The problem is that if Jews want to be feared, they must also accept being hated. “Fear of the Jews” can be literally translated as “Judeophobia” (from the Greek phobos, to fear). To be feared, you must have the power to do harm, and you must prove it. So if Jews want to be feared in order to combat anti-Semitism, then anti-Semitism has a bright future ahead of it.

This all doesn't make much sense. But it's very biblical. To my knowledge, the Hebrew Bible does not recommend that Jews strive to be liked by non-Jews. On the contrary, Yahweh said to his people in Deuteronomy 2:25:

“Today and henceforth I will fill the people under all heaven with fear and terror toward you; whoever hears of your approach will tremble and writhe in anguish because of you.”

If Yahweh wants to sow terror among non-Jews, doesn't that make him a terrorist, or the god of terrorists?

This is the case, and this makes Zionists good Yahwists. In his 1951 memoir, “The Revolt,” Menachem Begin boasted of “the military victory at Deir Yassin,” as news of the massacre of 254 villagers (mostly unarmed men, women and children) immediately led to the “mad and uncontrollable stampede of 635 Arabs. (…) The political and economic importance of this development can hardly be overestimated”000. Was Begin not a worthy servant of his national god?

What Netanyahu is doing today is more than 130 times Deir Yassin. And the goal, once again, is not just to kill indiscriminately, but, in doing so, to terrorize millions of Palestinians into leaving “voluntarily.” This explains why they allow so many images of the martyrdom of Gaza to filter through: it is a public crucifixion, intended for everyone. (Andrew Anglin suggested another reason, not contradictory to this one).

One of Netanyahu's favorite Bible stories is the Book of Esther. He mentioned it in 2015 before the US Congress, as an argument to justify that America should bomb Iran2. The book of Esther is important for understanding how Jews want to be feared. Under the influence of his minister Haman, the Persian king Ahasuerus published a decree of definitive solution concerning the Jews of his kingdom, because "this people, and he alone, constantly opposes every nation, perversely following a strange way of life and laws, and is ill-disposed toward our government, doing all the evil he can to prevent our kingdom from achieving stability” (3:13). But thanks to Esther, the secretly Jewish wife of Ahasuerus, the Jews reverse the situation and obtain from the king that Haman be hanged with these ten sons, and that a new royal decree be promulgated, which gives the Jews "permission to destroy, massacre and annihilate any armed force of any people or province which may attack them, their women and children, and plunder their property” (8.11). This is how the Jews massacred seventy-five thousand people. Throughout the land, the book concludes, “there was joy and gladness among the Jews, with feasts and feasts. Many of the population of the country became Jewish, because from then on the Jews were feared” (8.17).

This story is very important to Jews, because every year on Purim they celebrate the hanging of Haman with his twelve sons, and the massacre of 75 people, including women and children.

According to the conclusion of this story, the fear of the Jews produces new Jews, that is, Gentiles who become Jews out of fear of the Jews: "many became Jews, since now the Jews were feared." Or, in a more literal translation: “many people became Jews because the fear of the Jews fell upon them.” As I said, fear of Jews is more likely to produce anti-Semites than new Jews. However, there are many examples of people who become Jewish out of fear of Jews: any non-Jewish politician who has ever put a yarmulke on his head and sworn eternal loyalty to Israel fits this profile.

There is another story in the book of Joshua that goes along the same lines. At the beginning of chapter 2, Joshua, who receives his orders directly from Yahweh in the Tabernacle, sends two spies to the city of Jericho. Having been spotted, they hide with a prostitute named Rahab. She helps them escape in exchange for being spared with her family when Israel attacks the city, because, she says, "we are afraid of you and all the inhabitants of this country have been seized with terror at your approach » (2:9).. Because Israel is so terrifying, it assumes that "Yahweh your God is God."

The French Catholic Bible of Jerusalem adds a footnote saying that "Rahab's profession of faith in the God of Israel made her, in the eyes of more than one Father of the Church, a figure of the 'Church of the Gentiles, saved by his faith'. I find the idea of ​​making the whore of Jericho a symbol of the Church perplexing because, out of fear of Israel, she converted to Israel's god and helped Israel commit genocide in her own city ( “men and women, young and old, including oxen, sheep and donkeys, all were slain” (Joshua 6:21).

On the other hand, it is a good metaphor for the complicity of the Christian world in the Israeli genocide of Gazans. There is no doubt that among most Christians today, fear of the Jews is far stronger than pity for the people of Gaza. And the heads of state of most Christian nations would rather start World War III with Russia than criticize Israel. Russia is, after all, a rational enemy, while no one knows what a psychopathic Israel is capable of.

Israel is the only country that openly threatens to blow up the planet. They call it the Samson option. The Samson option is the combination of Israel's nuclear capability and Israel's reputation as dangerously paranoid. Everyone knows that Israel has around a hundred nuclear warheads (80 according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute). And everyone knows that Israel is biblical, eager to fulfill prophecies, like Zechariah 14:12:

“And this is the scourge with which Yahweh will strike all the nations that fought against Jerusalem; their flesh will rot while they are still standing; their eyes will rot in their sockets; their tongue will rot in their mouth.”

Martin van Creveld, professor of military history at the University of Jerusalem, explained to the British newspaper The Guardian in 2003 that the recurring Palestinian Intifadas would find only one solution: the “transfer” of all Palestinians out of Palestine. On the risk of opposition from the international community to such a project, he added:

“We have several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions…We have the capacity to take the world with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under.”3

That’s the Samson option in a nutshell. Its essence is nuclear terrorism.

read the article