear Rudy Reichstadt for having worked hard for us and thus allowing us to consult the most important sites in the defense of our Freedoms and the Truth.
To find out more about his “methodology and approach” itself qualifying his work of information and critical monitoring as being rightly “WITHOUT EQUIVALENT” we invite you to follow this link: Mapping the French-speaking conspiracy web: methodology and approach
Through this publication “Rudy” seems to be doing what we call self-satisfaction, that is to say satisfaction with himself. (Synonyms for self-satisfaction: vanity, conceit, pretension, smugness, triumphalism, infatuation)
Let us also not forget the taxpayer's money that he easily earned and diverted for his own benefit, such as the Marianne Fund, among others.
Last modification 54 there is
How Netanyahu falsifies the news
How Netanyahu falsifies the newsVoltairenet - Nov 22, 2023
We think we are correctly informed in the West about what is happening in Gaza. It is not so. The images we see are selected. The comments we hear do not allow us to understand them. They deliberately mislead us.
Any dissenting opinion is censored.
Like all wars, the one between the State of Israel and the Palestinian population is the subject of a media battle. The Palestinian Resistance does not need to tell the story of the injustice it is fighting against: you just have to look to see. It rather aims to magnify one or another of its components. Israel must, on the other hand, convince of its good faith, which after three quarters of a century of violation of international law is not an easy task.
Before the attack
Since the attack by the Palestinian Resistance on October 7, 2023, Israel has deployed all its services to make us believe that this attack is an operation by Hamas jihadists; and that he knew nothing about his preparation.
However, this attack was carried out by all Palestinian factions, with the exception of Fatah. Hamas defined itself until recently as the “Palestinian Branch of the Muslim Brotherhood”, as indicated on all its documents. In this capacity, he fought against the secularists of Yasser Arafat's Fatah and George Habache's PFLP, then against those of President Bashar al-Assad's Syrian Arab Republic. All, in his eyes, were only “enemies of God”. Hamas was financed by Israel and, in Syria, its fighters were supervised by Mossad and NATO officers. However, after the failure of the Brotherhood in Egypt and their defeat in Syria, Hamas was divided between a part loyal to the Muslim Brotherhood, led by Khaled Meshaal and still pursuing the establishment of a global Caliphate, and another which refocused on the liberation of Palestine. This second trend, initiated by Iran, reconnected with Syria until its leader, Khalil Hayya, was received in Damascus by President Bashar el-Assad. She also reconnected with the Lebanese Hezbollah, to the point of participating, in Beirut, in meetings with it and other components of the Palestinian Resistance.
[...]
Last modification 54 there is
The Schmilblick
The SchmilblickJean-Dominique Michel - Nov 18, 2023
Censorship and YouTube, crooked media and free media, not forgetting good old Schmilblick!
Uncensored information from Jean-Dominique Michel
Last modification 54 there is
The Nobel lie
The Nobel lieInternational Network - Oct 18, 2023
Doctors, scientists protest Nobel prize awarded to team whose research led to COVID mRNA vaccine technology
Controversy has erupted over Monday's Nobel Prize for developing an mRNA vaccine, with critics questioning its safety, pointing to risks identified years ago and alleging Big Pharma has corrupted science in its race to expand commercial applications.
Scientists and doctors critical of Covid-19 vaccines have leveled sharp criticism at the Norwegian Nobel committee after it awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to two University of Pennsylvania biochemists for their work on the development of “effective mRNA vaccines against Covid-19”.
Katalin Karikó, Ph.D., and Drew Weissman, M.D., Ph.D., received the award Monday for their “groundbreaking discoveries … about how mRNA interacts with our immune system [and for contributing] having contributed] to the unprecedented pace of vaccine development during one of the greatest threats to human health in modern times,” according to the Nobel committee press release.
Dr Robert Malone, the renowned inventor of mRNA technology, reacted on X/Twitter:
“Karikó and Weissman get the Nobel Prize, not for inventing mRNA vaccines (because I did), but for adding pseudouridine which made it possible to manufacture an unlimited number of spike toxins in which could have been a safe and effective vaccine platform, if it had been developed in a safe manner.
Dr. Malone challenged the integrity of the price, claiming that Big Pharma was behind it.
“Pfizer has been campaigning for this award since 2020. At first, they claimed (like Karikó) that it invented the mRNA vaccine technology. Pfizer makes large donations to the Karolinska Institute which awards the Nobel Prize. »
Last modification 54 there is
EU: government threatens Elon Musk to block X (Twitter)
The Media in 4-4-2 - Oct 13, 2023
Serious warning from Jean-Noël Barrot to Elon Musk regarding the regulation of content on digital platforms, under the Digital Service Act (DSA) in Europe.
Jean-Noël Barrot, Minister Delegate for Digital Affairs, sent a stern warning to Elon Musk regarding the regulation of content on digital platforms, including Twitter (renamed X). This gesture follows Thierry Breton's previous letter, and it highlights the obligations arising from the Digital Service Act (DSA) in Europe.
The DSA, in force since the end of August, imposes fines and even bans on platforms that do not respect the rules for moderating publications. Barrot stressed that the decision to adopt these regulations rests with the sovereign European people.
He also clarified that these rules will apply to all platforms, including X (formerly Twitter), if they do not meet moderation standards. The French government has taken action by reporting these issues to the European Commission and to Thierry Breton, who has already issued warnings to Twitter in the form of tweets.
Last modification 54 there is
The State subsidizes the press of multi-billionaires!
The State subsidizes the press of multi-billionaires!The Free Thinker - September 14, 2023
But there is not enough money for the Restos du Cœur...
It's astounding, almost unbelievable. The State subsidizes one of the richest men in the world who has just been ranked by Forbes as the 2nd largest fortune in the world in 2023 with $231.9 billion!
Bernard Arnault who, like all multi-billionaires, set up his media empire to control propaganda, receives subsidies from public money: 14 million euros last year!!!
Then, this same multi-billionaire will write a small check for 10 million euros to the Restos du Cœur to make people believe that he is a great philanthropist, a man like the rest of us, who wears his heart on his sleeve.
How is it possible to give a multi-billionaire – who continues to multiply his billions – public subsidies? It should simply be prohibited by law because it is prohibited by reason. In other words, it is quite simply a pillaging of the public treasury by a decadent and totally above-ground bourgeoisie.
The State finds a way to subsidize the richest while asserting that there is no money for the poorest who have nothing to eat.
Last modification 54 there is
Independent versus private media: the info war is declared
Independent versus private media: the info war is declaredMr Globalization - August 14, 2023
Like many countries around the world, France faces a vast problem of information processing. In the hands of a handful of privileged people with convergent interests, the French prime-time media are sorely lacking in pluralism. Deciphering a propagandist drift.
As Le Monde Diplomatique explains, around forty large groups, families or individuals have access to almost all the media in France. Among them are a number of billionaires and wealthy industrialists. Based on this observation, there are therefore clear conflicts of interest.
Today, according to Media Crash of Oxfam, which quotes Julia Cagé: 9 billionaires own more than 80% of the media in France. These 9 billionaires are:
- Bernard Arnault: Les Echos, L'Opinion, Le Parisien, part of the Perdriel Group (Challenges, Sciences and Future)
- Patrick Drahi: BFMTV, RMC, L'Express, Liberation i24
- Xavier Niel: Le Monde SA (Le Monde, Télérama, Courrier International, L'OBS, Le Monde Diplomatique, Huffpost), NJJ (Paris Turf, Nice Matin, Var Matin, Monaco Matin)
- Daniel Kretinsky: Le Monde SA (Le Monde, Télérama, Courrier International, L'OBS, Le Monde Diplomatique, Huffpost), Elle, Marianne, Télé 7 Jours
- The Dassault family: Le Figaro, Le Figaro Magazine
- François Pinault: The Point
- The Bouygues family: TF1 group (TF1, LCI, TMC, TFX)
- Arnaud Lagardère: Paris Match, Hachette Livre, the JDD, Europe 1
- Vincent Bolloré: Canal + Group (Canal +, C8, CNews), Prisma Media (Capital, Current Woman, Télé Loisirs, GEO, Here, Gala), part of Lagardère (Paris Match, Hachette Livre, JDD, Europe 1 ), France Catholic
Indeed, among the 6 main general national dailies sold in France, 4 are controlled by billionaires. The Dassault dynasty, specialized in armament aviation, therefore owns the Figaro. The echoes are held by Bernard Arnault, the richest man in France. And despite independence funds for the press, the extremely wealthy Xavier Niel and Patrick Drahi keep control of Le Monde and Liberation respectively. Only Humanity and the Cross retain a relative autonomy.
Last modification 54 there is
How Wikipedia Became a Tool for Information Control
Equality and Reconciliation - August 13, 2023
Wikipedia, symbol of open knowledge, would have become a tool of manipulation, affirms Larry Sanger, co-founder of the encyclopedia. The CIA and the FBI would have edited articles, in order to control certain narratives.
Wikipedia, one of the many resources used by the US deep state and its allies in the intelligence community, has become an instrument of "control", according to Larry Sanger, co-founder of the site, in an interview with the journalist Glenn Greenwald.
Speaking on Glenn Greenwald's "System Update" podcast, Sanger laments how the site he helped create in 2001 has become an instrument of manipulation in the hands of the left-liberal establishment, including the CIA, FBI and other US intelligence agencies.
"We have evidence that as early as 2008, CIA and FBI computers were being used to modify Wikipedia," he said. “Do you think they stopped doing it at that time? »
CIA and FBI activity on Wikipedia was first made public in 2007 by a programming student named Virgil Griffith. Griffith developed a program called WikiScanner that could track the location of computers used to edit Wikipedia articles, and discovered that the CIA, FBI, and many large corporations and government agencies were cleaning the online encyclopedia of compromising information.
CIA computers were used to suppress accounts of victims of the Iraq war, while an FBI computer was used to suppress aerial and satellite images of the US prison at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. CIA computers were used to edit hundreds of articles, including those on former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, China's nuclear program and the Argentine navy.
Some edits were more trivial, with former CIA chief William Colby apparently editing his own entry to expand his list of accomplishments.
Last modification 54 there is
Ukraine war: German journalist Alina Lipp faces 3 years in prison
The Media in 4-4-2 - August 08, 2023
Alina Lipp is a German-Russian journalist, based in Donetsk in the Donbass since last fall. She covers the Russian-Ukrainian conflict as an independent journalist, as can Anne-Laure Bonnel and Christelle Néant.
Which is not to the liking of the German government, because Alina Lipp is very popular, a little too much moreover, she has no less than 167 subscribers on Telegram messaging that the news sites take up very widely.
But what is Alina's crime? The latter had the impertinence to qualify Ukraine's war crimes in the Donbass, which have taken place since 2014, as "genocide". She faces up to three years in prison. Far from stopping there, the German government closed his bank accounts, as well as those of his father in order to dry up his income which allows him to inform the German population.
But the relentlessness does not stop there. She posted a message on Telegram saying that “Denazification has begun”, in reference to the incursion of the Russian army against the soldiers of the Azov battalion, supported by the Zelensky regime, who do not hide their adoration of Hitler , as well as Nazi Stepan Bandera. After these remarks, the Public Prosecutor's Office is investigating a "criminal" act, considering that the journalist ""encourages or tolerates crimes regulated by the Criminal Code, and that the Russian invasion supported by Alina Lipp would constitute a crime under international criminal law. ".
